• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Truth About Gun Control

US Conservative

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
33,522
Reaction score
10,826
Location
Between Athens and Jerusalem
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative


Documentation available at youtube link.

Hmm, any guesses on if anti's will attack the messenger?

How many will simply ignore the data presented?

Facts, are stubborn things.
 
does it blame communists?
 
"The Truth..." is never a good title.
 
Why don't you review the data and see? Hundreds of millions of people killed by commies would like to know.

does it blame communists? i mean for all i know your blaming the illuminati
 
oh! this from is from Stefan Molyneux the cult leader who tells children run away from home...... yeah I'm not watching one his brainwashing videos thanks

Already controversial for counselling his followers to shun their parents, a Toronto-area podcaster is facing allegations he listened in on his therapist wife as she met with distraught patients.

Stefan Molyneux is a self-described libertarian philosopher. His wife, Christina Papadopoulos, is a psychological associate in Mississauga.

The College of Psychologists of Ontario found Ms. Papadopoulos guilty of professional misconduct in November, 2012, faulting her for adopting Mr. Molyneux’s views and using the Internet to counsel people to sever ties with their families.

Controversial podcaster listened in on therapist wife and clients: lawsuit - The Globe and Mail
 
Simply prove it wrong, then. Test your theory.

Sorry, I don't watch youtube videos serving as someone's argument. Especially not when they're titled "The Truth".

For what it's worth I'm against: background checks beyond retail sale, registration, CC denial and the removal of the right to self defense for most felons. I support teachers with CC. I'm against "gun free zones". I support all arms of the infantry being protected by the 2nd.
 
Im particularly interested in the negative correlation between crime and poverty. Fascinating stuff. Going to research it myself.

I'm listening to that part right now, and he just discussed Appalachia, which I am at the Foothills of the Appalachian Mountains.

Also, the inverse relation to value of the crime versus the use of a firearm - the lower the value of the stolen property, the more likely there was a gun used. Crazy.
 
oh! this from is from Stefan Molyneux the cult leader who tells children run away from home...... yeah I'm not watching one his brainwashing videos thanks



Controversial podcaster listened in on therapist wife and clients: lawsuit - The Globe and Mail

Attacking the messenger. Took less than a half hour. Totally called it. :lol:

Tell you what, how about you dismiss his data, then. Should be easy, right?

Suicide
CDC - Page Not Found
https://en.wikipedia...tion_.282012.29
http://abcnews.go.co...-in-south-korea
http://webappa.cdc.g...dcaus10_us.html
http://www.ons.gov.u...n=tcm:77-327590

Gun Sources
http://www.bjs.gov/c.../pdf/fv9311.pdf

Australian Gun Control
http://www.aic.gov.a...r01.pdf#page=35
http://www.aic.gov.a...appendix_a.html
http://data.worldban...tor/SP.POP.TOTL
http://www.loc.gov/l...ia.php#Firearms

Number of Guns
http://engagedschola...xt=urban_facpub
http://www.ucrdatatool.gov
https://www.fbi.gov/.../tables/table-1

2002 State Gun Ownership and Crime
https://www.fbi.gov/...c2.pdf#page=207
https://www.census.g...2002/state.html
https://www.fbi.gov/...le5_state02.xls
http://pediatrics.aa...0.full.pdf html

Washington, DC Crime
http://www.disasterc...ime/dccrime.htm
http://www.nytimes.c...iams, Anthony A.
https://en.wikipedia...ons_Act_of_1975

CDC Gun Control Report
http://www.cdc.gov/m...f/rr/rr5214.pdf

Crime by Race
https://www.fbi.gov/...n-the-u.s.-2014
http://www.census.go...-04.pdf#page=15

Because of the obscure way in which the FBI reports the race and ethnicity of offenders, we had to make several approximations. First off, Hispanic data is separated from race data and is broken down to "Hispanic" or "not Hispanic" for the entire dataset. While it is safe to assume that most Hispanics were classified as white because of the colour of their skin, we didn't want to make any assumptions. To figure out the percentage of Hispanic offenders and separate it from the white, black, asian etc. race categories, we used Census data on how Hispanics identify themselves racially. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of them identify as white, and very few consider themselves black. Given the very low percentage of black Hispanics, we counted "Some Other Race" as white. Another problem with the FBI dataset was the vast number of "Unknown" reported offenders. Because we couldn't make any reasonable assumptions about the race of the unknown offenders, we used the arrest tables as a proxy for the distribution of crime by race.

International Crime Comparison
https://en.wikipedia...l_homicide_rate

Gang Crime
https://www.fbi.gov/...reat-assessment
https://www.national...is/demographics
http://www.bjs.gov/i...detail&iid=2221

2014 City Crime Data
City data from the U.S. Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov
City Crime data from the FBI: https://www.fbi.gov/.../tables/table-6
 
I'm listening to that part right now, and he just discussed Appalachia, which I am at the Foothills of the Appalachian Mountains.

Also, the inverse relation to value of the crime versus the use of a firearm - the lower the value of the stolen property, the more likely there was a gun used. Crazy.

Absolutely. Uncomfortable data for the left.
 
Attacking the messenger. Took less than a half hour. Totally called it. :lol:

Tell you what, how about you dismiss his data, then. Should be easy, right?

Suicide
CDC - Page Not Found
https://en.wikipedia...tion_.282012.29
http://abcnews.go.co...-in-south-korea
http://webappa.cdc.g...dcaus10_us.html
http://www.ons.gov.u...n=tcm:77-327590

Gun Sources
http://www.bjs.gov/c.../pdf/fv9311.pdf

Australian Gun Control
http://www.aic.gov.a...r01.pdf#page=35
http://www.aic.gov.a...appendix_a.html
http://data.worldban...tor/SP.POP.TOTL
http://www.loc.gov/l...ia.php#Firearms

Number of Guns
http://engagedschola...xt=urban_facpub
http://www.ucrdatatool.gov
https://www.fbi.gov/.../tables/table-1

2002 State Gun Ownership and Crime
https://www.fbi.gov/...c2.pdf#page=207
https://www.census.g...2002/state.html
https://www.fbi.gov/...le5_state02.xls
http://pediatrics.aa...0.full.pdf html

Washington, DC Crime
http://www.disasterc...ime/dccrime.htm
http://www.nytimes.c...iams, Anthony A.
https://en.wikipedia...ons_Act_of_1975

CDC Gun Control Report
http://www.cdc.gov/m...f/rr/rr5214.pdf

Crime by Race
https://www.fbi.gov/...n-the-u.s.-2014
http://www.census.go...-04.pdf#page=15

Because of the obscure way in which the FBI reports the race and ethnicity of offenders, we had to make several approximations. First off, Hispanic data is separated from race data and is broken down to "Hispanic" or "not Hispanic" for the entire dataset. While it is safe to assume that most Hispanics were classified as white because of the colour of their skin, we didn't want to make any assumptions. To figure out the percentage of Hispanic offenders and separate it from the white, black, asian etc. race categories, we used Census data on how Hispanics identify themselves racially. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of them identify as white, and very few consider themselves black. Given the very low percentage of black Hispanics, we counted "Some Other Race" as white. Another problem with the FBI dataset was the vast number of "Unknown" reported offenders. Because we couldn't make any reasonable assumptions about the race of the unknown offenders, we used the arrest tables as a proxy for the distribution of crime by race.

International Crime Comparison
https://en.wikipedia...l_homicide_rate

Gang Crime
https://www.fbi.gov/...reat-assessment
https://www.national...is/demographics
http://www.bjs.gov/i...detail&iid=2221

2014 City Crime Data
City data from the U.S. Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov
City Crime data from the FBI: https://www.fbi.gov/.../tables/table-6

the fact that no argument has been made and your already posting dozens of random links which im guessing you have saved on your computer, tells me you might need too stop watching illuminati/freemason/jewish conspiracy videos.
 
Sorry, I don't watch youtube videos serving as someone's argument. Especially not when they're titled "The Truth".

For what it's worth I'm against: background checks beyond retail sale, registration, CC denial and the removal of the right to self defense for most felons. I support teachers with CC. I'm against "gun free zones". I support all arms of the infantry being protected by the 2nd.

Well then, its a good thing you entered the thread to say you aren't going to view the op, and its data.

Well played.
 
the fact that no argument has been made and your already posting dozens of random links which im guessing you have saved on your computer, tells me you might need too stop watching illuminati/freemason/jewish conspiracy videos.

He's made the argument, Ive merely provided his citations.

All you need to do is disprove it if you disagree.

However, I suspect you can not, hence the attempt to attack the messenger.

Smear the person making the claims, and you wont ever need to discuss the data, right? :2wave:
 
Well then, its a good thing you entered the thread to say you aren't going to view the op, and its data.

Well played.

Let us know when you can make your own argument instead of spamming a youtube video, which, from what I gather above, is made by a whackjob.

As an advocate of the 2nd, I say: you're not helping.
 
He's made the argument, Ive merely provided his citations.

All you need to do is disprove it if you disagree.

However, I suspect you can not, hence the attempt to attack the messenger.

Smear the person making the claims, and you wont ever need to discuss the data, right? :2wave:

Sounds like a Truther. Funny how the title now fits.
 
Let us know when you can make your own argument instead of spamming a youtube video, which, from what I gather above, is made by a whackjob.

As an advocate of the 2nd, I say: you're not helping.

well he's a cult leader so either he's too embarrassed to say what the conclusion of the video is unless you listen to an hour worth of nonsense first. Or much more likely, there is no point just a general feeling of hatred and random suspicion and he wants to share this hatred with the world

here is funny explanation of Stefan Molyneux's brainwashing videos along with some ex-cult members describing how this guy has ruined hundreds of peoples lives.





 
well he's a cult leader so either he's too embarrassed to say what the conclusion of the video is unless you listen to an hour worth of nonsense first. Or much more likely there is no point just general feeling of hatred and random suspicion and he wants to share this hatred with the world

here is funny explanation of Stefan Molyneux's brainwashing videos along with some ex-cult memebers describing how this guy has ruined hundreds of peoples lives.

So, basically, it actually is Truthing. How funny.
 
well he's a cult leader so either he's too embarrassed to say what the conclusion of the video is unless you listen to an hour worth of nonsense first. Or much more likely, there is no point just a general feeling of hatred and random suspicion and he wants to share this hatred with the world

here is funny explanation of Stefan Molyneux's brainwashing videos along with some ex-cult members describing how this guy has ruined hundreds of peoples lives.

Classic smear tactics. As pathetic as they are predictable.
 
Back
Top Bottom