• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Media registry gag exposes bias against 2nd Amendment

Is uncontrolled power good or bad?

Uncontrolled by what? Any power must be controlled necessarily by the will of the person wielding it. So when you say uncontrolled you must be referring to a (unmentioned) subject. So the answer is that it depends on what the power is "uncontrolled" with respect to.

Not so it only works if and only if the press are forced by sales to be balanced

What do you mean balanced? Do you mean they must avoid falling over? You need to specify what "balanced" means.

Citizens are going to get as much as they allow. Same as they get the government they deserve.

Why must everything devolve to the nanny state where citizens are treated like helpless children. That is the quickest way to destroy society. Allow citizens to abdicate their duties and responsibilities.

The duties of the average individual concern his particular state in life. Only those wielding great power over society as a whole have a duty to it. It is not in any way contrary to subsidiarity (quite the contrary, it is a promotion of it) for private individuals to be denied power over the nation as a whole.
 
Uncontrolled by what? Any power must be controlled necessarily by the will of the person wielding it. So when you say uncontrolled you must be referring to a (unmentioned) subject. So the answer is that it depends on what the power is "uncontrolled" with respect to..

No accountability and no responsibility.


What do you mean balanced? Do you mean they must avoid falling over? You need to specify what "balanced" means.

I'm not playing silly word games with you. Exactly how does the press fall over. Sheezzz...

The duties of the average individual concern his particular state in life. Only those wielding great power over society as a whole have a duty to it. It is not in any way contrary to subsidiarity (quite the contrary, it is a promotion of it) for private individuals to be denied power over the nation as a whole

Once again you are trying to mess about. The government governs with the CONSENT of the governed. ie government is citizens employee. As of when does the employer just let the employee do their own thing anyway they want? The right to remove any government is held by the people.

And that is all there is to it as far as I am concerned.
 
No accountability and no responsibility.

It's literally not possible for a person with power to lack responsibility. Power inherently carries responsibility. And accountability to whom? Everyone is accountable to God, so again you need to clarify the referent.


I'm not playing silly word games with you. Exactly how does the press fall over. Sheezzz...

If you don't want to play silly word games then don't use silly buzzwords like "balance".

Once again you are trying to mess about. The government governs with the CONSENT of the governed. ie government is citizens employee.

Which is manifestly absurd. Try giving orders to a policeman.

As of when does the employer just let the employee do their own thing anyway they want? The right to remove any government is held by the people.

Who speaks for the people?

And that is all there is to it as far as I am concerned.

What you or anyone else believes is logically irrelevant to what is true.
 
Back
Top Bottom