| Government & Separation of Powers A simple question for Republicans...; Do you believe President Bush has the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access ... |
07-18-08, 11:50 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Nov 2004 Last Online: 07-28-08 04:22 PM Location: I was there, now I'm here
Posts: 460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| A simple question for Republicans... Do you believe President Bush has the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access to due process, and subject you to "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding?
If you answered yes, then you should rejoice, because that's exactly what President Bush has not only claimed, but actually exercised (see Yasser Esam Hamdi, Jose Padilla, Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri).
And if you answered yes, do you also believe a President Obama should have this power, or President Hillary, or President Kerry, or President Gore, or President Dukakis?
And if you answered yes, what would keep President Bush from spying on his political opponents, except his own retarded morality?
And if you answered yes, what is the difference between President Bush and every two-bit tin-pot dictator we denounce and claim moral superiority over?
And if you answered yes, how do you reconcile this with your supposed belief in "small government" and "freedom."
And if you answered yes, what's more important to you, your right to bear arms, or your right to due process, or your protection against illegal searches and seizures?
Because right now, the only thing protecting your civil liberties (remember those?) is your gun.
Watcha gonna do, watcha gonna do, when President Bush comes for you...
__________________ [INSERT DIMWITTED, BORDERLINE-OFFENSIVE SIGNATURE THAT BELIES YOUR IGNORANCE HERE] |
| |
07-22-08, 05:28 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Jul 2008 Last Online: 10-04-08 09:07 PM
Posts: 75
Thanks: 51
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Its sad but true. But I believe in taking away the guns, it will help reduce the crime and murder rate. |
| |
07-22-08, 05:32 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Conservative Independent
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: Yesterday 10:00 PM Location: Tyler TX
Posts: 2,320
Thanks: 1,148
Thanked 340 Times in 263 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by Democrat4life Its sad but true. But I believe in taking away the guns, it will help reduce the crime and murder rate. | Dear all democrats:
I am a republican(I only say this because my vote usually goes republican most of the time. I'm not afraid to vote democrat if I like him)
I classify myself VERY conservative.
and I answered no, no, no, no, no. |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to DarkWizard12 For This Useful Post: | |
07-22-08, 05:32 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Assheimer's Award winner
Join Date: Sep 2005 Last Online: Yesterday 06:47 PM Location: Nudist Capital of the World
Posts: 7,553
Thanks: 1,932
Thanked 630 Times in 490 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... too bad there is no poll
and you are a few years too late
he is out of office shortly
moving on is a healthy part of life
try it for once
__________________ These days it seems that the deadliest place on earth for an American to be is inside the womb. - Joshua P. Allem |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to DeeJayH For This Useful Post: | |
07-25-08, 12:45 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Nov 2004 Last Online: 07-28-08 04:22 PM Location: I was there, now I'm here
Posts: 460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeJayH too bad there is no poll
and you are a few years too late
he is out of office shortly
moving on is a healthy part of life
try it for once | That's your response, move on? You're right, an authoritarian jackass president claims dictatorial powers, breaks the law repeatedly, and violates your civil liberties and mine, and we should all just quit our belly aching and get over it, because the authoritarian jackass president is leaving office in a few months. Whew, I feel so much better now!
How about answering the question you conveniently avoided:
Do you believe the president should have the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access to due process, and subject you to "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding? |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to argexpat For This Useful Post: | |
07-25-08, 01:54 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Assheimer's Award winner
Join Date: Sep 2005 Last Online: Yesterday 06:47 PM Location: Nudist Capital of the World
Posts: 7,553
Thanks: 1,932
Thanked 630 Times in 490 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... might want to look at the fact that this silly thread has been up for a week
and nobody cares
moving on |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to DeeJayH For This Useful Post: | |
07-28-08, 01:56 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Nov 2004 Last Online: 07-28-08 04:22 PM Location: I was there, now I'm here
Posts: 460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeJayH might want to look at the fact that this silly thread has been up for a week
and nobody cares
moving on | It's a silly thread, yet you took the time twice to respond to it. Why don't you humor my silly thread and answer the question, yes or no? |
| |
07-28-08, 02:24 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | ROCK AND ROLL MASTER
Mod team member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Last Online: 09-10-08 11:21 PM Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 11,296
Thanks: 533
Thanked 1,077 Times in 761 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by Democrat4life Its sad but true. But I believe in taking away the guns, it will help reduce the crime and murder rate. | There's more reason to believe in Santa Claus.
__________________ "Men cannot escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others."
- Theodore Roosevelt |
| | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to galenrox For This Useful Post: | |
07-28-08, 03:03 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Sage
Join Date: May 2007 Last Online: 10-01-08 01:17 AM
Posts: 7,445
Thanks: 1,927
Thanked 666 Times in 503 Posts
Awards: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat Do you believe President Bush has the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access to due process, and subject you to "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding?
If you answered yes, then you should rejoice, because that's exactly what President Bush has not only claimed, but actually exercised (see Yasser Esam Hamdi, Jose Padilla, Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri). | Yes, he has the power. And he has the right. And he does so with a majority of America's approval. Unfortunately, John McCain doesn't believe in enhanced interrogation. But, on the bright side, both McCain AND Obama both approve of the need for the government to be able to listen to terrorist exchanges. Quote:
Wednesday July 9, 2008 14:11 EDT Congress votes to immunize lawbreaking telecoms, legalize warrantless eavesdropping
The Democratic-led Congress this afternoon voted to put an end to the NSA spying scandal, as the Senate approved a bill -- approved last week by the House -- to immunize lawbreaking telecoms, terminate all pending lawsuits against them, and vest whole new warrantless eavesdropping powers in the President. The vote in favor of the new FISA bill was 69-28. Barack Obama joined every Senate Republican (and every House Republican other than one) by voting in favor of it, while his now-vanquished primary rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, voted against it. John McCain wasn't present for any of the votes, but shared Obama's support for the bill. The bill will now be sent to an extremely happy George Bush, who already announced that he enthusiastically supports it, and he will sign it into law very shortly. Congress votes to immunize lawbreaking telecoms, legalize warrantless eavesdropping - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com | My advice to you? Don't talk to terrorists. Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat And if you answered yes, do you also believe a President Obama should have this power, or President Hillary, or President Kerry, or President Gore, or President Dukakis? | I don't believe there should be a President Barack Obama. But if there is one, I do believe he should have this power. (And it's not that HE would have this power, really, but as you are propagandizing in big broad strokes I will not quibble too much.)
But, strangely, I WILL agree with you here on what is a very subtle point. I don't believe that Michael Dukakis should have had the power to engage in warrantless eavesdropping because at the time when he would have served as President there was no need for such tools. Islamism had not proven itself to be a direct threat to the United States in 1988. That changed in 1993 with the first World Trade Center attack. Ever since then we have had a need to know what bad guys are talking about in our country. Warrantless wiretaps were FINALLY made a well employed tool of law enforcement during the G.W. Bush administration when technology progressed to the point where the bad guys had the edge over the good guys. And make no mistake about it, the American people expect the Government to use the powers we give them to keep us safe from bad guys, as much as possible.
There was no need for this in 1988 when Dukakis ran for President. But the threat DID exist in 2000 when Gore ran and in 2004 when Kerry ran.
Including Hillary in the list was just your effort to impress us with your knowledge and preparation, right?
And I AM impressed! I'm impressed at how much you have studied American political history in order to try to blend in here. The average poster would not be able to list the past Democratic nominees as you have so nicely done. (I'm also wondering how well you might have prepared yourself in studying the Holy Bible in order to achieve immediate credibility in a discussion of Christianity.) Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat And if you answered yes, what would keep President Bush from spying on his political opponents, except his own retarded morality? | That's one of the things that makes recruitment and preparation to join the ranks of the internet vanguards against the USA such an exciting endeavor. The political climate is always changing. Bush has 6 months left in office. And only 100 days left before the election to determine who the NEXT president will be.
The only thing that would POSSIBLY cause Bush to continue on as President might be if the enemies of freedom were to plan a massive attack on the USA around the time of the election or afterwards. And if he HAD to stay on a little bit longer I can understand how his enemies might wish to continue building up the hatred toward him.
Do you know something we don't?
Should the FBI be reading this thread?
Bush is going to retire and a new President will be chosen on Nov. 4th. So, ease up on W. He has kept us safe and kept the enemies of freedom on the defensive and hurt them all over the world. He deserves our gratitude and admiration. If you love freedom you should thank him and include him in your prayers. No matter who you might pray to. Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat And if you answered yes, what is the difference between President Bush and every two-bit tin-pot dictator we denounce and claim moral superiority over? | This. YouTube - Bush Flubs
He supports and defends the Constitution which allows freedom of expression. He has a sense of humor about himself which is endearing. And he is going to retire from public service in 6 months.
THAT is what separates him from tin-horned (you need to study your idioms more) dictators.
Oh, and one more thing, he kept the whole world from exploding into war while keeping the American people safe for 8 years. No one can deny that.
At least no knowledgeable person. Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat And if you answered yes, how do you reconcile this with your supposed belief in "small government" and "freedom." | Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures. Lincoln and FDR, just to name two, also expanded their use of tools which are made available to the Commander in Chief during times of War because he NEEDS to maintain law, order and stability at home in order to successfully prosecute the war. Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat And if you answered yes, what's more important to you, your right to bear arms, or your right to due process, or your protection against illegal searches and seizures? | When elephants are in the wire some people start bitczing about pissants in the cupboard. Please grow a better sense of priorities. Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat Because right now, the only thing protecting your civil liberties (remember those?) is your gun.
Watcha gonna do, watcha gonna do, when President Bush comes for you... |
Here's my advice for anyone who thinks your post has any merit.  |
| |
07-28-08, 10:02 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Aiming Anti-Stupid Gun
Join Date: Apr 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 10:29 PM Location: Land of the Anti-Stupid
Posts: 2,368
Thanks: 61
Thanked 423 Times in 297 Posts
| Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by galenrox There's more reason to believe in Santa Claus. | Unless it's black market guns.
__________________ "They are the key to my eventual rise to the throne. Why would I abandon them?"
"Because I have asked you. And because your loyalty to our people should be greater than your ambition. And because I have poisoned your drink." |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |