• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Second Amendment works again

jdog said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/surveillance-footage-shows-woman-returning-180500864.html

This lady was able to successfully defend herself because of her right to be armed. This is what the Second Amendment is all about. All the gun control advocates can go straight to hell.
Click to expand...

The video at the link didn't show her at all, just the perps...but I did see it on the nightly news recently.

I like her moxy, and fully support her actions.....but once the perps flee, in some states, you have to hold fire.
 
jdog said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/surveillance-footage-shows-woman-returning-180500864.html

This lady was able to successfully defend herself because of her right to be armed. This is what the Second Amendment is all about. All the gun control advocates can go straight to hell.
Click to expand...

I watched and read the entire story. ... This woman should be put to death for murder. She killed one of them, or more accurately, her gun killed one man.

This is further proof that the confiscation of ALL firearms is needed immediately. She would not have had to fear them and murder them, if neither they nor she had access to a damn gun!
Further proof that any trump supporter is absolutely insane!
Clearly fire arm registration prevents absolutely nothing!
 
ScrewPokemonGo said:
I watched and read the entire story. ... This woman should be put to death for murder. She killed one of them, or more accurately, her gun killed one man.

This is further proof that the confiscation of ALL firearms is needed immediately. She would not have had to fear them and murder them, if neither they nor she had access to a damn gun!
Further proof that any trump supporter is absolutely insane!
Clearly fire arm registration prevents absolutely nothing!
Click to expand...

you're wrong of course. the bullet killed the person. how many people would die if all guns were to be immediately confiscated?

but you are right-arms registration is worthless other than to help confiscate guns


I love your posts, they do more for the pro gun movement than many of the NRA mailings I see
 
jet57 said:
You don't need a gun to beat an armed robber, just guts:


Click to expand...
To be clear...you are suggesting that woman in her home should have just had the guts to go hand to hand with three home invaders?
 
ScrewPokemonGo said:
I watched and read the entire story. ... This woman should be put to death for murder. She killed one of them, or more accurately, her gun killed one man.

This is further proof that the confiscation of ALL firearms is needed immediately. She would not have had to fear them and murder them, if neither they nor she had access to a damn gun!
Further proof that any trump supporter is absolutely insane!
Clearly fire arm registration prevents absolutely nothing!
Click to expand...

You've been screwing Pokemon, haven't you?
 
VanceMack said:
To be clear...you are suggesting that woman in her home should have just had the guts to go hand to hand with three home invaders?
Click to expand...

When and how did I suggest that.

I have shown a fact; that it does not take a gun to defeat an armed robber.
 
jet57 said:
When and how did I suggest that.

I have shown a fact; that it does not take a gun to defeat an armed robber.
Click to expand...
No...you posted one incident to counter a home invasion instance where the law abiding citizen defended herself. So...are you in fact saying her actions were correct and justified? And if so...why do you feel compelled to make some other ridiculous anti gun argument?
 
ScrewPokemonGo said:
I watched and read the entire story. ... This woman should be put to death for murder. She killed one of them, or more accurately, her gun killed one man.

This is further proof that the confiscation of ALL firearms is needed immediately. She would not have had to fear them and murder them, if neither they nor she had access to a damn gun!
Further proof that any trump supporter is absolutely insane!
Clearly fire arm registration prevents absolutely nothing!
Click to expand...

So if the thugs didnt have guns, they could not have posed a threat to the woman?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
jet57 said:
You don't need a gun to beat an armed robber, just guts:


Click to expand...


:doh

so if you are 65 year old man in poor health, all you need is guts to fight off say a 28 year old man.

this is the same kind of thinking the japanese used during WWII, BUSHIDO, thinking because they were brave soldiers, they would over come bullets and could win, and its stupid
 
VanceMack said:
No...you posted one incident to counter a home invasion instance where the law abiding citizen defended herself. So...are you in fact saying her actions were correct and justified? And if so...why do you feel compelled to make some other ridiculous anti gun argument?
Click to expand...

I have posted several incidents of gutsy unarmed people, including women, defending themselves and beating an armed robber.

What' if she'd just had a big dog?

Not anti-gun, just factual.
 
Master PO said:
:doh

so if you are 65 year old man in poor health, all you need is guts to fight off say a 28 year old man.

this is the same kind of thinking the japanese used during WWII, BUSHIDO, thinking because they were brave soldiers, they would over come bullets and could win, and its stupid
Click to expand...

The video, and others like this that I've posted show you everything you need to know.
 
jet57 said:
I have posted several incidents of gutsy unarmed people, including women, defending themselves and beating an armed robber.

What' if she'd just had a big dog?

Not anti-gun, just factual.
Click to expand...
gotcha. You would want your sister, mother, or boyfriend fighting off three guys in the middle of the night unarmed. Well...thats...something...I guess.
 
VanceMack said:
gotcha. You would want your sister, mother, or boyfriend fighting off three guys in the middle of the night unarmed. Well...thats...something...I guess.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry; "gotcha"?

With what? Your make-believe?
 
Master PO said:
you think guts can defeat bullets, which is stupid
Click to expand...

The video speaks for itself dude.

Here it is again:



The victim has no gun and needs no bullets.

That's a fact.
 
VanceMack said:
gotcha. You would want your sister, mother, or boyfriend fighting off three guys in the middle of the night unarmed. Well...thats...something...I guess.
Click to expand...

I'd want my relatives to hide, call the cops, stay safe, and if they got away then collect the insurance payout for any stolen items.
 
Nilly said:
I'd want my relatives to hide, call the cops, stay safe, and if they got away then collect the insurance payout for any stolen items.
Click to expand...
And what if they werent just there for the cash and family heirlooms?
 
jet57 said:
The video speaks for itself dude.

Here it is again:



The victim has no gun and needs no bullets.

That's a fact.
Click to expand...


so, i guess you mean a victim never needs a guns, even when he is confronted with one by a robber, that the victim own guts can defeat the firearm of the robber
 
Last edited:
Master PO said:
so, i guess you mean a victim never needs a guns, even when i is confronted with one by a robber, that the victim own guts can defeat the firearm of the robber
Click to expand...

People never NEED guns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom