• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

French people White Aliens?

Status
Not open for further replies.

spangledbanner

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
1,234
Reaction score
164
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
Back in the day when Australia still had our White Australia policy we considered Southern Europeans like Greeks and Italians to be 'White Aliens' because they were not of British stock. Traditionally to an Aussie a Southern European may be 'white' but we saw them as being very different. Under the White Australia policy we described Greeks, Italians, Poles and Yugoslavs as being "semi coloured" and undesirable. The reason we had the White Australia Policy was to preserve our culture. Everybody claims that it is racist but now look how everyone is worried about Islamification and loss of national culture all across Europe. Isnt what all these Europeans are saying as racist as our White Australia Policy was? Or could it be that our White Australia Policy was not racist at all?

These days you get people claiming that 'white' people are all the same which is idiotic. Southern Europeans are semi-coloured - kind of like a Mexican. We wouldnt have let Mexicans in under the White Australia Policy either. but now people claim that Southern Europeans are white. To me it is ludicrous. Southern Europeans are not 'white' and they are certainly not Teutonic stock like us Five Eye nations are traditionally. And in my opinion the French are basically Southern Europeans for the most part because the Romans conquered the Gauls. We didnt like to have French under the White Australia Policy any more than a Greek or Italian really. So arent the French White Aliens? They certainly are to me.

So doesnt the world owe Australia an apology for calling our White Australia Policy racist? All we anted to do was maintain our British heritage and protect our national identity. That is why we said no French, Italians or Greeks please.

This country shall remain forever the home of the descendants of those people who came here in peace in order to establish in the South Seas an outpost of the British race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy

Australia is part of the British race. The French certainly are not. And the Southern Europeans are not even Teuton.

The British understood our White Australia Policy -

"We quite sympathise with the determination...of these colonies...that there should not be an influx of people alien in civilisation, alien in religion, alien in customs, whose influx, moreover, would seriously interfere with the legitimate rights of the existing labouring population."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy#cite_note-9

So since the French are white aliens then why is France being made out to be some symbol of the west? They dont even speak English.

We have these bloody Europeans acting like they are the masters of the white race or something which is total bullcrap. The British Empire has become the AngloSphere is the dominant Empire. Us Five Eye nations of the British Race rule the world not the Europeans that we had to save from Teuton Germans. Why do we even put up with the Europeans at all and their uppitiness? Someone should put them in their place.

Do you agree that French people should be considered to be White Aliens? And now that we have come full circle do you support the White Australia Policy?

We used to call Southern Europeans "semi coloured". Read about it here -

Chapter 4: 'White Alien' (non-British European) Immigration - More People Imperative: Immigration to Australia, 1901–39

white australia.jpg
( google images )
 
What? The French are not "white" because they were conquered by the Romans? The same Romans who then conquered and settled in what later became England? And some of those same "non-white" French who later also conquered and settled in that same island you claim is "white"?

What are you talking about?
 
And what I really hate is these bloody Europeans trying to spread their stupid 'European' politics to our Five Eye nations. There is no way in freaking hell Australia would have allowed Dutch 'Geert Wilders' into Australia under the White Australia Policy because he is not of British Stock - yet this European comes to Australia and starts some idiotic party called 'Australia First Party' which is an anti-Muslim party and he tries to act like Australians are Europeans or something. Geert Wilders is a White Alien and he should stay the hell in Europe. He has tried to annoy you Americans as well. And we also get stuff like these stupid Greeks trying to start a Golden dawn Australia Party. Greeks are semi-coloured and not of British stock so what the hell would we want a Golden Dawn Australia for? Traditional Australia is British. There is no such thing as 'white'. Greeks are what we would call White Aliens.
 
What? The French are not "white" because they were conquered by the Romans? The same Romans who then conquered and settled in what later became England? And some of those same "non-white" French who later also conquered and settled in that same island you claim is "white"?

What are you talking about?

There was never many Southern Europeans in Britain to change their gene pool like there was in France. And the Normans were not Southern European. Germanic/Teutonic blood was dominant with British and Normans. French too probably but I still consider them to be white aliens. They dont even speak a Germanic language.
 
It was, by definition, racist.

No it wasnt. We were British so we didnt want to let coloured or semi-coloured people into our society. What is wrong with that? We could handle a few but we wanted to maintain our identity. Wanting to maintain national identity is not 'racist' in any bad way.
 
There was never many Southern Europeans in Britain to change their gene pool like there was in France. And the Normans were not Southern European. Germanic/Teutonic blood was dominant with British and Normans. French too probably but I still consider them to be white aliens. They dont even speak a Germanic language.

This doesn't make any sense.
 
No it wasnt. We were British so we didnt want to let coloured or semi-coloured people into our society. What is wrong with that? We could handle a few but we wanted to maintain our identity. Wanting to maintain national identity is not 'racist' in any bad way.

Yep, that's not racist at all. :roll:
 
No it wasnt. We were British so we didnt want to let coloured or semi-coloured people into our society. What is wrong with that? We could handle a few but we wanted to maintain our identity. Wanting to maintain national identity is not 'racist' in any bad way.

It may be a kind of racism you feel is justified, but it is still racism.
 
So, children, what we have learned so far:

1. British is a race.

2. The British race is white and is the only white race that is pure, everyone else is some other color even if they appear white. Do not be fooled!

3. The British race is not European, even though that's where it comes from. Do not be fooled!

4. There is no such thing as white, but there are White Aliens.

:prof
 
So, children, what we have learned so far:

1. British is a race.

2. The British race is white and is the only white race that is pure, everyone else is some other color even if they appear white. Do not be fooled!

3. The British race is not European, even though that's where it comes from. Do not be fooled!

4. There is no such thing as white, but there are White Aliens.

:prof

Thanks for clearing that up, I admit I was confused for a moment there. :cool:
 
This doesn't make any sense.

Well the Normans were half viking. And the Franks were not conquered by the Romans anyway. So there is not much Southern European about Normans apart from their language. But with the rest of Frecnh stock they were totally conquered by the Romans so they may be Teuton but retarded ones and an embarrassment in my opinion. Look at them in WW2 for example. Plus I didnt call them semi-coloured did I? Partially though maybe. There is a bit too much Southern European in them is what I am saying.
 
So, children, what we have learned so far:

1. British is a race.

2. The British race is white and is the only white race that is pure, everyone else is some other color even if they appear white. Do not be fooled!

3. The British race is not European, even though that's where it comes from. Do not be fooled!

4. There is no such thing as white, but there are White Aliens.

:prof

BRITISH IS barbarian RACE.
for example.people of ancien greek or roma empire or persia empire called british :barbarian.
england people have different race and they are german refugee
 
If a country wants to maintain their heritage whether it is the color of their skin, their religion, or even ideology I am OK with it. If it is the what the people want then why not have the freedom to maintain a distinct and separate heritage.

My grandfather told me an interesting story when I was 14. I asked him why he never went to church with us. He said he was forced to abandon his religion. I ask how so. He said when I married your grandmother I had to choose between my religion or hers. I looked at him confused and he continued. I was Methodist and she was Catholic and in order for us to get married one of us had to switch religions. I said well if you switched why don't you come to church with us. He said I gave it a lot of thought and decided that any religion that forces people to join their religion cannot be the true religion and that included mine as well. I said are you worried about your soul. He said I think the people who force their religion on others need to worry about their soul.
 
Last edited:
It may be a kind of racism you feel is justified, but it is still racism.

The White Australia Policy is what I would call the healthy egoism of the Australian people. What is so-called 'racism' anyway? Was this even a word before WW2? There is nothing wrong with being proud of identity and wanting to maintain it and culture. How can a nation even exist without that? Minorities would tear it apart.....

Having said that I do support multiculturalism. But I can see why some dont. And it is not as simple as saying that so-called 'white' people should band together against Muslims. There was nothing bad about the White Australia Policy even if it was 'racist' by the modern definition.

Australias real history is very multicultural. The leaders of the Eureka Rebellion included an Irishman, an Italian and an African American.
 
So, children, what we have learned so far:

1. British is a race.

2. The British race is white and is the only white race that is pure, everyone else is some other color even if they appear white. Do not be fooled!

3. The British race is not European, even though that's where it comes from. Do not be fooled!

4. There is no such thing as white, but there are White Aliens.

:prof

The British race doesnt all come from Europe. Look at Scottish people. They were there all along. Same with the original Britons before the Romans and Saxons and before the Normans. And nobody even bothered to conquer Ireland before the Normans went there. They are not 'European'.

And Southern Europeans are not Teuton. I didnt use the word "pure". But they are not Teuton. The British Race is.

edit - HA! Sottish people.
 
There was never many Southern Europeans in Britain to change their gene pool like there was in France. And the Normans were not Southern European. Germanic/Teutonic blood was dominant with British and Normans. French too probably but I still consider them to be white aliens. They dont even speak a Germanic language.

Discussions of "gene pools" have no relevance of any kind to the terrorist attacks in France. They have nothing to do with policy solutions, either. Eugenics, if that's what the message is advocating, and I sincerely hope it isn't, lacks any kind of merit or any other redeeming qualities. At the same time, no matter how terrible the attacks, they do not justify past racist policies. Indeed, such policies have more in common with the intolerant worldview of the terrorists than they do the liberal western values that took root in Western Europe and became an integral part of modern European identity.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Closed for moderator review.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom