So let's start with the enemies of the Constitution as defined, the word "enemy" as defined here by the dictionary.
And I want to take a look again at Frances Fox Piven, because we could take the metal detector and try to find some history of violence with Rush Limbaugh, but you're not going to find it.
What you are going to find is Frances Fox Piven's article. Remember, she should know who she is dealing with here. Piven's article in The Nation came out earlier in month. And I want to go over -- I want to go over some important parts. She said -- and we've gone over some of this -- "So where are the angry crowds, the demonstrations, the sit-ins, and the unruly mobs? After all, the injustice is apparent."
Unruly mobs, like in Greece.
She goes on to say, "Mass protest might change the president's posture if they succeeded in pressing him hard from his base, something that hasn't happened so far in this administration" -- suggesting get out into the streets.
...
Then she says, "Second, before the people can mobilize for collective action, they have to develop a proud and angry identity."
...
She goes on, "An effective movement of the employed would look something like the strikes and riots that has spread across Greece and in response to the austerity measures forced on the Greek government by the European Union or like the student protest that recently spread with lightning speed across England in response to the prospect of greatly increased school fees."
You have it? It's not, hey, let's get together in the Tea Party. She's saying it should look like the video I showed you in Greece.
Is that not inciting riots? Is that not asking for violence? Is this not outlining and how to make it happen?