why don't you tell us how to get the public who do not own guns to be part of that voice. I do what I can. there are at least 20 good people in Ohio who are gun owners because of me. and they all voted against hillary
OK here goes again.
Forget everything you know about winning or fighting for our rights. It's wrong proven thousands of times wrong.
First of all figure if firearm owners have something to be proud of or are they ashamed to be owners or supporters?
If the are ashamed, best fix that real soon and quickly with correct education and example.
What have they to be proud of? They are by far the least likely to commit crime.
How does that work in our favour and get public attention? It should not be a question a it is obvious, citizens the public and deluded firearm owners want to be safe, Who is the safest group of people?
How does this safety work in citizens favour.
Umbrella effect, prevention of crime as a danger and threat to completion of crime and a psychological barrier to criminals attacking citizens, ie confrontational crime.
In a nut shell. No pun intended.
Our image stinks fix it. The public needs to know they are better off with firearm ownership than without and this presents far more safety to them than relying on the police and government.
That is how easy this is. Perhaps to easy but tossed because it is totally different to conventional thinking.
I will repeat we cannot win without public support best we work on gaining that support before gun control completely radicalises the public
The worst thing we can do is fuel gun controls propaganda by mentioning more guns, unceasing owners unless in a public positive way or saying buzz off we are protected by the constitution.
Our PRO needs work, lots of it.