• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Reason Israel Does What It Does

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChezC3

Relentless Thinking Fury
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
12,228
Reaction score
4,458
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent


Just a day in the life at an Israeli checkpoint

When faced with daily threats such as this, what would you do?

Also, how many of those would be considered by the MSM as "civilians"?
 
Just a day in the life at an Israeli checkpoint

When faced with daily threats such as this, what would you do?

Also, how many of those would be considered by the MSM as "civilians"?

Israel is responsible for the safety and security of not only themselves, but those they occupy. It's quite a responsibility.
 


Just a day in the life at an Israeli checkpoint

When faced with daily threats such as this, what would you do?

Also, how many of those would be considered by the MSM as "civilians"?


And just to add to the crazy reality we live in; that fiend was shot by that security guard and then taken to the hospital and is now being treated by Israeli doctors, just like all of the others of those dozens of terrorists who survived their attacks.
 
And just to add to the crazy reality we live in; that fiend was shot by that security guard and then taken to the hospital and is now being treated by Israeli doctors, just like all of the others of those dozens of terrorists who survived their attacks.

Damn those Palestinians and their genetic predisposition to attack Israelis.
 
Damn those Palestinians and their genetic predisposition to attack Israelis.

Yeah, and you aren't engaging in strawman arguments now are you?
Sickening.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, and you aren't engaging in strawman arguments now are you?
Sickening.

I could be wrong. Maybe it's anti-Semitism. Or she doesn't recognize Israel's right to exist.
 
I could be wrong. Maybe it's anti-Semitism. Or she doesn't recognize Israel's right to exist.

Obviously she's anti-Semitic and obviously she doesn't recognise Israel's right to exist if she engages in terrorism against Jews, that doesn't excuse your ugly strawman argument trying to claim anyone suggested this is an issue of genetics. That's just messed up and I feel sorry that you choose to do so.
 
Obviously she's anti-Semitic

How is that obvious? It see her attack an Israeli, but his ethnicity and religion are not readily apparent.

and obviously she doesn't recognise Israel's right to exist if she engages in terrorism against Jews

What is the political message she was trying to convey in her act of terrorism?
 
Damn those Israeli's and their genetic predisposition to treating Palestinians?

Well, we know why Israel occupies the Palestinians. What we're trying to discern is why Palestinians would attack Iraelis. It's a real brain-tease.
 
Well, we know why Israel occupies the Palestinians. What we're trying to discern is why Palestinians would attack Iraelis. It's a real brain-tease.

Why would you knife someone in the street. That's quite a brainteaser.
 
Why would you knife someone in the street. That's quite a brainteaser.

I don't know. Maybe she's crazy. But the OP suggests that this is what happens regularly. Which suggests that the problem is the Palestinians. I can't figure it out!
 
his ethnicity and religion are not readily apparent.

That's really not the point but he's actually a religious Jew as his yarmukle shows, so if you're going to claim that doesn't make him appear Jewish you're not relying on logic and I don't know how you expect me to react to such an assertion.
 
That's really not the point but he's actually a religious Jew as his yarmukle shows, so if you're going to claim that doesn't make him appear Jewish you're not relying on logic and I don't know how you expect me to react to such an assertion.

I don't see him wearing a yarmulke in the video. Must be a black one.
 
Why would you knife someone in the street. That's quite a brainteaser.

Obviously she tried to pull out her cellphone to show him some pictures of cats but someone placed a knife there instead and she was so surprised that she fell right on the security guard with the hand holding the knife rised towards him because she tried to catch him and stop the fall and she's clearly right-handed.
There are no Palestinian terrorists after all, you know.
 
I don't see him wearing a yarmulke in the video. Must be a black one.

Okay, I guess to the eyes of an outsider who isn't used to see this sight it takes a while to spot, but he is.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Closing for review.
 
Moderator's Warning:
This is re-opened. Moderation has occurred.

Please stick to commenting on the topic in a substantive and productive manner.

 
Israel settles Palestine because some Palestinians attack soldiers who guard settlements, great reasoning.
 
Israel settles Palestine because some Palestinians attack soldiers who guard settlements, great reasoning.

FYI the Palestinians have been stabbing people seemingly indiscriminately. Soldiers have not been the exclusive target.
 
FYI the Palestinians have been stabbing people seemingly indiscriminately. Soldiers have not been the exclusive target.

And yet the OP posts a video where he apparently wants us to believe that Palestinians attacking soldiers facilitating the colonization of their territory with their guns is the reason why Israel colonized these territories in he first place.

As I said, amazing logic.

Soldiers and 'civilians' who choose to service or colonize the occupied territories deserve no sympathy.
 
And yet the OP posts a video where he apparently wants us to believe that Palestinians attacking soldiers facilitating the colonization of their territory with their guns is the reason why Israel colonized these territories in he first place.

As I said, amazing logic.

Soldiers and 'civilians' who choose to service or colonize the occupied territories deserve no sympathy.

A Palestinian man approached a group of Israelis in Jerusalem's Old City on October 3, 2015, and began stabbing, according to Israeli police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld. The attacker injured one woman and her baby, and stabbed two other members of the group to death. Israeli police shot the attacker on site, where he died. Palestinian Islamic Jihad issued a statement claiming the attacker was a member of their organization.

Comprehensive Listing of Terrorism Victims in Israel | Jewish Virtual Library

Palestinian Islamic Jihad was sufficiently proud of the attack to claim it as their own. Was the baby a legitimate target for murder, lonewolf?
 


Forgive me for not taking a source that counts soldiers killed during a military operation as "victims" of "terrorism" seriously.




Was the baby a legitimate target for murder, lonewolf?


That is a very loaded question. By definition murder is not legitimate.




In this case there is no source specifying the type of "light injury" the child sustained and how he had sustained it.
 
Forgive me for not taking a source that counts soldiers killed during a military operation as "victims" of "terrorism" seriously.







That is a very loaded question. By definition murder is not legitimate.




In this case there is no source specifying the type of "light injury" the child sustained and how he had sustained it.

So the mother and their child merit no sympathy? The two year old received a stab wound in his leg. Does that sound legitimate to you?
 
So the mother and their child merit no sympathy? The two year old received a stab wound in his leg. Does that sound legitimate to you?

Is the child capable of consent? can he choose to colonize other people's territories?

"The mother" merits scorn for not only choosing to be a colonist in the 21st century, but for endangering children by forcing them to live in occupied territories as well.

No sympathy here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom