• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This Is Not The Time For Stimulus Spending[W:279]

Re: This Is Not The Time For Stimulus Spending

any time is a good time for the stimulus of solving simple poverty of circulating money, in any capital economy.
 
Re: This Is Not The Time For Stimulus Spending

Do you have a quote that you could offer here? Because the rest of the universe seems to understand that no criminal charges were warranted, that was the verdict of the FBI, and apparently the attorney general. Or is this your personal legal judgement?


He said that criminal charges were not warranted because he felt she did not Intentionally break the law, even though it was determined that she did break the law. Where have you been?
 
Re: This Is Not The Time For Stimulus Spending

He said that criminal charges were not warranted because he felt she did not Intentionally break the law, even though it was determined that she did break the law. Where have you been?

"It was determined"....by who? Yourself? Fox News? Billy Bub down in Mississippi? Comey's "verdict" (which he was not entitled to deliver, but anyway) was that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue the case. If there was a good case against her, one could bet that it would be pursued, especially in light of Comey's later actions. Clinton was "careless", but that was it. Being careless in N Korea could, I bet, be fatal under certain circumstances, but in America it is not a crime. Where is the quote from Comey saying Clinton broke the law?

And what were in those classified emails that went out over a private server? Do you know? If a different operator reviewed them again, or the same one later on, would they have received the same level of classification? Was this a big deal, or a small deal? Was it about the identities of CIA operatives in Russia, or was it an upcoming port visit by a US ship?

You don't know, but you are going by fringe and inflammatory websites, I suspect, in looking for confirmation of already held political beliefs.
 
Back
Top Bottom