This is unacceptable!!! You're ripping apart a family right at the moment of birth. It's either kick them all out or take them all in people!!!
They are called anchor babies, and are born here purposely to create a situation for the illegal parents to stay here. That is not what the 14th Amendment was intended to do, no law is passed to induce lawlessness. Any such interpretation is bogus.
This is unacceptable!!! You're ripping apart a family right at the moment of birth. It's either kick them all out or take them all in people!!!
If the fourteenth had a clear objective it would have named slaves instead of the much more general "persons."
You could fight to amend it, theres always that. Until then, welcome to the constitution.
This is unacceptable!!! You're ripping apart a family right at the moment of birth. It's either kick them all out or take them all in people!!!
Misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause.
This is unacceptable!!! You're ripping apart a family right at the moment of birth. It's either kick them all out or take them all in people!!!
Agreed! Send them back.
Birthright citizenship is rewarding law breakers.
Speak for yourself.
They weren't all slaves, and besides that is not much of a legal term.
They weren't all slaves, and besides that is not much of a legal term.
That's what I did. Entering this country illegally is breaking the law. Anchoring lawbreakers is rewarding illegal behavior
When the word persons was used, it opened up the amendment to interpretation for anyone, because we are all people.
No one cares if you think that person isnt much of a legal term, here is the quagmire you are in. And the only way youll be able to fix it is by amending the constitution. GL HF.
And GG for when you find that its a fruitless battle for you.
That's what I did. Entering this country illegally is breaking the law. Anchoring lawbreakers is rewarding illegal behavior
Great, we have an incentive for illegal immigration and nothing can be done about it. Good riddance to the parents then; come back legally next time!!!
I feel for the kids. They did not do anything wrong. No one is arguing that.And yet, the child who has done no lawbreaking, gets punished for the actions of another. The Child is an 'innocent', to borrow an anti-abortion label. Why are we punishing people who have committed no crime, to borrow a theory from those who oppose any new firearm regulation. The foundation of a stable society is a man and wife raising children, to borrow the claims of those opposed to SSM...
Now we don't kick out people for breaking our laws. We don't 'nuclear option' a minor offense. We have a wide variety of punishments for law breakers- from probation, through fines and community service to jail time. I'm sure we can find something less drastic than throwing otherwise good intentioned folks out of the country.
So the choice seems very clear- the 'Greater Good' is to keep the family together and not punish Innocents for the actions of others, but rather fine those who came in without proper documentation.... eace
Something can be done. Are you ignorant of the American legal system? Are you American?
The constitution can be amended.
I feel for the kids. They did not do anything wrong. No one is arguing that. But do we punish, or should the parents be held accountable? Isn't it the parents who are gambling their child's welfare? Of course by now our laws are such a joke that the odds are heavily in their favor.