• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"gun rights" [W:41]

S

ScrewPokemonGo

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
162
Reaction score
9
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Guns have no rights. They are inanimate objects incapable of emotion or thought. As such these non living things have no rights to life like humans do. Please stop using the term gun rights. It's absurd. If you feel guns are people, then arrest them for mass murder.
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

ScrewPokemonGo said:
Guns have no rights. They are inanimate objects incapable of emotion or thought. As such these non living things have no rights to life like humans do. Please stop using the term gun rights. It's absurd. If you feel guns are people, then arrest them for mass murder.
Click to expand...

I don't use the term "gun rights." I use the term "2nd Amendment Right," or "The Right to Keep and Bear Arms."

It's actually the anti-gun folks that blame guns as if they are to blame for the actions of people, by using terms like Gun Control, as if guns themselves are running around the streets kiiling people and therefore must be controlled.
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

^
Jackass nazi who hated democracy
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

Beaudreaux said:
I don't use the term "gun rights." I use the term "2nd Amendment Right," or "The Right to Keep and Bear Arms."

It's actually the anti-gun folks that blame guns as if they are to blame for the actions of people, by using terms like Gun Control, as if guns themselves are running around the streets kiiling people and therefore must be controlled.
Click to expand...

Don't bother wasting your time. This one's a special case.
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

The right to bear arms is a misunderstanding in modern times.









What it MEANT was that you have the right to possess the arms of a bear. Ie the right to bear arms
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

ScrewPokemonGo said:
Guns have no rights. They are inanimate objects incapable of emotion or thought. As such these non living things have no rights to life like humans do. Please stop using the term gun rights. It's absurd. If you feel guns are people, then arrest them for mass murder.
Click to expand...

People kill people, so they should all have access to nukes?
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

ScrewPokemonGo said:
Guns have no rights. They are inanimate objects incapable of emotion or thought. As such these non living things have no rights to life like humans do. Please stop using the term gun rights. It's absurd. If you feel guns are people, then arrest them for mass murder.
Click to expand...

Fascinating. What's your thoughts on the polar ice shelf?
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

I like when I start to read a thread and it fails within just a few words.

The term "gun rights' doesn't mean guns have rights, but that people have a right to guns. I fail to understand how that isn't obvious.
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

ScrewPokemonGo said:
Nice photo shop skills
Click to expand...

What?

anime-confused-gif.gif
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

Henrin said:
I like when I start to read a thread and it fails within just a few words.

The term "gun rights' doesn't mean guns have rights, but that people have a right to guns. I fail to understand how that isn't obvious.
Click to expand...

Take a look at this guy's previous posts/threads. This thread was bound to fail before it even started.
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

I'm a big defender of the right of citizens to carry self protection, even in the form of firearms but there's a limit to when that personal freedom infringes upon the safety of others. And it's something that needs regulation to some degree. But restricting law abiding people from firearms that are easily attained by criminals isn't a fair situation either. As with most issues there's a compromise.
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

grip said:
I'm a big defender of the right of citizens to carry self protection, even in the form of firearms but there's a limit to when that personal freedom infringes upon the safety of others. And it's something that needs regulation to some degree. But restricting law abiding people from firearms that are easily attained by criminals isn't a fair situation either. As with most issues there's a compromise.
Click to expand...
If you disarm the criminals first, it will work. I assure you
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

she-pooted-in.jpg
 
re: "gun rights" [W:41]

farting_o_144375.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom