• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Your stance on banning guns, and confiscation.[W:740]

Re: Your stance on banning guns, and confiscation.

jet57 said:
Can you please point out the strawman? It'll help to understand where you're coming from.
Click to expand...

It is self evident. Strawman inserted to knock down. Not what was claimed at all, that was not even addressed. Typical of gun control advocates.

Does that satisfy you? Will you now answer with the same depth of explanation?

Haymarket This is obviously your polite way of saying ... "gosh Haymarket you are not playing along like you are suppose to. Stop it. I want you to pick a number - any number and I really don't give a crap what the number is because that is where the GOTCHA comes in. You see if you say 100 guns, I will then ask you what magically happens to make 101 so bad and evil that 101 cannot be owned but 100 guns can. See how that works? This foolproof tactic was developed by the NRA summer seminar "how to debate our opponents in ten easy steps" and is guaranteed to work each and every time. At least Wayne La Pierre said it would. But you are not playing along and reading your lines as they were written."
Click to expand...

Just to answer as I already have there is no number that can be satisfied for gun control it is ALL and can only be all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom