• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

‘The Bullet Box’ Is an Option If the Ballot Box Fails, Says Gun-Rights Advocate

No, actually it doesn't. Corporations do, Citizens United does, a lot of things make it damn near impossible to effectively spread the idea of gathering an overwhelming consensus that represents a means to an end and a moral imperative.
But da gubmint ain't one of them.

Good grief do some research and check your responses first.


18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
 
---I truly have a love/hate relationship with the whole "fully informed jury/jury nullification" concept because it's brilliant, it's effective, it's noble...and it is abused so very very much. No, I am not a lawyer, so I am not able to grant you any long laundry list of citations, very sorry.
Just think "all-white southern jury presiding over anything involving a black man in pre-1964 Alabama, Mississippi", etc., then extrapolate to today.
I assure you, it's more love than hate though, because it does sometimes empower juries to make wiser and more moral decisions.

Guns cannot and will not ever be confiscated en masse in this country.
Obama, Hillary, any liberal president you can name or imagine, cannot and will not make it happen and neither will any right wing president.
If it was ever going to happen, it would have happened back when there were less than 10 million firearms in private hands.
The cost of confiscating 310 million guns is a logistical and fiscal impossibility.
There are not and never will be enough personnel to do the job.
And perhaps that's a good thing because it means we'd better learn how to control our loonies, our ammosexuals and our democracy haters a lot better.
That way SANE, legal and law abiding gun owners can breathe easier too.
Not all of us hide in our basements or gather at bird sanctuaries waiting for the order to come from the head Oath Smeller or "Constitution Sheriff" and not all of us are wearing out our printers filing nuisance lawsuits.

I think you guys are just dabbling.
If you were serious, you'd get off the interwebs, which are an assault on your freedom by admiralty courts anyway, and you'd become "Freemen On The Land" and start using CAPITAL LETTERS and colons:in:a:very:earnest:manner...because your rights as living, breathing natural men on the land are under attack, your legal fictions are being auctioned off to the Queen of England and you are losing your chance to access your Treasury Direct Accounts.

ACCEPTED FOR VALUE under Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 and for all:

:::checkerboard-strangler:: of the strangler-family::: <<<---written in REDink to cancel any interference by the admiralty courts!!!

Like most you cannot conceive of anything other than a big bang theory and proceed to proclaim it can never happen because of this narrow minded asinine approach. Do you think for one moment that government or gun control do not know that a one time onslaught would be met with resistance and huge difficulties. In general restriction on ownership will remove a great deal piece by piece and prevent new sales. Bit by bit the number of gun owners as is happening right now. They will be whittled away until here are to few left and they will also have been trained to obey without question any law in order to save their guns. The last will be the elitist suckups that fought every attempt by firearm owners to resist. The collaborators and appeasers. Want an example take a look at England or South Africa as two recent examples. In both those counties you could not get ten elitist current firearm owners to object to their gun control laws in any meaningful way. They are all begging government to make the laws less strict by showing what good boys and girls they are.

Buying your first gun

idea to help promote gun ownership - Page 2

Those who promote opposition are castigated and banned if they do not stop by gun owners themselves to frightened in case the police refuse them a licence. Elitists in every sense.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom