- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 5,289
- Reaction score
- 1,353
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Sheriff Babeu to Obama: Gun control won't stop mass shootings - YouTube
If you have the time to watch this....those for or against, your input would be interesting...
This video some what breaks my heart...... I work closely, with "Loss/risk Control"
We evaluate the risk and find measure to implement to avoid and future losses. I would think with an infinite budget and some of the smartest people in the world....... while not a simple solution a proper solution would be reasonable...
Fast forward to..... 3:50 for my initial point...
POTUS points out about an individual in China that was similarly unstable as the individual in Newtown, but because he had a knife, "most of them survived" because he did not have a semi automatic firearm.
So you are telling me, that just because he did not have a firearm, that makes the situation better? Because the was "less" loss of life that makes the situation better?
LOL..... I cannot believe what I am hearing.
Again as loss/risk control would take a look is there a constant factor? YES, Yes there is, an unstable person.... how do we handle these unstable people... Secondly, prior too, he discusses the Newtown individual that was unstable had "access" to an "Arsenal", the Next Loss/risk control question is, how did a young person that legally has no registration weapons to their name have "ACCESS" to this arsenal? Human Failure, yet again..... Firearms to be blamed for this, but yet a crazy person with a "Knife" constitute success in gun control....... common.....
Go back to the 3:10, He speaks about criminals, we dont know who or when criminals act. YET again going to another post.... we are being reactive, and not ProActive, why do we have to wait till a person, becomes an criminal before we act? Loss Control is the intent to prevent future losses. Why are we not implementing education, laws, help to those that need help PRIOR to them acting out or becoming a criminal......
we can blame firearms all we want.... but it takes a simple human trait to be derailed and the next thing you know they will have a firearm, knife, baseball bat etc.... but because a knife, baseball bat is not a firearm it makes it all better???
Thoughts?
If you have the time to watch this....those for or against, your input would be interesting...
This video some what breaks my heart...... I work closely, with "Loss/risk Control"
We evaluate the risk and find measure to implement to avoid and future losses. I would think with an infinite budget and some of the smartest people in the world....... while not a simple solution a proper solution would be reasonable...
Fast forward to..... 3:50 for my initial point...
POTUS points out about an individual in China that was similarly unstable as the individual in Newtown, but because he had a knife, "most of them survived" because he did not have a semi automatic firearm.
So you are telling me, that just because he did not have a firearm, that makes the situation better? Because the was "less" loss of life that makes the situation better?
LOL..... I cannot believe what I am hearing.
Again as loss/risk control would take a look is there a constant factor? YES, Yes there is, an unstable person.... how do we handle these unstable people... Secondly, prior too, he discusses the Newtown individual that was unstable had "access" to an "Arsenal", the Next Loss/risk control question is, how did a young person that legally has no registration weapons to their name have "ACCESS" to this arsenal? Human Failure, yet again..... Firearms to be blamed for this, but yet a crazy person with a "Knife" constitute success in gun control....... common.....
Go back to the 3:10, He speaks about criminals, we dont know who or when criminals act. YET again going to another post.... we are being reactive, and not ProActive, why do we have to wait till a person, becomes an criminal before we act? Loss Control is the intent to prevent future losses. Why are we not implementing education, laws, help to those that need help PRIOR to them acting out or becoming a criminal......
we can blame firearms all we want.... but it takes a simple human trait to be derailed and the next thing you know they will have a firearm, knife, baseball bat etc.... but because a knife, baseball bat is not a firearm it makes it all better???
Thoughts?