• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control... [W:137]

Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

No I spend countess posts trying to correct lies from people who simply do not have a clue what I think but seek to try and falsely convince others they do. Get over it, there is no way you can know what I think and your claims you do are really patently stupid.

I see no LIE that you have ever found in any of my posts.

The fact that you spend so much time with my posts shows conclusively that you care a great deal.

Why are you so off topic?
 
Last edited:
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

The rules are your own pronouncements that you make as if they were commandments 11 on up given to Moses as he came down from the mountain top believing he had spoken to a higher authority.

Give you soapbox a rest or face the consequences. You have no qualification to make such an asinine comment.

here is an example from the previous page

What do you not understand? Was it the free will of the German people to allow government to massacre 20 million people?

Really a simple yes or no will suffice.

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about in your second paragraph about germans and jews.

Of course you don't. It was much to hard to figure out from the example I gave. Let me repeat it to make it obvious to others

What is difficult to understand that the German people for instance did not make an informed decision to murder Jews. Have you any idea why they accepted such inhumanity? I think you have a very good idea since gun control uses the same tactics and techniques.

Is an informed decision not free will and a planted decision the opposite? How difficult was that?
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

I see no LIE that you have ever found in any of my posts.

The fact that you spend so much time with my posts shows conclusively that you care a great deal.

You claimed you knew what I thought and you know that very well as well as the fact it is a lie. See how easy that was.

You are baiting now.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

Give you soapbox a rest or face the consequences. You have no qualification to make such an asinine comment.

As someone who has gone back and forth with you more times than one cares to remember - my qualifications to make such observations are stellar.

And all your germans/jews lines make no sense in the context of this discussion. Why are you so off topic?
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You claimed you knew what I thought and you know that very well as well as the fact it is a lie. See how easy that was.

You are baiting now.

I have no idea what you are referring to. You seem to be inventing things our of your own imagination.

Why are you so off topic?
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

As someone who has gone back and forth with you more times than one cares to remember - my qualifications to make such observations are stellar.

That's the first time I have heard incompetence described as stellar. Coming from you I'm not surprised.

And all your germans/jews lines make no sense in the context of this discussion. Why are you so off topic?

Still on the soapbox trying to score points even after being trashed, smashed, crumbled and buried by facts you cannot deny and then seek to try and trivialise. You Haymarket asked for clarity, you got it. You did not challenge one word of that so conceding the point I made. Thanks for that, I guess this is now closed as you have nothing to offer on the subject and are no pursuing some personal vendetta with this baiting
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

That's the first time I have heard incompetence described as stellar. Coming from you I'm not surprised.

You should really stop the personal insults. They do nothing to advance the topic ....... which you left a country mile in the rear view mirror.

You Haymarket asked for clarity, you got it

Your provided words. No clarity was part of that.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You should really stop the personal insults. They do nothing to advance the topic ....... which you left a country mile in the rear view mirror.

You were not discussing the subject, I was courteous enough to respond to your incoherent babbling.

Your provided words. No clarity was part of that.

You cannot blame your inability to comprehend on me.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You were not discussing the subject, I was courteous enough to respond to your incoherent babbling.



You cannot blame your inability to comprehend on me.

Again with the personal insults. You really should stop this as it fails to advance the topic.

When you FAIL to communicate your idea through your own writing process - it is entirely appropriate to blame your writing for it.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

Again with the personal insults. You really should stop this as it fails to advance the topic.

When you FAIL to communicate your idea through your own writing process - it is entirely appropriate to blame your writing for it.

I simply commented on facts. You were not discussing the subject, I was courteous enough to respond to your incoherent babbling.

You have shown no evidence of that claim. You cannot blame your inability to comprehend on me.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

I simply commented on facts. You were not discussing the subject, I was courteous enough to respond to your incoherent babbling.

You have shown no evidence of that claim. You cannot blame your inability to comprehend on me.

All you are doing is repeating your own personal insults and gave up long ago discussing the topic.

If your writing is such that it fails to make clear some idea that you think you have in your head but does not communicate when posted - that is not the fault of the reader.

As for you - I am still awaiting you to step up to the plate and produce a statement from me that you have proven to be a LIE.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

Moderator's Warning:
The pissing match ends now; this is not the proper venue on this forum for it. Either debate each other without baiting/trolling or you'll find yourselves with further action being taken
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

All you are doing is repeating your own personal insults and gave up long ago discussing the topic.

If your writing is such that it fails to make clear some idea that you think you have in your head but does not communicate when posted - that is not the fault of the reader.

As for you - I am still awaiting you to step up to the plate and produce a statement from me that you have proven to be a LIE.

You are going to have to point to the post in which you asked is the way it is done. I really get tired of schooling you.

Once again a complete lack of evidence of your false claim. It's called grandstanding which you have been doing all along. Lies are not evidence and until you produce the evidence it's lies. You wanted a lie there it is until you produce the evidence it is not. Now go back and count the number of times you have been asked for proof and not provided it. All of those were lies.

It is quite obvious that you have no qualification to make a judgement on comprehension when your lack of comprehension is legendary. You do not even know the difference between infringe and exercise, you cannot comprehend there is no correlation between countries crime rates and guns. You cannot comprehended there is no evidence to support gun control as just some of many examples. As I said no qualification and a lack of comprehension which is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Once again you have been completely refuted.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You are going to have to point to the post in which you asked is the way it is done. I really get tired of schooling you.

Once again a complete lack of evidence of your false claim. It's called grandstanding which you have been doing all along. Lies are not evidence and until you produce the evidence it's lies. You wanted a lie there it is until you produce the evidence it is not. Now go back and count the number of times you have been asked for proof and not provided it. All of those were lies.

It is quite obvious that you have no qualification to make a judgement on comprehension when your lack of comprehension is legendary. You do not even know the difference between infringe and exercise, you cannot comprehend there is no correlation between countries crime rates and guns. You cannot comprehended there is no evidence to support gun control as just some of many examples. As I said no qualification and a lack of comprehension which is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Once again you have been completely refuted.

You clearly do NOT know what a LIE is.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You clearly do NOT know what a LIE is.

Inane and false comment I demonstrated I knew what a lie is. Just about everything you claim is a lie. You just accepted that by not defending your claims and showing they were true, which is impossible for you to do.

Go right ahead and refute my claims let us see how well you do. Until then if the shoe fits wear it.

Clearly you have nothing intelligent to state or add so this is my last response.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

It is quite obvious you do so go right ahead and refute my claims let us see how well you do. Until then if the shoe fits wear it.

You have no shoe to wear as you have made no claim of fact that still stands.

But simply do this: you claim you refuted my argument. Fine. Lets put that to the test.

Simply reproduce my statement right here and tell us in which post you refuted that same statement with verifiable evidence that still stands up after my refutation of it.

Lets see it.

And you still have no idea what an actual LIE is as you misuse it constantly as a defense mechanism to avoid actual debate.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You have no shoe to wear as you have made no claim of fact that still stands.

But simply do this: you claim you refuted my argument. Fine. Lets put that to the test.

Simply reproduce my statement right here and tell us in which post you refuted that same statement with verifiable evidence that still stands up after my refutation of it.

Lets see it.

And you still have no idea what an actual LIE is as you misuse it constantly as a defence mechanism to avoid actual debate.

You are dishonestly moving the goals posts again as you were requested to show where anything you claimed stands. Shifting the burden of proof.

Go back and see them all indicted refuted trashed go count them and show what claim of yours still stands.

92 98 101 104 111 112 115 116 121 122 125 127 128 131 133 135 138

Show where you have refuted these posts that has not been addressed and trashed as completely false.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

You are dishonestly moving the goals posts again as you were requested to show where anything you claimed stands. Shifting the burden of proof.

Go back and see them all indicted refuted trashed go count them and show what claim of yours still stands.

92 98 101 104 111 112 115 116 121 122 125 127 128 131 133 135 138

Show where you have refuted these posts that has not been addressed and trashed as completely false.

So you cannot meet the challenge I presented to you as you presented no claim of fact from me ...... let alone any supposed refutation which came from you.

here it is again: Simply reproduce my statement right here and tell us in which post you refuted that same statement with verifiable evidence that still stands up after my refutation of it.




So you have nothing.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

So you cannot meet the challenge I presented to you.

here it is again: Simply reproduce my statement right here and tell us in which post you refuted that same statement with verifiable evidence that still stands up after my refutation of it.




So you have nothing.

Your challenge was met adequately as each of those posts indicates what is being refuted. Read it slowly that might help. However if you could not be bothered to check that you have once again been trashed, refuted, shown to be false there is no pointing discussing anything with you. As you know a simple denial is insufficient evidence to back anything as valid. Debating with a sore loser is not a challenge I need. It's been a pleasure showing everyone here what you are.
 
Re: Sheriffs' Group Calls on Officers: Refuse to Enforce Gun Control...

Your challenge was met adequately as each of those posts indicates what is being refuted. Read it slowly that might help. However if you could not be bothered to check that you have once again been trashed, refuted, shown to be false there is no pointing discussing anything with you. As you know a simple denial is insufficient evidence to back anything as valid. Debating with a sore loser is not a challenge I need. It's been a pleasure showing everyone here what you are.


So you cannot meet the challenge I presented to you.

here it is again: Simply reproduce my statement right here and tell us in which post you refuted that same statement with verifiable evidence that still stands up after my refutation of it.



You have had several opportunities now and you have failed to meet my challenge.

So you have nothing.
 
Back
Top Bottom