- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
which was referred to the relevant subcommittee of congress a couple weeks ago? This law would remove sound suppressors from the 1934 NFA -meaning people wouldn't have to pay a 200 dollar "tax" stamp fee to the ATF and wait up to a year to buy a suppressor
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/3799
I strongly support this law and I note that in ENGLAND you can buy these things for hunting rifles. CRIME CONTROL-in the sense of violent crime was not the motivation for the restrictions-rather Depression era game wardens SPECULATED that poor people would use the suppressors to poach deer.
The current law is stupid and needs to be eliminated or at least modified for suppressors
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/3799
I strongly support this law and I note that in ENGLAND you can buy these things for hunting rifles. CRIME CONTROL-in the sense of violent crime was not the motivation for the restrictions-rather Depression era game wardens SPECULATED that poor people would use the suppressors to poach deer.
The current law is stupid and needs to be eliminated or at least modified for suppressors