| Government & Separation of Powers A simple question for Republicans...; Originally Posted by argexpat
That's your response, move on? You're right, an authoritarian jackass president claims dictatorial powers, ... |
10-11-08, 02:39 AM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | Basement Warden
Dungeon Master
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: Yesterday 02:15 PM
Posts: 4,766
Thanks: 1,721
Thanked 566 Times in 436 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat That's your response, move on? You're right, an authoritarian jackass president claims dictatorial powers, breaks the law repeatedly, and violates your civil liberties and mine, and we should all just quit our belly aching and get over it, because the authoritarian jackass president is leaving office in a few months. Whew, I feel so much better now!
How about answering the question you conveniently avoided:
Do you believe the president should have the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access to due process, and subject you to "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding? | Spying on the people is not in the Bill of Rights... they can pass any law that they want to in that regard, and we can exercise our power to change it back if need be. Democracy... maybe you should look into what it is all about.
Since we have due process: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. FindLaw: U.S. Constitution: Fifth Amendment
Any "law" or action to the contrary is expressly forbidden. It is up to the people to hound their elected officials if they want action taken. When there is an apathetic populace, then the leaders will do as they see fit, and if that violates law, then that is just how it goes...
__________________ War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength |
| |
10-12-08, 04:40 AM
|
#32 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2008 Last Online: 10-14-08 08:53 AM
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... I'm not a republican, but.. I like them a whole lot more then democrats, so why the hell not? Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat Do you believe President Bush has the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access to due process, and subject you to "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding? | No. That is to say, I don't believe it's right. Buuuut, as long as it's not done to me.. I don't really care.. if it was done to a prochoicer I'd applaud and support the president/government. Ain't cause I think it's right, I know it isn't right. I just don't care and figure my enemy's enemy is my friend right? Quote: |
If you answered yes, then you should rejoice, because that's exactly what President Bush has not only claimed, but actually exercised (see Yasser Esam Hamdi, Jose Padilla, Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri).
| Hurp-durp! You'd have to live under a rock not to know about the wiretappings and toture.. But to be fair, they even do it to eachother. Jesse Jackson bitched about it and writes how they tapped his phone in his book. I didn't read it, I simply saw him on Hannity&Colmes. I wouldn't buy a choicetard's book.. Quote: |
And if you answered yes, do you also believe a President Obama should have this power, or President Hillary, or President Kerry, or President Gore, or President Dukakis?
| No, cause that increases the likelyhood they'd wiretap me! George Bush might spare me as I'm right-wing.. Obama not so much.. Quote: |
And if you answered yes, what would keep President Bush from spying on his political opponents, except his own retarded morality?
| Nothing. Who says the government isn't working against itself? It would explain why it's so incompetent and messed up now wouldn't it? But hey, better they gnipping at eachother's hells then your's right? Quote: |
And if you answered yes, what is the difference between President Bush and every two-bit tin-pot dictator we denounce and claim moral superiority over?
| Not a whole lot. You've got to know when to hold'em and now when to fold'em. Pick your battles I say.. As long as abortions banned and I can get my girlfriend to the states. I wouldn't care if we lived in a dictatorship or libertarian state. Quote: |
And if you answered yes, how do you reconcile this with your supposed belief in "small government" and "freedom."
| Apathy.
Misanthropy.
Sadism.
I could be a libertarian, but still do the exact opposite because of how I emotionally handle the situation. Which is sortof how it is.. Quote: |
And if you answered yes, what's more important to you, your right to bear arms, or your right to due process, or your protection against illegal searches and seizures?
| Right to due process. More then anything I've defended people's right to a fair trial. By judge, jury, and with a state provided lawyer if need be. Yes, even for babykilling prochoicers. It's one of my core values. If you can find it inbetween all the hatred and angst.. Quote: |
Because right now, the only thing protecting your civil liberties (remember those?) is your gun.
| That's really ever the only thing dude. Noone is going to help you, noone gives a **** about you. That's why I became a libertarian-leaning indi in the first place.
Government was not going to provide for me.
People are inheritly selfish and stupid.
Santa Claus isn't real, so why would I just put a different name on him such as compassionate conservatism or democratic socialism? Quote: |
Watcha gonna do, watcha gonna do, when President Bush comes for you...
| "Don't kill me! I got a wife on the internet and two kids that are actually dogs!
Kill the prochoicer down the street instead!"
__________________ Shared joy is a double joy; shared sorrow is half a sorrow. |
| |
10-14-08, 01:21 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Student
Join Date: Aug 2008 Last Online: 12-02-08 11:50 PM Location: East coast
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote: |
No. That is to say, I don't believe it's right. Buuuut, as long as it's not done to me.. I don't really care.. if it was done to a prochoicer I'd applaud and support the president/government. Ain't cause I think it's right, I know it isn't right. I just don't care and figure my enemy's enemy is my friend right?
| Quote:
Government was not going to provide for me.
People are inheritly selfish and stupid.
Santa Claus isn't real, so why would I just put a different name on him such as compassionate conservatism or democratic socialism?
| Jim
First I have to ask if everything is OK?
I did not quote it all, but that stuff was concerning.
Anyhow the idea is to be protecting what is most important, and as a country and people upholding the constitution and protecting all our or every American citizens rights should be of the utmost importance.
Saying you believe something not to be right, but allowing yourself to accept it through denial due to it not currently or previously happening to you is just well WRONG. If we do not stand up for what we know to be right, and continue to allow things to deteriorate as we have just what will we end up with, and will anyone be happy with it?
If we continue to allow our leaders no matter their party affiliation to continue to strip us of our liberties just what will we have in the end?
I really believe it is time to cut all the BS and for everyone who honestly loves and believes in this country and our freedoms to get off their lazy azzes and be a part of making it great again as it once was.
We have for way too long looked to others to take care of everything for us, and it seems for many this is a loss of desire to take of care of things for ones self, and this is a large part of our problems today and must change.
I also find it odd that someone who seemingly hates what you call "prochoicers" so much for basically taking away the rights or choice of the unborn to so willing allow his own choices and rights to be compromised.
I treasure my rights, and am willing to fight for them, and hope you do as well.
__________________ ************************* Question Everything |
| |
10-14-08, 01:35 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Oct 2008 Last Online: 10-14-08 02:02 AM
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... On the note of dont talk to terrorists i have to say dont vote for one either barack hussein obama is a terrorist and he will end our country. Guns are the only way for me to protect myself from his retarded rule if it occures so Please give me guns. |
| |
10-15-08, 12:47 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
| | Student
Join Date: Aug 2008 Last Online: 12-02-08 11:50 PM Location: East coast
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by TheForgiven On the note of dont talk to terrorists i have to say dont vote for one either barack hussein obama is a terrorist and he will end our country. Guns are the only way for me to protect myself from his retarded rule if it occures so Please give me guns. |
You know there has been so much information on this whole connection with Islam fundamentalists and his causes for changing his name from Barry, and even the connections with friends from his time in school etc that really beg to be investigated.
I wish I had more information or answers on this, but it is looking only lots and lots of questions.
One thing I do know for sure is that those who are backing him seem not to care if there was a connection with Osama himself, and that really scares me.
Is there any truth to any of this thinking? |
| |
10-17-08, 03:40 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | Student
Join Date: Oct 2008 Last Online: Today 12:51 AM
Posts: 237
Thanks: 37
Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by Democrat4life Its sad but true. But I believe in taking away the guns, it will help reduce the crime and murder rate. | That is false. If you are against guns, would you be willing to put a sign on your front step : "We do not believe in gun ownership."??
In Sweden, there is a mandatory gun ownership for all citizens over the age of 21. And guess what, they also have the LOWEST crime rate.
Fact of the matter is, if you wanted to say rob a bank, and you knew that 15 of 20 potential hostages are going to be armed, would YOU rethink your plan?? Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeJayH too bad there is no poll
and you are a few years too late
he is out of office shortly
moving on is a healthy part of life
try it for once | Ready for a like minded a-hole to take his place... and will take full advantage of the laws that Bush took so long to get created. Quote:
Originally Posted by LennyD Have to agree with that.
What do those who would drag us into socialism deserve? | A fair trial for the culprits, their familes, and their close affiliates. The assets seized and socialized to pay for their crimes, and a conviction by a jury of their peers. Quote:
Originally Posted by phrank I totally agree Lenny. If we want to be free and not give our government the ability to spy on those it suspects could harm us, then let's not be screened at airports any longer. Just where do we draw the freedom line? | Let's differentiate between public and private :
- In public, sidewalks, streets, government buildings, etc are all public places where your rights and freedoms should be guaranteed 100% . No EXCEPTIONS!!! The idea of 'Free speach' rights wasn't to guarantee popular speach; but rather to protect UNPOPULAR speech.
- An airport, highschool, university, bowling alley, coffee shop, etc is PRIVATE property. While this does not exempt these places from 'breaking laws'; it DOES allow them to decide on what level of freedom you're allowed. In an airport, it's the AIRPORTS responsibility to guarantee security of all passengers. Since they are liable they are allowed to take whatever security steps they deem fit...
This is really OVER-simplified, but is an important distinction on what, where and how the constitution protects us.
__________________ "It's called the 'American Dream' because you have to be asleep to believe it." - George Carlin |
| |
11-03-08, 01:36 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
| | Educator
Join Date: Oct 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 04:17 PM
Posts: 654
Thanks: 134
Thanked 109 Times in 87 Posts
Lean: Private Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by argexpat Do you believe President Bush has the power to spy on you without a warrant, imprison you indefinitely without access to due process, and subject you to "enhanced interrogation" techniques such as waterboarding?
If you answered yes, then you should rejoice, because that's exactly what President Bush has not only claimed, but actually exercised (see Yasser Esam Hamdi, Jose Padilla, Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri).
And if you answered yes, do you also believe a President Obama should have this power, or President Hillary, or President Kerry, or President Gore, or President Dukakis?
And if you answered yes, what would keep President Bush from spying on his political opponents, except his own retarded morality?
And if you answered yes, what is the difference between President Bush and every two-bit tin-pot dictator we denounce and claim moral superiority over?
And if you answered yes, how do you reconcile this with your supposed belief in "small government" and "freedom."
And if you answered yes, what's more important to you, your right to bear arms, or your right to due process, or your protection against illegal searches and seizures?
Because right now, the only thing protecting your civil liberties (remember those?) is your gun.
Watcha gonna do, watcha gonna do, when President Bush comes for you... | That doesn't work anymore. Once Obama had the nomination secured, he reversed himself and voted for FISA. Other than ranting against rich CEOs, after voting to give rich CEOs $150 billion in tax exemptions and $700 billion in free money, Obama is exactly Bush. So is McCain. You lost this issue however you vote.
__________________ "Men are dying out as the Y chromosome withers, female based artificial sperm has been developed and sociologists bemoan the growing triumph of girls over boys at every level of education, leading to the inevitable question of whether the male gender has reached the end of its natural usefulness." Dr. B Sykes, Human Genetics, Oxford |
| |
11-12-08, 01:07 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
| | Educator
Join Date: Oct 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 04:17 PM
Posts: 654
Thanks: 134
Thanked 109 Times in 87 Posts
Lean: Private Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Obama voted for FISA too. It was McCain, not Obama, who spoke against torture on the campaign trail.
Obama wants a domestic federal police/military force equal in size and cost to the entire US military. 3 MILLION federal police - WATCHING YOU.
Bush was not the one to fear. |
| |
11-12-08, 02:04 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
| | Guru
Join Date: Jul 2006 Last Online: Today 02:23 AM
Posts: 3,231
Thanks: 215
Thanked 266 Times in 198 Posts
Current Mood: | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by Democrat4life But I believe in taking away the guns, it will help reduce the crime and murder rate. | You try to take MY guns and you will increase the murder rate. By one. |
| |
11-12-08, 02:20 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
| | Student
Join Date: Oct 2008 Last Online: Today 12:51 AM
Posts: 237
Thanks: 37
Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Gender:  | Re: A simple question for Republicans... Quote:
Originally Posted by Voidwar You try to take MY guns and you will increase the murder rate. By one. | It's this attitude that is boosting gun and ammo sales in the US... in the face of a new president that has already announced his anti-gun plan. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |