• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Second Amendment works again

jet57 said:
None of what you've just sad negates what I posted. Why can't you just accept that it's obvious that a gun is not necessary. Your armchair quarterbacking has no way of being correct, and you know that.
Click to expand...

So now you directly make the claim that you implied to begin with, but claimed you werent making.

The only thing you showed was that in those specific circumstances a gun was not used. Not even that it was not necessary. None of those anecdotal situations apply generally.

By what means do you expect a woman to fend off 3 armed men?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Aberration said:
So now you directly make the claim that you implied to begin with, but claimed you werent making.

The only thing you showed was that in those specific circumstances a gun was not used. Not even that it was not necessary. None of those anecdotal situations apply generally.

By what means do you expect a woman to fend off 3 armed men?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

do what liberal gun haters tell her to do-pee her pants and hope it grosses the attackers out and they leave

remember, to liberal bannerrhoid movement members, its morally superior for the police to find a woman raped and strangled with her own pantyhose than to be interviewing a woman in a torn dress and asking her why some guy is lying in front of her with his johnson hanging out and with 3 9mm holes in his chest.
 
I just hope Karma finds these douche bags and they get to experience it first hand. And I wont shed one single tear.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
jet57 said:
None of what you've just sad negates what I posted. Why can't you just accept that it's obvious that a gun is not necessary. Your armchair quarterbacking has no way of being correct, and you know that.
Click to expand...

Alright, then why don't you tell your son this? Tell him that he should not be carrying guns around. After all, no one needs a gun to stop a robbery in progress.

.
.
.

Yeah...that's what I thought. Excuse time of why a cop needs a gun!
 
Kal'Stang said:
Alright, then why don't you tell your son this? Tell him that he should not be carrying guns around. After all, no one needs a gun to stop a robbery in progress.

.
.
.

Yeah...that's what I thought. Excuse time of why a cop needs a gun!
Click to expand...

this argument of his is what happens when you make a silly argument and rather than abandoning it, you cannot give it up. Its like a kid who tells all his friends he has the best dog in the world and when they demand to see something he doesn't have, he goes to the pound to try to find a dog but all that is left is one flea bitten mangy mutt. SO rather than admitting he doesn't have a prize pooch, he takes that mangy mutt home and tells everyone who sees it-that the dog is a sure winner at the Westminster Kennel Club show.

Jet doesn't have any argument. All of us self defense experts know that the best odds a victim can have is to be armed at the time of an attack and the best arm to have is usually a firearm. To claim a firearm is never needed is trying to make the mangy mutt look like a show champion. Its a dog pure and simple
 
Kal'Stang said:
Alright, then why don't you tell your son this? Tell him that he should not be carrying guns around. After all, no one needs a gun to stop a robbery in progress.

.
.
.

Yeah...that's what I thought. Excuse time of why a cop needs a gun!
Click to expand...

The load road again eh?
 
Kal'Stang said:
I take it that this is an admission that you won't tell your son that he shouldn't carry a gun anymore because guns are not needed for self protection?
Click to expand...

No, you're tot take as you having to scrape the bottom of the barrel in order to try and be right.


:2wave:
 
Aberration said:
Your kids a cop? Wow. You got your ass handed to you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Nope. It's his job to carry a gun. It's not Kal's, or your's, or mine. It's part of his uniform, and do you think he would rather come upon people with or without guns?
 
jet57 said:
When and how did I suggest that.

I have shown a fact; that it does not take a gun to defeat an armed robber.
Click to expand...

You haven't shown ****. What you have proven is that I don't want to be anywhere around you during an armed robbery.

His third student in America, Skip Ellsworth, along with LeRoy Garcia, taught Bruce how to shoot pistols, revolvers, rifles, and shotguns. And how to drive.
“I loaned Bruce one of my own guns, a very small ‘antique’ Colt .25 Caliber semi-automatic pistol with black handle-grips,” said Ellsworth. “He carried that piece for at least a couple of years.”
Lee’s friend and student Jesse Glover confirms that he was a crack shot. Lee related his belief in handguns during a 1968 interview on on the Pierre Berton Show in 1971.
“Nowadays you don’t go around on the street kicking people, punching people,” said Lee. “Because if you do (makes gun shape with hand), well that’s it — I don’t care how good you are.”
This scene from Enter the Dragon reflects his attitude towards firearms.
Click to expand...
7 things you didn’t know about Bruce Lee Page 2

quote-nowadays-you-don-t-go-around-on-the-street-kicking-people-punching-people-because-if-bruce.jpg

I hope this will put an end to your idiotic idea that everyone should go Ninja on a person with a gun. I bet it won't however.
 
jet57 said:
Sure it does:

View attachment 67207779
Click to expand...

I guess you now think that people should pet bears. That is even more stupider than the "nobody needs a gun" statement. You haven't reached a stupidest statement yet. I am sure it will be further down in the thread.
 
jet57 said:
Sure it does:

View attachment 67207779
Click to expand...

How cute. I suggest you try that on your next trip to Yellowstone then post pictures to prove your theory. That would show all the nay sayers wouldn't it. If you have the guts to try that is.
 
jet57 said:
Nope. It's his job to carry a gun. It's not Kal's, or your's, or mine. It's part of his uniform, and do you think he would rather come upon people with or without guns?
Click to expand...

Why does he need a gun to perform his job Jet? Given they are shot by their own firearm in many instances, wouldn't it be safer not to carry a gun? Guess guts is not part of his job requirement eh?
 
jet57 said:
No, you're tot take as you having to scrape the bottom of the barrel in order to try and be right.


:2wave:
Click to expand...

And yet you still will not admit that you will not tell/ask him to stop carrying a gun. Because you know I'm right. And so is everyone else that is telling you how wrong you are.
 
jet57 said:
Nope. It's his job to carry a gun. It's not Kal's, or your's, or mine. It's part of his uniform, and do you think he would rather come upon people with or without guns?
Click to expand...

Police in the UK dont carry guns. Why would he need a gun to come upon people? Its criminals. And just like him NONE of us should have to come upon a criminal without a gun. That is the very point.

The question remains. What do you expect a woman to do when she comes upon 3 armed criminals?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Aberration said:
Police in the UK dont carry guns. Why would he need a gun to come upon people? Its criminals. And just like him NONE of us should have to come upon a criminal without a gun. That is the very point.

The question remains. What do you expect a woman to do when she comes upon 3 armed criminals?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Jet expects women folk to rely on their men folk to provide protection or just be good victims and try to live long enough to be a good witness. He prefers his women soft and squishy.
 
Kal'Stang said:
And yet you still will not admit that you will not tell/ask him to stop carrying a gun. Because you know I'm right. And so is everyone else that is telling you how wrong you are.
Click to expand...

The video I posted proves that you are not right Kal.
 
jet57 said:
The video I posted proves that you are not right Kal.
Click to expand...

Then tell your son to stop carrying guns while in the line of duty. If I'm wrong, and you're right then you should have no problem telling him that.
 
Kal'Stang said:
Then tell your son to stop carrying guns while in the line of duty. If I'm wrong, and you're right then you should have no problem telling him that.
Click to expand...

:2wave:
 
jet57 said:
Nope. It's his job to carry a gun. It's not Kal's, or your's, or mine. It's part of his uniform, and do you think he would rather come upon people with or without guns?
Click to expand...

You said no one ever needs a gun, so there is no need for your kid to carry a gun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom