• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guaranteed to Increase the Debt: Jeb's and The Donald's Tax Plans

Funny you should mention oversight....

Bush in 2001....





2003

Setting the Record Straight: Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform

So Bush called for a 3rd party regulator and the Democrats responded....Well, 72 House Democrats responded via a letter criticizing Bush's calls for third party regulator for Fannie and Freddie...


"We urge you to reconsider your Administration’s criticisms of the housing-related government sponsored enterprises (the GSEs) and instead work with Congress to strengthen the mission and oversight of the GSEs. We write as members of the House of Representatives who continually press the GSEs to do more in affordable housing.

We have been concerned that the Administration’s legislative proposal regarding the GSEs would weaken affordable housing performance by the GSEs, by emphasizing only safety and soundness. While the GSEs’ affordable housing mission is not in any way incompatible with their safety and soundness, an exclusive focus on safety and soundness is likely to come, in practice, at the expense of affordable housing.

In 2004 Bush ordered Fannie and Freddie regulator ( OFHEO ) to start its investigation into Fannie and Freddie's curious accounting practices. That led to the FIRST SEC investigation of the GSEs and the largest fine paid by a publicly traded company in American History. In 2006 Fannie Mae was fined 400 Million dollars.

There were even Congressional hearings where the Democrats do what they do best....lie





One more time...

2001

April: The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

2002

May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

And the Democrats response....

Barney Frank....

''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''







.
One more time.....

1997 Freddie Mac made history by launching the first publicly available securitization of Sub-prime loans, issuing $384.6 million of such securities.

Robert Rubin 1998...

"Since 1993, the number of home mortgage loans to African Americans increased by 58%, to Hispanics by 62% and to low- and moderate-income borrowers by 38%, well above the overall market increase.

"Since 1992, nonprofit community organizations estimate that the private sector has pledged over $1 trillion in loans and investment under CRA.



Bush was the one issuing the warnings about the two most corrupt Financial entities involved in the Sub-prime crisis. Fannie and Freddie. Run by Democrats and protected by Democrat they purchased Trillions in sub-prime loans, packaged them up and sold them off as " AAA " rated MBSs.

They were Countrywide's primary consumer and they were being run like ENRON on steroids. In 2004 a SEC investigation into Fannie Mae's corrupt accounting led to the LARGEST fine from a publicly traded company n American History. A 2011 SEC investigation found that Fannie and Freddie hid Billions in worthless debt




Yep, CONTEXT of those statements, know who else wasn't in trouble thanks to Dubya's cheering on the WORLD WIDE CREDIT BUBBLE AND BUST? ALL 5 INVESTMENT BANKS (ALL GONE TODAY) , AIG, WAMU, ETC. ALL WERE OK WHEN THE DEMS WERE TALKING ABOUT F/.F 2003-2004 ACCOUNTING SCANDALS!!!

DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW 2003-2007 THE TOTAL US SUBPRIME HAPPENED, NOTHING TO DO WITH CLINTON OR F/F

Mortgage analyst Laurie Goodman estimated that private label securitizations issued during 2005-2007 incurred a loss rate of 24%, whereas the GSE loss rate for 2005-2007 vintage loans was closer to 4%.



GSE Critics Ignore Loan Performance


GSE Critics Ignore Loan Performance | Bank Think
 
Funny you should mention oversight....

Bush in 2001....

The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

Bush in 2002.....

May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

2003

Setting the Record Straight: Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform

So Bush called for a 3rd party regulator and the Democrats responded....Well, 72 House Democrats responded via a letter criticizing Bush's calls for third party regulator for Fannie and Freddie...


"We urge you to reconsider your Administration’s criticisms of the housing-related government sponsored enterprises (the GSEs) and instead work with Congress to strengthen the mission and oversight of the GSEs. We write as members of the House of Representatives who continually press the GSEs to do more in affordable housing.

We have been concerned that the Administration’s legislative proposal regarding the GSEs would weaken affordable housing performance by the GSEs, by emphasizing only safety and soundness. While the GSEs’ affordable housing mission is not in any way incompatible with their safety and soundness, an exclusive focus on safety and soundness is likely to come, in practice, at the expense of affordable housing.

In 2004 Bush ordered Fannie and Freddie regulator ( OFHEO ) to start its investigation into Fannie and Freddie's curious accounting practices. That led to the FIRST SEC investigation of the GSEs and the largest fine paid by a publicly traded company in American History. In 2006 Fannie Mae was fined 400 Million dollars.

There were even Congressional hearings where the Democrats do what they do best....lie





One more time...

2001

April: The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

2002

May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

And the Democrats response....

Barney Frank....

''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''




One more time.....

1997 Freddie Mac made history by launching the first publicly available securitization of Sub-prime loans, issuing $384.6 million of such securities.

Robert Rubin 1998...

"Since 1993, the number of home mortgage loans to African Americans increased by 58%, to Hispanics by 62% and to low- and moderate-income borrowers by 38%, well above the overall market increase.

"Since 1992, nonprofit community organizations estimate that the private sector has pledged over $1 trillion in loans and investment under CRA.



Bush was the one issuing the warnings about the two most corrupt Financial entities involved in the Sub-prime crisis. Fannie and Freddie. Run by Democrats and protected by Democrat they purchased Trillions in sub-prime loans, packaged them up and sold them off as " AAA " rated MBSs.

They were Countrywide's primary consumer and they were being run like ENRON on steroids. In 2004 a SEC investigation into Fannie Mae's corrupt accounting led to the LARGEST fine from a publicly traded company n American History. A 2011 SEC investigation found that Fannie and Freddie hid Billions in worthless debt



Dubya could get 2 UNFUNDED tax cuts, 2 UNFUNDED wars, UNFUNDED Medicare expansion, get a law between a man and a woman (Schiavo) but couldn't get ANYTHING through the GOP Congress ON GSE REFORM except HR1461 IN 2005 WITH BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN THE HOUSE, DUBYA OPPOSED? Shocking
 
Dubya could get 2 UNFUNDED tax cuts, 2 UNFUNDED wars, UNFUNDED Medicare expansion, get a law between a man and a woman (Schiavo) but couldn't get ANYTHING through the GOP Congress ON GSE REFORM except HR1461 IN 2005 WITH BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IN THE HOUSE, DUBYA OPPOSED? Shocking

Well there were two GSE reform bills that came up for Bush's consideration.

House Bill Hr1460 and Senate Bill sb190

And screaming like a hysterical child throwing a Temper tantrum ( all CAPS ) doesn't help your credibility at all or add any validity to your continued nonsense and misinformation.

Bush chose to support sb190 over hr1460 because Barney Frank inserted a " affordable housing " slush fund in it. It also would have put off a third party regulator for a year or more.

sb190 made it through the Senate Banking commited with ZERO Democrat votes and a promise of a rule 22 Filibuster from its Democrat chair Chris Dodd if it ever made it to the floor for a vote.

So, the GOP shelved it and pushed it back through in 2007 as sb1100.

Problem is by that time the Democrats took control over the Senate and its Banking commitee and it never made it out of commitee.

And Democrats voted FOR the Iraq Resolution. In 2002 Hillary Clinton even claimed that Saddam Hussein was giving aid and comfort to Al Qaeda.

Yep. Inconvenient isn't it.
 
" Dramatic drop in underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 " The working group failed to mention that their attempt to cover the asses of the Democrats didn't square with reality or Homeownership- rates.

Why would the Bush Working Group cover Democrats? That makes no sense. Secondly, home ownership rates increased 1%, yet the share of the mortgage market for no-doc sub-primes TRIPLED. So how is it that home ownership rates grew 1%, yet sub-prime origination and share of the mortgage market tripled from 2003-2005?
 
And Democrats voted FOR the Iraq Resolution.

Based on what Bush was telling them. So the only argument you are making when you invoke this is that everyone should have known better than to trust Bush and the Conservatives when they said Iraq posed a threat to the US.

And that is precisely the reason why I will never trust anything any Conservative ever says again. Ever.
 
Well there were two GSE reform bills that came up for Bush's consideration.

House Bill Hr1460 and Senate Bill sb190

And screaming like a hysterical child throwing a Temper tantrum ( all CAPS ) doesn't help your credibility at all or add any validity to your continued nonsense and misinformation.

Bush chose to support sb190 over hr1460 because Barney Frank inserted a " affordable housing " slush fund in it. It also would have put off a third party regulator for a year or more.

sb190 made it through the Senate Banking commited with ZERO Democrat votes and a promise of a rule 22 Filibuster from its Democrat chair Chris Dodd if it ever made it to the floor for a vote.

So, the GOP shelved it and pushed it back through in 2007 as sb1100.

Problem is by that time the Democrats took control over the Senate and its Banking commitee and it never made it out of commitee.

And Democrats voted FOR the Iraq Resolution. In 2002 Hillary Clinton even claimed that Saddam Hussein was giving aid and comfort to Al Qaeda.

Yep. Inconvenient isn't it.


MORE of your right wing BS. Shocking

HR1461 didn't have a "slush fund", Barney didn't even vote for it (though he supported the goals). GOP WAS TRYING TO PRIVATIZE THE GSE'S!

Barney, the rights boogie man (hint in the GOP majority House the minority has ZERO power to insert ANYTHING the majority doesn't want!)



The 2005 bill included Frank objectives, which were to impose tighter regulation of Fannie and Freddie and new funds for rental housing. Frank and Mike Oxley achieved broad bipartisan support for the bill in the Financial Services Committee, and it passed the House. But the Senate never voted on the measure, in part because President Bush was likely to veto it. "If it had passed, that would have been one of the ways we could have reined in the bowling ball going downhill called housing," Oxley told Frank.


In an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, Lawrence B. Lindsey, a former economic adviser to President George W. Bush, wrote that Frank "is the only politician I know who has argued that we needed tighter rules that intentionally produce fewer homeowners and more renters."






DUBYA WAS THE REGULATOR OF THE GSE. HE WAS IT!!!




Freddie Mac secretly paid a Republican consulting firm $2 million to kill legislation that would have regulated and trimmed the mortgage finance gian
t and its sister company, Fannie Mae, three years before the government took control to prevent their collapse.

In the cross hairs of the campaign carried out by DCI of Washington were Republican senators and a regulatory overhaul bill sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. DCI's chief executive is Doug Goodyear, whom John McCain's campaign later hired to manage the GOP convention in September.

Freddie Mac's payments to DCI began shortly after the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee sent Hagel's bill to the then GOP-run Senate on July 28, 2005.


Unknown to the senators, DCI was undermining support for the bill in a campaign targeting 17 Republican senators in 13 states, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The states and the senators targeted changed over time, but always stayed on the Republican side.

In the end, there was not enough Republican support for Hagel's bill to warrant bringing it up for a vote because Democrats also opposed it and the votes of some would be needed for passage. The measure died at the end of the 109th Congress.


Freddie Mac Tried to Kill Republican Regulatory Bill in 2005 | Fox News


SIXTY PERCENT OF DEMS IN CONGRESS VOTED AGAINST DUBYA'S WAR OF CHOICE!!
 
Back
Top Bottom