• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Largest study to date finds powerful evidence that gun control actually works

Yall don't need sources............now you want me to do your homework for you!

Look it up yourself..................and also yall with find......the trigger pull will cost on average $10,000 in lawyer's fees .............Bet ya didn't know that either

I have pulled triggers 10's of thousands of times and have never consulted a lawyer at all on it..
 
Yall don't need sources............now you want me to do your homework for you!

Look it up yourself..................and also yall with find......the trigger pull will cost on average $10,000 in lawyer's fees .............Bet ya didn't know that either

More lies. I shot someone, it cost far less than that and I only hired an attorney because I was being careful I was never charged nor arrested.
 
I have pulled triggers 10's of thousands of times and have never consulted a lawyer at all on on it..

You aren't dealing with someone who is telling us anything accurate
 
It's a common abbreviation.

its unbelievable that someone who wants to argue gun control doesn't understand that. Its like wanting to join a football fantasy league and not knowing what NFL or QB or DT or TE refer to
 
its unbelievable that someone who wants to argue gun control doesn't understand that. Its like wanting to join a football fantasy league and not knowing what NFL or QB or DT or TE refer to



There's lots of things I don't know........But I know how to ask and where to look for the answers.............
 
There's lots of things I don't know........But I know how to ask and where to look for the answers.............

suggestion-don't engage in arguments with people who are expert in this area before you are even a somewhat advanced novice
 
suggestion-don't engage in arguments with people who are expert in this area before you are even a somewhat advanced novice

If you're such an expert dude.......how is it you didn't know $hit from Shinola about the gun safety/control studies?

BTW

I never claimed to be a expert on anything..........least about guns.........
 
If you're such an expert dude.......how is it you didn't know $hit from Shinola about the gun safety/control studies?

BTW

I never claimed to be a expert on anything..........least about guns.........

I am an expert. federal judges have found that to be so. so said a former DEM party congressman. those studies have no relevance to the USA.

and stop the crap. You aren't a gun banner because you think it advances public safety
 
I am an expert. federal judges have found that to be so. so said a former DEM party congressman. those studies have no relevance to the USA.

and stop the crap. You aren't a gun banner because you think it advances public safety

You have no idea of what I think, pal. So can it...............

BTW

So happy for you being an expert.............

But how you feel does not change the results of the study...........
 
You have no idea of what I think, pal. So can it...............

Nah, after dealing with members of the Bannite movement for probably longer than yo have been alive, I have seen it all.
 
Nah, after dealing with members of the Bannite movement for probably longer than yo have been alive, I have seen it all.


So you're saying you were born before 1935?


And therefore qualify for membership in the Altakaka Club?
 
So you're saying you were born before 1935?


And therefore qualify for membership in the Altakaka Club?

40+ years of dealing with the Bannite movement. You're claiming to be 81 years old?
 
40+ years of dealing with the Bannite movement. You're claiming to be 81 years old?


Old enough to be your grand dad..............as far as that group you perseverate about..................I don't have a clue.......nor do I care
 
Old enough to be your grand dad..............as far as that group you perseverate about..................I don't have a clue.......nor do I care

My late father was born in 26 so your claim has no validity. The fact is-gun banners almost never are honest about their motivations or goals
 
My late father was born in 26 so your claim has no validity. The fact is-gun banners almost never are honest about their motivations or goals

Really dude........the more you post the sillier you get.................Have you ever tried to be nice to folks and not come off as some type of disagreeable dud? Didn't your mamma teach you anything? Or is it........it just never took.........

BTW

I've engaged in too much of this silly @$$ BS..............so I'm off to Netflix so as to use my time in a more entertaining way...............
 
Really dude........the more you post the sillier you get.................Have you ever tried to be nice to folks and not come off as some type of disagreeable dud? Didn't your mamma teach you anything? Or is it........it just never took.........

why should I be nice to people who want to limit my rights and then lie about why they want to do that?
 
why should I be nice to people who want to limit my rights and then lie about why they want to do that?

Because its the civilized way of being a human being.........and is the Christian way.
 
Because its the civilized way of being a human being.........and is the Christian way.

well I am not a Christian so that is a fail. Secondly, I have nothing but contempt for gun banners and see them as enemies of the constitution. And Twice I took an oath to defend the constitution. and there is nothing civilized about schemes that attempt to disarm good people and leave them defenseless when we have lots of scum bags in this society
 
well I am not a Christian so that is a fail. Secondly, I have nothing but contempt for gun banners and see them as enemies of the constitution. And Twice I took an oath to defend the constitution. and there is nothing civilized about schemes that attempt to disarm good people and leave them defenseless when we have lots of scum bags in this society


I am sorry you feel that way...........
 
Largest study to date finds powerful evidence that gun control actually works - ScienceAlert
Largest study to date finds powerful evidence that gun control actually works

As the US continues to stall on gun control talks, the largest study ever conducted on the topic has found a clear link between firearm regulation and fewer gun-related deaths around the world.
https://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/140.full

Until now, studies on gun laws have been limited to just one city or country, and have failed to reach consistent conclusions. But the new research took a broader view - the team reviewed 130 high-quality studies conducted in 10 countries over the past 60 years. And while they stopped short of saying they've conclusively proved that gun restrictions equal fewer deaths, the research provides pretty powerful evidence to suggest that it's the case……………
A huge international study of gun control finds strong evidence that it actually works - Vox

“……….. After analyzing all of these studies, the researchers came up with three conclusions:
1.It usually takes major legislation overhaul - not just one new law - to see significant change.
2.Restricting access to guns and their purchase is associated with reductions in firearm deaths.
3.Individual studies need to be better executed and planned in future to get more convincing results………..

“…………. But it showed that when countries pass several laws at once that worked together to overhaul the country's firearm code, gun-related deaths tended to decrease.

Santaella-Tenorio told Beauchamp that these overhauls generally included:
•Banning "weapons that are actually very powerful", for example, automatic weapons.
•Implementing background checks.
•"They all required permits and licenses for purchasing guns," Santaella-Tenorio told Vox.
A huge international study of gun control finds strong evidence that it actually works - Vox

For example, in South Africa in 2000, the Firearm Control Act contained all these measures, and saw a 13.6 percent reduction in firearm homicides every single year for the next five years.
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
Guns are responsible for more deaths per year than traffic accidents. But this study proves the number killed looking down the barrel of a gun can be reduced significantly by passing several - common sense - laws at once that worked together to overhaul the country's firearm code, gun-related deaths tended to decrease.
Such an initiative would not violate the 2nd Amendment right of gun ownership and go a long way to bring the “gun community” into better standing with the rest of society ……….
How could anyone be against reducing the number of Americans who die at the hands of a gun?

A just-released study, published in the February issue of Epidemiologic Reviews, seeks to resolve this problem. It systematically reviewed the evidence from around the world on gun laws and gun violence, looking to see if the best studies come to similar conclusions. It is the first such study to look at the international research in this way.

The authors are careful to note that their findings do not conclusively prove that gun restrictions reduce gun deaths. However, they did find a compelling trend whereby new restrictions on gun purchasing and ownership tended to be followed by a decline in gun deaths.

OMG they have discovered the holy grail by cherry picking. How unsurprising it would be if I said we reduce vehicle sales vehicle deaths will decrease.

The mind boggles at the blatant hypocrisy and fraud which even that cannot be proven. What if they had used deaths or crime......
 
A just-released study, published in the February issue of Epidemiologic Reviews, seeks to resolve this problem. It systematically reviewed the evidence from around the world on gun laws and gun violence, looking to see if the best studies come to similar conclusions. It is the first such study to look at the international research in this way.

The authors are careful to note that their findings do not conclusively prove that gun restrictions reduce gun deaths. However, they did find a compelling trend whereby new restrictions on gun purchasing and ownership tended to be followed by a decline in gun deaths.

OMG they have discovered the holy grail by cherry picking. How unsurprising it would be if I said we reduce vehicle sales vehicle deaths will decrease.

The mind boggles at the blatant hypocrisy and fraud which even that cannot be proven. What if they had used deaths or crime......


Do you have a cite for the study you claim.


If so........how do you explain the yearly ever increasing gun related deaths; as the ever increasing gun sales over the same period.............

IN the past 12 years 406,000 have suffered death by gun........... and annually more folks die from gun violence than are killed in traffic accidents......
Death and guns in the USA - CNN.com

There is no justification for these deaths.....and to sit on ones hand saying no0thing can be done to reduce gun violence is irresponsible and insane.........

I am sure you and yours will never admit to the powerless you state to curb the violence.........

And may I suggest the reason so is the result of self serving selfishness .......and the total lack of empathy for your fellow man......
 
Back
Top Bottom