Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > United States only > Government & Separation of Powers

Government & Separation of Powers Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference; Justice Thomas is on the ball. Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference - Yahoo! News...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-08, 09:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Corporate Drone


 
chevydriver1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Today 02:29 PM
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 3,415
Thanks: 374
Thanked 479 Times in 342 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference

Justice Thomas is on the ball.

Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference - Yahoo! News
__________________
Examples of social/religious conservatism: Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE

Examples of fiscal liberalism: Cuba, Venezuela, Europe
chevydriver1123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chevydriver1123 For This Useful Post:
Inline Ads
Old 09-19-08, 05:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Professor

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 11:57 PM
Posts: 1,795
Thanks: 346
Thanked 129 Times in 88 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference

An excellent post.
Perhaps when and indeed IF we in America cease differentiating between Irish Americans, Polish Americans, German Americans, Italian Americans, Cuban Americans, English Americans, Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Japanese Americans, Chinese Americans as well as all the other nations of the world Americans and simply call ourselves AMERICANS, we might, just might find it possible to treat everyone as a human being.
However until such does occur within the US, affirmative action will continue.
The only thing affirmative action definitely causes is dissent amongst those who are not of the groupings which receive preferential treatment.
While those that are and do, will for ever more complain that not enough is done for them.
jujuman13 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-08, 02:38 AM   #3 (permalink)
Basement Warden
Dungeon Master

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 02:15 PM
Posts: 4,766
Thanks: 1,721
Thanked 566 Times in 436 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Re: Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference

Quote:
Originally Posted by jujuman13 View Post
An excellent post.
Perhaps when and indeed IF we in America cease differentiating between Irish Americans, Polish Americans, German Americans, Italian Americans, Cuban Americans, English Americans, Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Japanese Americans, Chinese Americans as well as all the other nations of the world Americans and simply call ourselves AMERICANS, we might, just might find it possible to treat everyone as a human being.
However until such does occur within the US, affirmative action will continue.
The only thing affirmative action definitely causes is dissent amongst those who are not of the groupings which receive preferential treatment.
While those that are and do, will for ever more complain that not enough is done for them.

I am offended that you did not mention us Scottish Americans specifically.
__________________
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Bodhisattva is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-08, 07:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
TOJ
Professor


 
TOJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Last Online: Today 12:09 PM
Location: USA
Posts: 2,054
Thanks: 109
Thanked 272 Times in 223 Posts

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
I am offended that you did not mention us Scottish Americans specifically.
He probably meant for Scottish to be covered by the Irish category. No one except the Scottish and Irish would know and only the Irish would care. The Scottish would probably feel good about it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coolguy
I am more than willing to spend your money...
TOJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-08, 08:53 PM   #5 (permalink)
Guru

 
TurtleDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Today 07:48 AM
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,350
Thanks: 301
Thanked 181 Times in 140 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Tolerant
Re: Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOJ View Post
He probably meant for Scottish to be covered by the Irish category. No one except the Scottish and Irish would know and only the Irish would care. The Scottish would probably feel good about it.
Edward I (Longshanks) might agree with you-he hated them both !
__________________
SUPPORT OUR SOLDIERS
TurtleDude is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-08, 01:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Last Online: Today 12:55 AM
Posts: 52
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Gender: Male

Which constitution? It depends of the country ...

.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
... Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference ...
Which constitution? It depends of the country ...

.
oberhaenslir is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-08, 12:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Constitutionalist


 
American's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Last Online: Today 07:41 AM
Location: VA
Posts: 3,641
Thanks: 425
Thanked 699 Times in 504 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Amused
Re: Which constitution? It depends of the country ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by oberhaenslir View Post
.



Which constitution? It depends of the country ...

.
Uh...
Debate Politics Forums > United States only > Government & Separation of Powers (Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference) Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference
__________________
It's Obama's fault!
American is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-08, 06:56 AM   #8 (permalink)
Student
 
Agnapostate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Last Online: 12-02-08 02:23 AM
Posts: 201
Thanks: 7
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Pissedoff
Re: Which constitution? It depends of the country ...

Of course, Scalia #2 had no problem with affirmative action when it benefitted him...
Agnapostate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-08, 08:13 AM   #9 (permalink)
Pundit-licious

 
shuamort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Last Online: Today 12:52 PM
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 7,303
Thanks: 275
Thanked 933 Times in 532 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to shuamort Send a message via Yahoo to shuamort

Awards:
Veteran Moderator:  Thank you for all your contributions to DebatePolitics! 

Re: Thomas says Constitution forbids racial preference

I would hope that a justice has at least a passing familiarity with the Fifteenth Amendment.
shuamort is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama on Clarence Thomas (Wall Street Journal Editorial Board) MC.no.spin US Elections 9 08-18-08 07:15 PM
Commentary: Clarence Thomas has a right to be angry chevydriver1123 Archives 2 10-13-07 07:22 AM
D.C. Case Could Shape Gun Laws - Supreme Court Is Asked to Uphold Ban 26 X World Champs *Breaking News* 80 09-07-07 04:56 PM
Iraqi Constitution May Curb Women's Rights 26 X World Champs Archives 21 07-25-05 02:41 AM
Seperation of Church and State heyjoeo Archives 331 05-19-05 08:46 PM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Duke
· · ·
Member Galleries
1009 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO