• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man ambushes Firefighters responding to a fire.

Death by "Gun Control"

Not to diminish any one life, Gun Control, specifically bans on possession as you have suggested, have lead to genocide. With a heavy heart, I will gladly embrace 297 deaths over possibly tens of millions.

Tens of millions?? Im fairly certain the largest killer of humans in history other than natural death is by guns.
 
Tens of millions?? Im fairly certain the largest killer of humans in history other than natural death is by guns.

actually arrows killed far more due to thousands of years arrows have been around

but the single biggest killer by violent death of humans is GOVERNMENT
 
Tens of millions?? Im fairly certain the largest killer of humans in history other than natural death is by guns.

Dude...you're kidding right? Bacterial/viral infection is KNOWN to be the largest killer of humans in history, FAR greater than all other means combined.
 
Dude...you're kidding right? Bacterial/viral infection is KNOWN to be the largest killer of humans in history, FAR greater than all other means combined.

I think disease falls into the category of "natural causes."
 
Tens of millions?? Im fairly certain the largest killer of humans in history other than natural death is by guns.
More minorities have been gassed by governments than have been shot. Then there is forced starvation, labor camps, intentional exposure to infectious diseases, poisoning, etc. It's not that hard to kill unarmed people when you have an army.
 
More minorities have been gassed by governments than have been shot. Then there is forced starvation, labor camps, intentional exposure to infectious diseases, poisoning, etc. It's not that hard to kill unarmed people when you have an army.

The countries those people were from had armies that were suppose to protect them, that did not work to well, did it?
 
The countries those people were from had armies that were suppose to protect them, that did not work to well, did it?

Yet that's where you put your trust.

BTW, who's going to be conducting the forcible searches of every single home in America that you have in mind?
 
The countries those people were from had armies that were suppose to protect them, that did not work to well, did it?
Yeah, not exactly. Those armies were formed to protect the people DOING that to them.
 
Yeah, not exactly. Those armies were formed to protect the people DOING that to them.

You notice he's clammed up about the implications of what he says.
 
You notice he's clammed up about the implications of what he says.
Funny how that happens when a little perspective is lent against the talking points.
 
Back
Top Bottom