• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hoarding Money Cures Diseases

...

3: It's almost impossible to have a private practice for family doctors anymore (unless you are working for the rich and famous). You have to be part of a network for referrals today. 30 years it wasn't that big of a deal as 40% of all practices were privately owned. You (if your a Doctor) are dealing Admin hassle of today.. it's not like 30 years ago when I was a kid and my family doctor had 2 employees (Nurse and a Receptionist). Today, you need an army to deal with Insurance, Federal Government insurance, Drug reps, Medical reps and so forth.

About 15 year ago, our local newspaper published the financials for our state chartered non profit county hospital. Turned out that the hospital had enough cash on hand to give free care to every patient for something like two or three years. Right after that, the hospital started buying up privately owned doctors office. I can only assume that they did this to get rid of the "excess" money they had.

Now almost every doctors office in our county is owned by one or the other hospital system that we have (the other hospital system is privately owned). And in most cases, these were offices that were going to be closed, it's not like the doctors were retiring, they just got an inflated price for their practice, then they continued working at those practices as an employee, making just as much as they would have if they hadn't had sold their practices.

Our county hospital system no longer discloses financials. they claim that since they aren't actually funded by any government, they don't have to disclose financials.
 
It hasn't been a failure in Belgium. We have one of the best health care systems in Europe.

Belgium

Belgium's healthcare system is rated by Expatica.com, a UK expatriates web site, as having one of the best healthcare systems in Europe. Dating from 1945, its quality is largely down to its sponsorship by competing mutuals, and provisioned by a mixture of state and non-profit hospitals. Each mutual is funded by the state, the funding dependent on its membership numbers.

Like the system in France, citizens pay and swipe a health card at the point of care. They are then reimbursed between 50% and 75% of the costs by their mutuelle/mutualiteit scheme. Some GPs and hospitals have local arrangements with mutuals to reduce payments at the point of care.

Also as in France, most citizens also sign up for mutual insurance to top up their healthcare reimbursements (complimentaire).

As in Germany, Belgian citizens can visit any healthcare establishment they wish - quite literally walking in off the street, although referrals from private or practice-linked GPs are increasingly being used, and language pays a major part in choices.
https://www.theguardian.com/healthc...thcare-services-belgium-france-germany-sweden

It sounds like you have a system where the citizens choose a healthcare insurance plan and pay for it themselves.
 
Projecting much MR? You may need to actually try to cognate the strings of words presented, since your usual, propaganda and rhetoric, won't cover it.



And, Mr. Trump would have had my unqualified vote, if he had simply financed his own cruiser and merely "taken care of business" in the Middle East.

What? You are getting more incoherent with every post. You are speaking English, right?
 
I believe that the RUC has had the largest influence on the "caps" for training slots, the supposed fear of an oversupply of doctors was a script pushed by the AMA dominated RUC, and again, primary care reimbursement (well, all reimbursements) are effectively set by the RUC also. I don't have the time to dig up the docs, but will soon.

Yes, RUC was set in stone by 1997 Budget agreement. AMA has shifted it's position in recent years since mid 2000s.
 
About 15 year ago, our local newspaper published the financials for our state chartered non profit county hospital. Turned out that the hospital had enough cash on hand to give free care to every patient for something like two or three years. Right after that, the hospital started buying up privately owned doctors office. I can only assume that they did this to get rid of the "excess" money they had.

Now almost every doctors office in our county is owned by one or the other hospital system that we have (the other hospital system is privately owned). And in most cases, these were offices that were going to be closed, it's not like the doctors were retiring, they just got an inflated price for their practice, then they continued working at those practices as an employee, making just as much as they would have if they hadn't had sold their practices.

Our county hospital system no longer discloses financials. they claim that since they aren't actually funded by any government, they don't have to disclose financials.

Well if it's a county hospital, it's publicly funded. But since I don't know the hospital or anything else.. I can't really comment on it. Every single Hospital in my area (being a city) is non-profit and or University/Research tied and about every 3-5 years there is major investment done..
 
Yes, RUC was set in stone by 1997 Budget agreement. AMA has shifted it's position in recent years since mid 2000s.
Oh, by all means, elaborate.


And just in case there is any confusion:

verb
əˈlabəˌrāt/
1.
develop or present (a theory, policy, or system) in detail.

I wouldn't want this to happen again:

You'll have to explain more if I misunderstand what you are asking..
 
Oh, by all means, elaborate.


And just in case there is any confusion:

verb
əˈlabəˌrāt/
1.
develop or present (a theory, policy, or system) in detail.

I wouldn't want this to happen again:

Smart ass.. I wasn't understanding what you were generally stating as you never formed a question but rather statements as you never ended your sentences with ?.

Well since 2002 the American Association of Medical Colleges tried to expand it's resident slots by 30% in 2015 and do so by private measures but they got pressure from Medicare/Medicaid who wanted full accounting of the Hospitals residency programs (another layer of crap).

AMA is a dying association and tossed their support with ACA hoping they'd get massive expansion of the Residency program because they need members. Like all "Unions" you need to replace dying members.
 
..... but most people know jack **** about that stuff and your still gonna pay $200 as the Doctor is still gonna order a full CBC when you visit.

That's part of the problem with libertarian style economies. To work right, it requires that we have perfect information and that we understand that information perfectly.
 
Smart ass.. I wasn't understanding what you were generally stating as you never formed a question but rather statements as you never ended your sentences with ?.
Oh, it was punctuation that confused....so sorry....i feels bad.

Well since 2002 the American Association of Medical Colleges tried to expand it's resident slots by 30% in 2015 and do so by private measures but they got pressure from Medicare/Medicaid who wanted full accounting of the Hospitals residency programs (another layer of crap).
OK, second time, ELABORATE, show me something where "M/M" stopped the expansion of funding for training. That is not a question, it is a request....just so you don't get confused.

The point was, RUC, controlled by the AMA, has not pushed for higher levels of FEDERAL funding for training, they want to keep the levels of Dr. down to cause higher incomes. If you are arguing that the AMA has reversed this policy, show it.
 
Well if it's a county hospital, it's publicly funded. But since I don't know the hospital or anything else.. I can't really comment on it. Every single Hospital in my area (being a city) is non-profit and or University/Research tied and about every 3-5 years there is major investment done..

Apparently it receives no direct government funding, or at least that is what they claimed. Technically it is a state chartered hospital, but the name of my county is part of the name of the hospital, I dunno if that makes it a county hospital or not. I suppose that with tens of millions of dollars of profit each year, they don't have the need for government funding.
 
OK, second time, ELABORATE, show me something where "M/M" stopped the expansion of funding for training. That is not a question, it is a request....just so you don't get confused.

From the AAMC. San Diego Union-Tribune . How about Forbes?



The point was, RUC, controlled by the AMA, has not pushed for higher levels of FEDERAL funding for training, they want to keep the levels of Dr. down to cause higher incomes. If you are arguing that the AMA has reversed this policy, show it.

RUC while controlled by AMA can only give recommendations to CMS. We have no clue what AMA said to CMS or if it argued for more Federal Funding or not. AMA fought for Teaching Health Center Program as part of ACA. AMA wasn't satisfied with it.. and is now lobbying big time for expansion of the program.
 
That's part of the problem with libertarian style economies. To work right, it requires that we have perfect information and that we understand that information perfectly.

It's not just libertarian economics, it's all economics. We never have complete picture of information.
 
Apparently it receives no direct government funding, or at least that is what they claimed. Technically it is a state chartered hospital, but the name of my county is part of the name of the hospital, I dunno if that makes it a county hospital or not. I suppose that with tens of millions of dollars of profit each year, they don't have the need for government funding.

They are lying out their ass.. if they are County hospital, it has to receive public funding because you legally can't turn a patient away and they are gonna seek the most money they can..
 
Hoarding money by the one percent could achieve some objectives; but, if Capitalism was that easy, we would not need a Congress.
 
our state chartered non profit county hospital. … they claim that since they aren't actually funded by any government

if it's a county hospital, it's publicly funded. … I don't know the hospital or anything else.. I can't really comment on it.

Except to say that "They are lying out their ass" and that they do receive public funding.

What's "public funding" in this context? Accepting Medicare and Medicaid payments? If you accept those dollars and have an ER, yer bound by EMTALA and you get some money for that.

This should be easy to settle. What's the name of the hospital? I called Laurens County Memorial Hospital and was told that because of EMTALA they do get federal money to help pay for hiring and training of healthcare workers.
 
Except to say that "They are lying out their ass" and that they do receive public funding.

What's "public funding" in this context? Accepting Medicare and Medicaid payments? If you accept those dollars and have an ER, yer bound by EMTALA and you get some money for that.

This should be easy to settle. What's the name of the hospital? I called Laurens County Memorial Hospital and was told that because of EMTALA they do get federal money to help pay for hiring and training of healthcare workers.

Yes, accepting Medicare and Medicaid payments (or SCHIP)..
 
They are lying out their ass.. if they are County hospital, it has to receive public funding because you legally can't turn a patient away and they are gonna seek the most money they can..

they have ample money.

I had a friend who had insurance and $35,000 worth of charges that the insurance co wouldn't cover (out of a $400,000+ bill) after his double bypass. They asked him if he could pay it, he told them no, so they reduced the bill to just what the insurance company paid. And my mother in law spent six months there before she passed away last summer. $1.5 million dollar bill, the hospital accepted whatever medicare paid.

Six months ago when my orthopedic doctor setup my arm surgery at this same hospital, I went to pre-surgery dept two days before the surgery, checked in with the check in lady who sent me to the money lady who told me that it was $36,000 and that I had to pay 50% up front. I told her "hell know it isn't because I'm not paying anything like that...I will chew off my arm before I do that." She then told me that since I didn't have insurance they would reduce the cost to $24,000, and once again I told her that they weren't going to do that because I wasn't going to get the surgery done there.

I walked out, drove a half mile down the same street, walked into the Ambulatory Surgery Center, asked them how much, they told me $5k, so I told them to call my doct and schedule me asap. I drove back to my orthopedic doctors office, asked him if to change my surgery location. The ironic thing is that my orthopedic doctors office is owned by the same hospital system, and so is the Ambulatory Surgery Center.

My doc later told me that he prefered to do it at the Ambulatory Surgery Center, but that he only scheduled it for the hospital because he knew that they would take payments. I said "doc, half of $24k is $12k, so by going to the Ambulatory Surgery Center, I've immediately saved $7k in out of pocket expenses, plus I don't have to make payments." He just said "I see your point". I don't think he realized that they were going to demand 50% up front.

No one actually needs to cover bills that go unpaid, they just use accounting entries to deal with the issue. Hospital bills are jacked up to begin with, and are often almost random.

My wife was once charged hundreds of dollars for "bedpan rental" on a single night stay - she never used a bedpan and to the best of our knowledge, there was not one in the room. I objected to the charge, they said "ok, we will just take that off". I took my son for an xray when he fell out of a tree, after waiting four hours, they came in and told me that the xray was defective and that he would have to take another one. We walked out. Ended up getting a $800 bill, I sent the bill back with a letter explaining that they rendered no service of value to us. Never heard anything about that bill again, not from a bill collector, not on my credit report, I suppose they just disappeared it.

Sometimes I have customers to stiff me, I just eat the loss, unless it's an excessive amount of money, at which time I usually threaten to kill them and I get paid pretty rapidly after that (I'm kidding of course...or am I?). The hospital is no different, except that they have such huge profits that they can afford to eat the lost much easier that I can.

By the way, hospitals absolutely can turn people away. All they have to do is to insure that the condition is stablized. There was no requirement that any hospital reattach my tricep muscle to the bone - it wasn't life or death, it was just whether or not I would ever have use of that arm again. In my case, I never even went to the emergency room - torn muscles and broken bones (except for compound fractures) aren't considered emergencies. Heart attacks and open wounds are. If hospitals had to treat everyone for everything, then why would anyone ever need insurance?
 
Last edited:
Except to say that "They are lying out their ass" and that they do receive public funding.

What's "public funding" in this context? Accepting Medicare and Medicaid payments? If you accept those dollars and have an ER, yer bound by EMTALA and you get some money for that.

This should be easy to settle. What's the name of the hospital? I called Laurens County Memorial Hospital and was told that because of EMTALA they do get federal money to help pay for hiring and training of healthcare workers.

Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System is our state chartered hospital https://www.spartanburgregional.com/

The private hospital in our county is Home | Mary Black Spartanburg
 
Last edited:
Except to say that "They are lying out their ass" and that they do receive public funding.

What's "public funding" in this context? Accepting Medicare and Medicaid payments? If you accept those dollars and have an ER, yer bound by EMTALA and you get some money for that.

This should be easy to settle. What's the name of the hospital? I called Laurens County Memorial Hospital and was told that because of EMTALA they do get federal money to help pay for hiring and training of healthcare workers.

I suspect their argument is that they are self supporting (much like the post office is or the federal reserve is) and don't use taxpayer money beyond what any healthcare facility that accepts insurance would use (medicare and medicade are insurance, even if government provided).
 
Last edited:
they have ample money.

I had a friend who had insurance and $35,000 worth of charges that the insurance co wouldn't cover after his double bypass. They asked him if he could pay it, he told them no, so they reduced the bill to just what the insurance company paid. And my mother in law spent six months there before she passed away last summer. $1.5 million dollar bill, the hospital accepted what medicare paid.

So they accept Federal money. ;)
 
hospitals absolutely can turn people away … All they have to do is to insure that the condition is stablized.

I'd say the idea is that people need to be treated until/unless they are stabilised.
 
I'd say the idea is that people need to be treated until/unless they are stabilised.

I think they define "stabilized" as not likely to immediately die because of the condition. Most ER patients are stable before they enter the ER.
 
Back
Top Bottom