• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Champion Government Health Insurance

Conservative said:
Whipsnade said:
You are simply hopeless, we pay debt service which today is the fourth largest budget item on the actual debt, not a percentage of GDP. Further revenue includes SS and Medicare but the public debt doesn't include the intergovt. holding deficits which when you take money out of Intergovt. holdings and put it on budget you create a shortfall in that area which also has to be serviced. You simply don't understand the budget, surplus, fiscal responsibility, taxes, or even basic economics. You are exactly the kind of supporter Obama loves having.
Click to expand...

So what do you think a conservative president is going to do?
Click to expand...
 
winston53660 said:
Conservative said:
So what do you think a conservative president is going to do?
Click to expand...

A conservative President would make hard choices and actually focus on pro growth and revenue generation to pay down the massive debt we have today. Don't know who that Conservative President is going to be but anyone beats the alternative to what we have.
Click to expand...
 
Conservative said:
winston53660 said:
A conservative President would make hard choices and actually focus on pro growth and revenue generation to pay down the massive debt we have today. Don't know who that Conservative President is going to be but anyone beats the alternative to what we have.
Click to expand...

expenditures_function.PNG


Hey con.Check out this graph; pay particular attention to the dates. Notice anything odd? Also what were the dates of last conservative republican president?:2wave:
Click to expand...
 
Conservative said:
Donc said:
You actually need to get someone to help you read the chart. Social spending, right?
Click to expand...


NAH! Bo's spending on the SS is at the same level as it was when he took office. Besides the cap shouldda been cut off of SS when he took office. Think of the future geezers for once in your miserable life.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...
 
Donc said:
Conservative said:
NAH! Bo's spending on the SS is at the same level as it was when he took office. Besides the cap shouldda been cut off of SS when he took office. Think of the future geezers for once in your miserable life.:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Got it, people are forced into contributing to SS and Medicare and when they retire they are to think of future retirees instead of getting their own investment back. That is liberal arrogance and may appeal to the Gruber liberal base, the stupid ones.
Click to expand...
 
Conservative said:
Donc said:
Got it, people are forced into contributing to SS and Medicare and when they retire they are to think of future retirees instead of getting their own investment back. That is liberal arrogance and may appeal to the Gruber liberal base, the stupid ones.
Click to expand...

What have you against the 1% of income earners whom receive 23% of pre-tax income coughing up a few extra quid for SS? After all, they can afford it. Half of the population in this country lives in poverty now and they have to kick in SS 12 months. The top 1%...after one month, many of them has SS paid up for the year now. That’s not fair.:(
Click to expand...
 
Donc said:
Conservative said:
What have you against the 1% of income earners whom receive 23% of pre-tax income coughing up a few extra quid for SS? After all, they can afford it. Half of the population in this country lives in poverty now and they have to kick in SS 12 months. The top 1%...after one month, many of them has SS paid up for the year now. That’s not fair.:(
Click to expand...

If the upper 1% want to do that then I have no problem with it. I do have a problem with anyone being forced into SS and Medicare and the govt. wasting that money on items other than SS and Medicare and then calling for the people who contributed to pony up more. You call that being fair, forcing someone to contribute then cutting their benefits or forcing them to contribute more?

SS was never intended to be a sole retirement income for anyone and yet people were forced to contribute. That is what liberalism does to people appeal to their hearts and then screws them because there is never enough money to pay for the liberal spending appetite?
Click to expand...
 
Conservative said:
Donc said:
If the upper 1% want to do that then I have no problem with it. I do have a problem with anyone being forced into SS and Medicare and the govt. wasting that money on items other than SS and Medicare and then calling for the people who contributed to pony up more. You call that being fair, forcing someone to contribute then cutting their benefits or forcing them to contribute more?

SS was never intended to be a sole retirement income for anyone and yet people were forced to contribute. That is what liberalism does to people appeal to their hearts and then screws them because there is never enough money to pay for the liberal spending appetite?
Click to expand...



This video mustta been your fav when you came of age eh con?The trouble was you musht have not gone beyond this first verse.

"Go ahead and hate your neighbor
Go ahead and cheat a friend
Do it in the name of heaven
You can justify it in the end"

SAD indeed.:(
Click to expand...
 
Conservative said:
If the upper 1% want to do that then I have no problem with it. I do have a problem with anyone being forced into SS and Medicare and the govt. wasting that money on items other than SS and Medicare and then calling for the people who contributed to pony up more. You call that being fair, forcing someone to contribute then cutting their benefits or forcing them to contribute more?

SS was never intended to be a sole retirement income for anyone and yet people were forced to contribute. That is what liberalism does to people appeal to their hearts and then screws them because there is never enough money to pay for the liberal spending appetite?
Click to expand...

Man you are still funny as can be as well as oblivious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom