Antidepressants as a factor in violent crime

CaptainCourtesy · 11-12-09, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT

have you ever progressed beyond kindergarden in your logic ?

i am sorry but i heard that argument when i was 3.

And obviously you still fail to understand it or know how to defend it.

Quote:

would you mind explaining how me smoking a joint at home is interfering with your lack of vacuum ?

Would you mind showing me where I said that specific thing? You are again demonstrating the flaw in your entire position. You think in black or white terms. Life is made up of shades of gray. You smoking a joint in the privacy of your own home has no impact on me. You smoking a joint in your own home and then driving does. See? Not black or white.

Quote:

also stop thanking the mods you ass kissers.

Moderator's Warning:

I advice you to stop the personal attacks that you levied in your post.

CaptainCourtesy · 11-12-09, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT

i would actually support any law limiting behavior in public. i don't think nudity should be allowed in public for example. i also don't think smoking should be allowed in public indoor places.

however you can have sex with anything you want as long as you're not forcing anybody into it. you can take any drugs you want even when you're driving your car. and you can have any kind of guns you want at your home. when you go outside probably shouldn't be allowed to have anything automatic.

pretty simple. any ****ing idiot can understand this. only 99% of people can't because they never think in the first place. they repeat dogmas beaten into their stupid ****ing heads at age 3.

And everything you said makes sense...except what is in bold. Pretty simple concept.

CaptainCourtesy · 11-12-09, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT

at least Korimyr is taking an original position. i don't care how wrong it is - at least he is trying to think.

but you are being a mindless repeater. a sheep like everybody else. i hope you don't actually think that ideas in your head are a product of logic.

The problem isn't that the position is not logical; the problem is that you don't like the position. Too bad. You have yet to prove that the position that your behavior can impact others is illogical.

NEUROSPORT · 11-13-09, 12:10 AM

as far as driving under influence the punishment should come after you actually run somebody over.

i am sure Michael Schumacher can drive drunk better than many people can drive sober.

yet sober people most of the time don't get arrested when they get into an accident. and drunk people get arrested even when hey haven't done anything.

i don't believe in PRE-CRIME.

Korimyr the Rat · 11-13-09, 12:30 AM

Getting into an automobile accident isn't a crime. Recklessly endangering others is.

CaptainCourtesy · 11-13-09, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT

as far as driving under influence the punishment should come after you actually run somebody over.

No, it should not. You are taking a fatalistic approach. Let's get rid of every vaccine and only cure illness rather than prevent them.

You don't close the barn door after the horse are gone.

Quote:

i am sure Michael Schumacher can drive drunk better than many people can drive sober.

A drunk Michael Schumacher is a hazard on the road. It has been proven that driving drunk impairs one's driving ability and significantly increases accidents and injuries. Your position on this denies absolute facts.

Quote:

yet sober people most of the time don't get arrested when they get into an accident. and drunk people get arrested even when hey haven't done anything.

Depends on whether or not they are at fault. As it has been proven that driving under the influence impairs your ability to drive, you are putting others at risk. Your rights to do what you want STOP where mine begin.

Quote:

i don't believe in PRE-CRIME.

Since driving under the influence IS a crime, as it endangers others, you have no point, here.

NEUROSPORT · 11-13-09, 11:24 PM

to both of you:

do you know what vacuum means ?

look in the mirror ...

any lemming can be an apologist for the state.

people like you managed to defend communism, apartheid, slavery and everything else. your ability to engage in doublethink doesn't impress me.

let's make being black a crime ! after all being black increases your chances of being convicted of a crime about as much as drinking increases your chances of getting into an accident.

why wait for the robbery or homicide to occur ? that would be closing the barn door after the horses are gone.

homicide is not a crime ! being black is the crime ! you better learned to think straight before i send you to a re-education camp !

11-13-09, 12:10 AM	#44
NEUROSPORT Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Last Seen: 12-23-09 03:40 PM Location: Silicon Valley Posts: 616 Thanks: 12 Thanked 41 Times in 36 Posts Lean: Libertarian Gender:	Re: Antidepressants as a factor in violent crime as far as driving under influence the punishment should come after you actually run somebody over. i am sure Michael Schumacher can drive drunk better than many people can drive sober. yet sober people most of the time don't get arrested when they get into an accident. and drunk people get arrested even when hey haven't done anything. i don't believe in PRE-CRIME.

11-13-09, 12:30 AM	#45
Korimyr the Rat Despotism for Dummies Mod Team Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Last Seen: Today 02:32 PM Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming Posts: 6,202 Thanks: 2,023 Thanked 3,882 Times in 1,919 Posts Gender: Total Awards: 1	Re: Antidepressants as a factor in violent crime Getting into an automobile accident isn't a crime. Recklessly endangering others is.
	__________________

11-13-09, 11:24 PM	#47
NEUROSPORT Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Last Seen: 12-23-09 03:40 PM Location: Silicon Valley Posts: 616 Thanks: 12 Thanked 41 Times in 36 Posts Lean: Libertarian Gender:	Re: Antidepressants as a factor in violent crime to both of you: do you know what vacuum means ? look in the mirror ... any lemming can be an apologist for the state. people like you managed to defend communism, apartheid, slavery and everything else. your ability to engage in doublethink doesn't impress me. let's make being black a crime ! after all being black increases your chances of being convicted of a crime about as much as drinking increases your chances of getting into an accident. why wait for the robbery or homicide to occur ? that would be closing the barn door after the horses are gone. homicide is not a crime ! being black is the crime ! you better learned to think straight before i send you to a re-education camp !

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following User Says Thank You to Korimyr the Rat For This Useful Post:
CaptainCourtesy