So what, should we have executed all one million of the members of the
Schutzstaffel? It might feel righteous to do that, but "an eye for an eye" actually, it turns out, isn't the best way to live your life. Note that most of them were not ever tried or attempted to be tried:
"The first, and best known of these trials, described as "the greatest trial in history" by Norman Birkett, one of the British judges who presided over it,[1] was the trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal (IMT). Held between 20 November 1945 and 1 October 1946,[2] the Tribunal was given the task of trying 23 of the most important political and military leaders of the Third Reich".
There were follow-up Nuremberg trials, which resulted in only ~180 people being tried, and only 24 being sentenced to death. They didn't try 1 million SS members. They didn't even execute most of the people who were at the top of the SS.
Look, it's one thing to not be sorry that Eichmann is dead. It's one thing to think the man was a depraved bastard. It's quite another to glorify how the West "humiliated" this person before we/Israel executed him. That's a pretty vicious way to look at history, looking at it through the lens of "They're evil, **** 'em all to death." That's the type of black-and-white, moral-absolutist, the-ends-justify-the-means thinking which, if left long enough, turns into the same kinds of justifications that were used for the holocaust and similar atrocities. It's just gaudy to be so joyful about the humiliation and termination of another human being's life.