• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Cost Of Serving Your Country: Deported Veterans of America

One thing people joining the military should understand is if it is not in your enlistment contract then what ever they claim is worthless. If the recruiter promises you ranger school or some other military school, money bonus, a duty station,MOS or anything else then it better be in your enlistment contract. A recruiter's promise doesn't mean anything if it is not in your contract.

That's true. The courts consider the sales pitch to be mere 'puffing.'

Puffery as a legal term refers to promotional statements and claims that express subjective rather than objective views, which no "reasonable person" would take literally.[1] Puffery serves to "puff up" an exaggerated image of what is being described and is especially featured in testimonials.

Puffery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The simple fact of the matter is this:

Whites have raped and pillaged their way to relative opulence (read: relative difference between Ireland/Greece to Guatemala or Burkina Faso) so that they have less advantage to immigrate in the *current* atmosphere.

Further the US immigration doctrine gives preference to high skilled labour (read: labour that is either a brain drain from 3rd world countries or is relatively highy prevalent in White countries that have raped both peoples, properties and environment) while also setting a static quota on immigration from country (I believe it's 1-10k a year?)

Now, let's look at neighboring nations:

Canada. If I have to explain that to you... well, I suggest you do some reading.

Mexico. See above.

Everything below Mexico until Brazil and Argentina. See above.

So you have a restrictive quota that applies to countries across the globe same as it applies to bordering countries.

Then you have exemptions for higher skilled labour that tend to come from countries that have overall extremely higher levels of development than countries that are immigrating.

I mean, think about it. If I'm a doctor in Ireland or Greece, what real gain do I have to make, besides getting rid of my close relatives, by moving to America?

Now if I'm some piss-poor farmer who can't feed his family in Mexico/El Salvador/Rwanda I have a real economic benefit by moving, even after I pay taxes and living expenses and saving to bring more of my family over while also being able to provide for the people back in my homeland.

I cannot provide evidence outside the bounds of common sense, and for that I am sorry that the entire breath of Research on the subject has such a dearth on an issue so very important.

But I don't think it takes much inference to put two and two together.

Skilled workers are the third preference for immigration:

The First Steps toward an Immigrant Visa: Labor Certification and Filing a Petition
Employment First Preference (E1): Priority Workers
Employment Second Preference (E2): Professionals Holding Advanced Degrees and Persons of Exceptional Ability
Employment Third Preference (E3): Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Unskilled Workers (Other Workers)
Employment Fourth Preference (E4): Certain Special Immigrants
Employment Fifth Preference (E5): Immigrant Investors
Employment-Based Immigrant Visa
 
Immigration policy may change, but the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and the law regarding citizenship for serving honorably in the military hasn't. That's why Obama is Naturalizing a bunch of vets tomorrow live at the White House, which other than being a political move, is a great thing.

If an immigrant veteran is convicted of a crime BEFORE he is naturalized, then deportation is certainly legal. There is no obligation to keep criminals in the country. It shouldn't be all that hard to keep your nose clean until your papers come through. Of perhaps they just assumed they were automatically naturalized and didn't apply for their papers.
 
I just think if you join the military under all those promises they give you and then say "well **** you, you were part of the machine, your were a cog now GTFO" is just absolutely terrible.

You'd have a point, if the content of the promise was as simple as you say it is. It's not.
 
If an immigrant veteran is convicted of a crime BEFORE he is naturalized, then deportation is certainly legal. There is no obligation to keep criminals in the country. It shouldn't be all that hard to keep your nose clean until your papers come through. Of perhaps they just assumed they were automatically naturalized and didn't apply for their papers.

Actually, since 2009 they are Naturalized during Basic Training, but... if they break the law prior to their date of release from military duty, their citizenship can be revoked, and they can be deported.

These guys had to have done something. Broken some law. Did something, to have their citizenship revoked.

Like I said before, unless they produce their DD-214's, I tend to not believe them.
 
Actually, since 2009 they are Naturalized during Basic Training, but... if they break the law prior to their date of release from military duty, their citizenship can be revoked, and they can be deported.

These guys had to have done something. Broken some law. Did something, to have their citizenship revoked.

Like I said before, unless they produce their DD-214's, I tend to not believe them.

Good information.
 
they are deported for a reason. TFB.

Make sure their family JOINS THEM..........so we cant be accused of "spliting familys":...........LMAO!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom