Re: Why Gun Nuts Lie - I Know From Experience
1. Good luck with those "proper authorities." They didn't seem to do a hell of a lot of good at Charlie Hebdo, or in Belgium, or at the other Paris mass murder, or with the African savages who butchered the soldier in England, or with Theo Van Gogh, or last week at the airport in Istanbul, or with a couple dozen other mass murders of unbelievers that those nice refugees you like to help carried out in the name of Allah.
That is a nonsense argument. Murders take place all over the world, terrorist attacks take place all over the world, atrocities take place all over the world. And yes, some happen in countries where the public does not have guns, but a whole crap load of them happen in countries where a lot of people do own guns.
Owning a gun does not protect you from a terror attack at an airport because people are not allowed to carry guns in airports, because those guns could just as easily be used for illegal purposes.
Gun ownership is no protection either from any of these crimes, not from Charlie Hebdo, not Belgium, France, the UK, the US, the Netherlands.
It is virtually impossible to protect a murderer who has made his mind up about wanting to kill somebody. No armed police nor armed civilians will usually stop one person who is really motivated to kill someone.
2. Guns can't prevent terrorist mass murders here, when they are committed in areas where guns are not allowed........... In Israel, on the other hand, Arab jihadists have often been killed by armed civilians before they could get very far along in their murder sprees.
And would owning a gun have protected them for sure? Or would the good guy with the gun have been mowed down by the police when they arrived because they have no idea who is a good guy with a gun or a bad guy with a gun. And terrorist mass murders are a rarity.
Regular shooting sprees however are much more common and they will kill where ever they want to strike.
3. Call it whatever you want. Islamist sons of whores have infested much of Europe, where, true to the supremacist nature of their beliefs,....... If Europeans are foolish enough to commit cultural suicide, that's their lookout. All the same to me.
I am certainly not going to call it what you call it. And supremacist? Sure, you know like white supremacists? Or Christian supremacists? Sadly too may people think they are better than others when usually the truth is in the middle. I hate fundamentalist Islam, but that does not mean I disagree with the fundamental right of people to be free to choose their own religion and practice it. And I am an atheist but still believe that is a fundamental right. But like today it came out that a Wahhabist group had bought a building to house a school in there in according with their strict Islamic views (which prevent integration), who was the first party to protest, right, the social democrat party who wants to scrap the plans for this school. The person who was the spokesperson (and the guy who took the initiative to do so) was Ahmed Marcouch. He is a Muslim himself (or from Muslim descent) and he thinks that people in the Netherlands are too naive about Wahhabism.
You see, just because someone is a Muslim does not make them what you claim they are nor are they infesting Europe.
4. Many Americans are concerned with preserving their individual, fundamental right to keep and bear arms, just as they are concerned with, for example, preserving their individual, fundamental right to free speech. What laws and opinions foreigners choose are up to them. They are the ones who have to live with the consequences of their choices.
You seem I love fundamental rights, but fundamental rights can violate the fundamental rights of others, that is why even fundamental rights cannot be absolute. And sadly I have noticed that there are people in every country (even in my own country) who do not care about fundamental rights but who have become fundamentalists about rights, some are fundamentalist about free speech (like Geert Wilders, but sadly only when he is talking).
Being fundamentalist about rights can be equally disruptive as people who are religious or political fundamentalists. Nothing that say fundamentalist before it IMHO is a good thing.
eace
