• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards[W:157]

Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Gimmesometruth said:
If you hadn't noticed, this is a thread about how the budget is viewed ,discretionary versus mandatory spending.

It isn't about "illegals" or ISIS....or any other bit of red meat bs right wingers like to go on and on about. YOU should know better, get back on topic.
Click to expand...

Maybe you didn't notice but Jbander's arguments wander around like a drunken cow with a jetpack; its all over the place.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

OpportunityCost said:
Here is the real deal
Click to expand...

Umm...

It was painfully obvious that his chart addressed discretionary spending.

Your "gotcha" failed.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

OpportunityCost said:
Maybe you didn't notice but Jbander's arguments wander around like a drunken cow with a jetpack; its all over the place.
Click to expand...
Yer being a hypocrite, if you can't control yerself, you have no business pointing.

Cut the crap.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Gimmesometruth said:
If you hadn't noticed, this is a thread about how the budget is viewed ,discretionary versus mandatory spending.

It isn't about "illegals" or ISIS....or any other bit of red meat bs right wingers like to go on and on about. YOU should know better, get back on topic.
Click to expand...

You are right. I am sorry for derailing the thread. I will stop.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Mr Person said:
Umm...

It was painfully obvious that his chart addressed discretionary spending.

Your "gotcha" failed.
Click to expand...

Its painfully obvious the chart was skewed to make a political point by not addressing all spending. You noticed Politifact rates it as false?
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Gimmesometruth said:
Yer being a hypocrite, if you can't control yerself, you have no business pointing.

Cut the crap.
Click to expand...

Speaking of no control.

Hypocrite.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Moderator's Warning:
I want to state that I am sorry that I contributed to the derailing of this thread. This will now stop. To all parties involved. (including myself) Stick to the topic or infractions will be handed out. (in my case I'll have one of the admins infract me if I break this warning)
Kal'Stang said:
You are right. I am sorry for derailing the thread. I will stop.
Click to expand...
 
Mr Person said:
Umm...

It was painfully obvious that his chart addressed discretionary spending.

Your "gotcha" failed.
Click to expand...

You mean this chart?

jbander said:
View attachment 67199688 With the regressives comes endless stupidity. They will destroy this country and it's values if they get their way. They have progressed from just being the other party to the party that will destroy everything of value that we have. The endless hate which is blatantly shown by who is left as their presidential candidates, who are the leaders of their party , it's one sick group of people.
Click to expand...

This chart? The one referred to as a chart of "federal spending"? That chart? The only thing obvious in that chart is the color blue. No reference at all to the word or idea of "discretionary".
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
Of course she hasn't been charged because she hasn't done anything illegal or wrong. 6 committees why 6 committee investigating the same charges when all previous committee found nothing wrong. I do have to wonder how can anyone be so easily controled that they can see these committees as anything other then trying to hurt a presidential candidate from the apposing party that is a automatic winner unless they can lie her out of office. Your party is a very sick party , dangerous , against the best interest of the country and the only real threat to destroying this country and it's values. It has to go, it will disappear by itself because of demographics but I don't want to wait, they are to dangerous to my country.
Click to expand...
Well, I have to give the Clinton's some credit. They leave the White House "broke" then somehow start a foundation which normally means you donate a ton of money to do good. But their foundation is extremely profitable. Don't understand why the sleaze factor alone doesn't repel all potential supporters.
And I know that you are sick about hearing about Benghazi but there is a strong disconnect between her "3 AM Phone Call" expertise and what she did at 3 AM.
Hard to believe that Nixon was impeached due to a second rate burglary that he had no prior knowledge compare to what Hillary does today.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
That's funny the countries that are most pointed out by the regressives for being socialist.
Click to expand...
That is funny. There is so much conservatism in Scandinavian countries like no minimum wages, high regressive taxes like 25%VAT, tight culture with strong language and border security, willingness to stand up for the freedom of speech such as the Muhammed cartoon, yet so many conservatives hate them and so many fascist progressives like them.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Eric7216 said:
Well, I have to give the Clinton's some credit. They leave the White House "broke" then somehow start a foundation which normally means you donate a ton of money to do good. But their foundation is extremely profitable. Don't understand why the sleaze factor alone doesn't repel all potential supporters.
And I know that you are sick about hearing about Benghazi but there is a strong disconnect between her "3 AM Phone Call" expertise and what she did at 3 AM.
Hard to believe that Nixon was impeached due to a second rate burglary that he had no prior knowledge compare to what Hillary does today.
Click to expand...

Watergate dominated every news cycle. History may regard it as a second-rate burglary, but at the time, it was shocking.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
Ok with the hatred of of Muslims, the poor, the 47%, teachers, government, government workers , Mexicans, Gays, regulations, black presidents. Government that would operate with that as their premise would destroy our country, terrorist don't have that capability do they.
Click to expand...

Conservatives don't hate any of those people. So your argument is garbage.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Kal'Stang said:
Of course there is limited support of refugees from Syria and like countries. I don't see anyone hollering about Cuban refugee's though do you? Perhaps the issue isn't near as black and white as you're presenting?
Click to expand...
It only becomes black and white when your party stepped over a line that is a threat to this country and just so evil that there is no longer any grey areas anymore. It is black and white totally
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

OpportunityCost said:
Maybe you didn't notice but Jbander's arguments wander around like a drunken cow with a jetpack; its all over the place.
Click to expand...
Of course its all over the place , you open so many ways to take it, with you not having a clue what the facts are. other than insults you don't contribute anyway.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

Eric7216 said:
Well, I have to give the Clinton's some credit. They leave the White House "broke" then somehow start a foundation which normally means you donate a ton of money to do good. But their foundation is extremely profitable. Don't understand why the sleaze factor alone doesn't repel all potential supporters.
And I know that you are sick about hearing about Benghazi but there is a strong disconnect between her "3 AM Phone Call" expertise and what she did at 3 AM.
Hard to believe that Nixon was impeached due to a second rate burglary that he had no prior knowledge compare to what Hillary does today.
Click to expand...
The reality is this crap is only in the mind of the Fox and Rush driven regressives mentality being led around by the ring in their nose. She did nothing just like the 5 committee said
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
Of course its all over the place , you open so many ways to take it, with you not having a clue what the facts are. other than insults you don't contribute anyway.
Click to expand...

Well you started by distorting the budget and have been deriding "evil republicans" all over the thread. I see a lot of baiting propaganda but I don't see a lot of facts. I contributed the actual budget and a fact checking source that stated your graph and its portrayal of it was false.

I suppose you would not want to reply to me, I present facts that are counter to your propaganda. As for the facts, I seem to have a better grasp on them than you do.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
The reality is this crap is only in the mind of the Fox and Rush driven regressives mentality being led around by the ring in their nose. She did nothing just like the 5 committee said
Click to expand...

In 2013, The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent Of Its Budget On Charitable Grants. In some states, that doesn't even qualify it as a charity.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
Try to educate, care for the needy and watch and support laws and regulations without any money. Of course it depends on the waste of tax dollars on corporate handouts,military and wars like the multi trillion dollars Liars war. Brought to you by the Bush lies over WMD that Reagan Gave Saddam earlier. Two of the worst presidents in our history.
Click to expand...

In 2002, Hillary said that Saddam was giving aid and comfort to Al Qaeda

Was she lying too ?
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

jbander said:
The reality is this crap is only in the mind of the Fox and Rush driven regressives mentality being led around by the ring in their nose. She did nothing just like the 5 committee said
Click to expand...

Did those Committees have access to her subpoenaed Emails ?

Nope. And if she " did nothing " why is she at the center of a current FBI criminal investigation ?

Is the FBI part of the vast RW conspiracy? ?
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

OpportunityCost said:
In 2013, The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent Of Its Budget On Charitable Grants. In some states, that doesn't even qualify it as a charity.
Click to expand...
woopy ding.
 
Re: Do you think maybe the right has it a little ass backwards

OpportunityCost said:
Well you started by distorting the budget and have been deriding "evil republicans" all over the thread. I see a lot of baiting propaganda but I don't see a lot of facts. I contributed the actual budget and a fact checking source that stated your graph and its portrayal of it was false.

I suppose you would not want to reply to me, I present facts that are counter to your propaganda. As for the facts, I seem to have a better grasp on them than you do.
Click to expand...
and again woopy ding.
 
jbander said:
View attachment 67199688 With the regressives comes endless stupidity. They will destroy this country and it's values if they get their way. They have progressed from just being the other party to the party that will destroy everything of value that we have. The endless hate which is blatantly shown by who is left as their presidential candidates, who are the leaders of their party , it's one sick group of people.
Click to expand...

Yes the country could be destroyed by all those pie charts.;) The real problem, of course, is the size of the pie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom