• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

9th Circuit Court of Appeals Says No Right to Concealed Gun Carry

TurtleDude said:
there is no compelling reason to ban concealed weapons

carrying weapons concealed is better than openly in most cases.
Click to expand...

If the Progressive want Open Carry that badly, let them have it.
 
cpgrad08 said:
If the Progressive want Open Carry that badly, let them have it.
Click to expand...

LOL, they want only the government and their constituents (black street criminals) carrying firearms
 
DifferentDrummr said:
And neither you nor Turdle has any evidence that Congress can ever adjudicate a court case.
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are babbling about. What claim did I make other than the fact you had no evidence and that is a fact.

Do you know what a strawman looks like? If so then stop constructing them
 
Crimefree said:
I have no idea what you are babbling about. What claim did I make other than the fact you had no evidence and that is a fact.

Do you know what a strawman looks like? If so then stop constructing them
Click to expand...

How's that alternate reality working out for you?
 
DifferentDrummr said:
How's that alternate reality working out for you?
Click to expand...

You mean the paranoid insane world you and other gun control advocates have taken up as home? Don't know I never go there. I keep failing the entrance exam. Do guns go out and kill people always gets a no. Do I believe taking away the victims of crimes' best means of defence will make them safer, always gets a no. Do I think we should judge and punish innocent people in some vain oppressive and idiotic way to try and prevent what cannot be prevented that way, no again. Apparently if I want to live in that sick world I have to answer yes. What's is it like there?
 
Crimefree said:
You mean the paranoid insane world you and other gun control advocates have taken up as home? Don't know I never go there. I keep failing the entrance exam. Do guns go out and kill people always gets a no. Do I believe taking away the victims of crimes' best means of defence will make them safer, always gets a no. Do I think we should judge and punish innocent people in some vain oppressive and idiotic way to try and prevent what cannot be prevented that way, no again. Apparently if I want to live in that sick world I have to answer yes. What's is it like there?
Click to expand...

Congratulations, you just demonstrated what a strawman looks like! :applaud
 
DifferentDrummr said:
Congratulations, you just demonstrated what a strawman looks like! :applaud
Click to expand...

There you go again so let me give you an opportunity to show how brilliant and honest you are. Explain this strawman I create that you claim exists and let us see how honest you are.

Claiming I created a strawman in order to challenge what I had written without actually addressing it was a very nice demonstration by you of what a straw man actually is. So thanks for being so kind as to create another strawman to demonstrate how fond you are of doing so.
 
Crimefree said:
There you go again so let me give you an opportunity to show how brilliant and honest you are. Explain this strawman I create that you claim exists and let us see how honest you are.

Claiming I created a strawman in order to challenge what I had written without actually addressing it was a very nice demonstration by you of what a straw man actually is. So thanks for being so kind as to create another strawman to demonstrate how fond you are of doing so.
Click to expand...

Who's babbling now? You demand that I explain something and then claim my explanation is wrong before I even gave it. :screwy
 
MickeyW said:
A divided federal appeals court in California ruled Thursday that there is no constitutional right to carry a concealed handgun, adding to a division among the lower courts on gun rights outside the home.

By a vote of 7-4, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld a California law that requires gun owners to show a good reason before they can get a license to carry a concealed handgun.

"The protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public."

9th Circuit Court of Appeals Says No Right to Concealed Gun Carry - NBC News
Click to expand...

The 9th Circuit Court , the most maligned court in the federal judiciary. It's routine for decisions to be reversed and labeled "inexplicable" ! :shock:
 
Socrates1 said:
The 9th Circuit Court , the most maligned court in the federal judiciary. It's routine for decisions to be reversed and labeled "inexplicable" ! :shock:
Click to expand...


Yep. That's what you get with liberals.........oatmeal and other mush.
 
DifferentDrummr said:
Who's babbling now? You demand that I explain something and then claim my explanation is wrong before I even gave it. :screwy
Click to expand...

Shatteringly dumb response.

You wrote this? A grade one school child could have told you I challenged you to explain what you claimed I had written previously was a strawman. You do remember doing so without any explanation. I went on to state that your false claim was a good example of a strawman argument and it is. You avoided responding by claiming my argument was a strawman. Got it. I could try to break it down to four letter words for you and a few prompt cards.

You are impotent to prove your claim. My guess is because you cannot as evidenced by your obvious deflection. Cognitive dissonance.

You have written no explanation. You were challenged to do so. You are the one babbling in order to avoid that. Anything else you want to know?
 
Last edited:
Crimefree said:
Shatteringly dumb response.

You wrote this? A grade one school child could have told you I challenged you to explain what you claimed I had written previously was a strawman. You do remember doing so without any explanation. I went on to state that your false claim was a good example of a strawman argument and it is. You avoided responding by claiming my argument was a strawman. Got it. I could try to break it down to four letter words for you and a few prompt cards.

You are impotent to prove your claim. My guess is because you cannot as evidenced by your obvious deflection. Cognitive dissonance.

You have written no explanation. You were challenged to do so. You are the one babbling in order to avoid that. Anything else you want to know?
Click to expand...

Speaking of dumb responses, "shatteringly" isn't even a word.

Every statement you made in #108 is a strawman: you fabricated an alternate reality that has no relationship to anything I said in this thread, then implied that I lived there. Claim proved.

Not that there's much point, since you never listen to anything but what you already wanted to hear. I'm done with your infantile blubbering about this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom