• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Quietly Releases More Clinton Email Records

Excon

Excon

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2012
Messages
40,615
Reaction score
9,087
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed

The FBI late Sunday night released additional documents related to the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, posting the information on its website and doing so without sending out a release or announcing the move.

WikiLeaks reported the news first.

The documents can be found in full on the FBI site and, contain information regarding the FBI's investigation into Clinton after it received computer hardware and additional emails from Clinton’s lawyers.

[...]

FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed​




FBI Releases More Clinton Email Records - Smoking Gun - Judge Andrew Napolitano - Lou Dobbs

​
 
Wait... what happened to Comey's stated commitment to provide that information to the applicable Congressional Investigations committee(s)? I guess that only applied when Clinton was in the running for Commander-in-chief.
 
Reiterates suspicions that the FBI/DOJ were in cahoots to keep this info from the public and protect HRC.

She may have done considerable damage to our country's security all on her own.
 
Last edited:
Maybe the hacking bs was intended to be a distraction from the reality here.
 
Excon said:
FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed

The FBI late Sunday night released additional documents related to the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, posting the information on its website and doing so without sending out a release or announcing the move.

WikiLeaks reported the news first.

The documents can be found in full on the FBI site and, contain information regarding the FBI's investigation into Clinton after it received computer hardware and additional emails from Clinton’s lawyers.

[...]

FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed​




FBI Releases More Clinton Email Records - Smoking Gun - Judge Andrew Napolitano - Lou Dobbs

​
Click to expand...


Those yoga and grandma emails ? :lol:
 
Excon said:
Maybe the hacking bs was intended to be a distraction from the reality here.
Click to expand...

The only reason the hacking because a big deal was because Trump made it one dismissing it out of hand and attacking intelligence agencies. It seems quite foolish to me for someone to suggest that Republicans and Democrats became alarmed and angered over that behavior in order to distract you from Hillary Clinton.
 
Mr Person said:
The only reason the hacking because a big deal was because Trump made it one dismissing it out of hand and attacking intelligence agencies. It seems quite foolish to me for someone to suggest that Republicans and Democrats became alarmed and angered over that behavior in order to distract you from Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...

The Left is running with the hacking as a crime equivalent to Watergate. [cause it's all they got] I have yet to see anything but supposition. "If it quacks like a duck"...isn't good intelligence work.
 
WCH said:
The Left is running with the hacking as a crime equivalent to Watergate. I have yet to see anything but supposition. "If it quacks like a duck"...isn't good intelligence work.
Click to expand...

Do you really think it's odd that people would start making suppositions when a newly elected President who hadn't even bothered with intelligence briefings rejects out of hand reports of possible election interference by a foreign power?

I don't. That's exactly the kind of thing one would be drawn to make suppositions about, because why on Earth would an incoming American President act that way?




Of course, I do find it bitterly hilarious how the left is being criticized for "suppositions" and "running with the hacking as a crime equivalent to Watergate" in the millionth thread about Hillary's private ****ing email server. That has to be the most overblown story of the century and the right is still clinging to it like it's the biggest news in town.
 
It's really disturbing that Trump would reject the CIA's conclusions which means he thinks they are either incompetent or just lying.

But it's par for the course for that buffoon. He's done it before, by claiming Bush lied about IRAQ WMD.Since Bush was merely passing on info from the CIa, that means he thinks the CIA lied.
 
Mr Person said:
Do you really think it's odd that people would start making suppositions when a newly elected President who hadn't even bothered with intelligence briefings rejects out of hand reports of possible election interference by a foreign power?

I don't. That's exactly the kind of thing one would be drawn to make suppositions about, because why on Earth would an incoming American President act that way?




Of course, I do find it bitterly hilarious how the left is being criticized for "suppositions" and "running with the hacking as a crime equivalent to Watergate" in the millionth thread about Hillary's private ****ing email server. That has to be the most overblown story of the century and the right is still clinging to it like it's the biggest news in town.
Click to expand...

Not worried about her selling out of America are you?
 
WCH said:
Not worried about her selling out of America are you?
Click to expand...

And how, pray tell, did Hillary "sell out" America? Or are you asking me whether she would sell out America (whatever that means) if she had one?



I continue to think the email server issue was overblown. It was bad, but nothing like what the GOP played it up to be. (Nevermind that they only found out about it by going on a seven-investigation witch hunt designed to try to hurt her with Benghazi. It's not like the GOP decided that it was important to make sure our computers are really secure and discovered this in the course of that investigation.)



The FBI found she was careless but was just about as careless with sensitive info as the last 5 SoS's - a detail her biggest detractors find necessary to ignore - it's just that her carelessness played out over a private email server. It also said it had never charged someone in similar circumstances, that all cases in which they recommended charges involved aggravating factors.

Nobody has proved this false or even tried.

And unlike Trump, she at least made a show of apologizing and saying it was a stupid thing to do.




So no, I do not think that being negligent with emails indicates a desire to "sell out America", whatever that's supposed to mean. I do think Trump's history shows he is willing to sell anyone or anything out as long as it helps his image. Selling out America would not help his image, so no, I do not think he is plotting to do so. Then again, unlike many conservatives who speak about Hillary, I never suggested that Trump is actually evil.

I'm still pretty damn concerned that he thought it would be OK to ignore intelligence briefings and then, when confronted with reports of potential interference in our election, he thought it'd be fine to attack the intelligence agencies for reporting on this intelligence.

Nobody has any business defending him for that while criticizing Hillary over an email server.
 
Excon said:
FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed

The FBI late Sunday night released additional documents related to the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, posting the information on its website and doing so without sending out a release or announcing the move.

WikiLeaks reported the news first.

The documents can be found in full on the FBI site and, contain information regarding the FBI's investigation into Clinton after it received computer hardware and additional emails from Clinton’s lawyers.

[...]

FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed​




FBI Releases More Clinton Email Records - Smoking Gun - Judge Andrew Napolitano - Lou Dobbs

​
Click to expand...


So was there anything new in the emails that we didn't already know?

Newsmax headline is misleading and out of context to what it says in it's article....but then why would you expect anything less from a fake news website?

..."that hostile foreign actors successfully gained access to the personal email accounts of individuals associated with whom Clinton was in regular contact and, in doing so, obtained emails sent to or received by Clinton on her personal account...."​


At least they called the Russians "hostile foreign actors" instead of BFF.
 
Moot said:
So was there anything new in the emails that we didn't already know?
Click to expand...
Well, Judge Andrew Napolitano seems to think this "is a smoking gun if ever there was one".


Moot said:
Newsmax headline is misleading and out of context to what it says in it's article....but then why would you expect anything less from a fake news website?
Click to expand...
Wut?

Headline.
FBI Releases More Hillary Emails, Says 'Hostile Foreign Actors' Accessed​

What you quoted as being reported.
..."that hostile foreign actors successfully gained access to the personal email accounts of individuals associated with whom Clinton was in regular contact and, in doing so, obtained emails sent to or received by Clinton on her personal account...."​


The problem seems to be with your understanding of what you read.
 
I think both sides that have posted here are missing the point - American politicians, whether they are Republicans or Democrats, whether they were with Hillary or against her, whether they are with Trump or against him, are getting out of control with their abuses of power. Trump is endangering national security by refusing to commit to intel briefings, and Hillary endangered national security by exposing state secrets via a private email server.
 
Mr Person said:
The only reason the hacking because a big deal was because Trump made it one dismissing it out of hand and attacking intelligence agencies. It seems quite foolish to me for someone to suggest that Republicans and Democrats became alarmed and angered over that behavior in order to distract you from Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...
1. The only reason folks have made a big deal out of the supposed hacking is because of politics.
2.They released this info with announcement. There is a reason for that. There is no way they didn't know the supposed info about Trump was going to be released.


Mr Person said:
... when a newly elected President who hadn't even bothered with intelligence briefings
Click to expand...
iLOL
There was no need to take briefings when they are a rehash of previous briefings.
So your objection is political bias speaking.


Mr Person said:
... rejects out of hand reports of possible election interference by a foreign power?
Click to expand...
When there is no proof what do you think should be done?


Mr Person said:
Of course, I do find it bitterly hilarious how the left is being criticized for "suppositions" and "running with the hacking as a crime equivalent to Watergate" in the millionth thread about Hillary's private ****ing email server. That has to be the most overblown story of the century and the right is still clinging to it like it's the biggest news in town.
Click to expand...
Apparently you missed the part about this being a new release of information and a prior New Jersey Superior Court Judge saying this "is a smoking gun if ever there was one".
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Trump is endangering national security by refusing to commit to intel briefings,
Click to expand...
I have to disagree with this.
If there is new information sure, but as it was, no.
There is no reason to get a rehash of what you were already given.
 
Excon said:
I have to disagree with this.
If there is new information sure, but as it was, no.
There is no reason to get a rehash of what you were already given.
Click to expand...

Again, you miss the point - American politicians are abusing and privatizing their power.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Again, you miss the point - American politicians are abusing and privatizing their power.
Click to expand...
No. Separate things.

You held out something to be true to make a point. That point falls apart when it is shown that what you held out to be true really isn't.

I am not saying is that you can not make you point in a different way.
 
Excon said:
No. Separate things.

You held out something to be true to make a point. That point falls apart when it is shown that what you held out to be true really isn't.

I am not saying is that you can not make you point in a different way.
Click to expand...

Is there supposed to be some sort of meaning to this incoherent rambling?
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Is there supposed to be some sort of meaning to this incoherent rambling?
Click to expand...
iLOL
Deflection.
Your point was false. There was no reason to attend briefings where the information is the same.
Thus what you chose to use it in support of falls apart.


Find a different way to make your overall point. Duh!
 
Excon said:
iLOL
Deflection.
Your point was false. There was no reason to attend briefings where the information is the same.
Thus what you chose to use it in support of falls apart.


Find a different way to make your overall point. Duh!
Click to expand...

Seeing how I was being unbiased, impartial and objective in my assessment of the overall direction our government has undertaken in the past 50 years, your blatant political hackery has been exposed and your argument is invalid.
 
Mr Person said:
And how, pray tell, did Hillary "sell out" America? Or are you asking me whether she would sell out America (whatever that means) if she had one?



I continue to think the email server issue was overblown. It was bad, but nothing like what the GOP played it up to be. (Nevermind that they only found out about it by going on a seven-investigation witch hunt designed to try to hurt her with Benghazi. It's not like the GOP decided that it was important to make sure our computers are really secure and discovered this in the course of that investigation.)



The FBI found she was careless but was just about as careless with sensitive info as the last 5 SoS's - a detail her biggest detractors find necessary to ignore - it's just that her carelessness played out over a private email server. It also said it had never charged someone in similar circumstances, that all cases in which they recommended charges involved aggravating factors.

Nobody has proved this false or even tried.

And unlike Trump, she at least made a show of apologizing and saying it was a stupid thing to do.




So no, I do not think that being negligent with emails indicates a desire to "sell out America", whatever that's supposed to mean. I do think Trump's history shows he is willing to sell anyone or anything out as long as it helps his image. Selling out America would not help his image, so no, I do not think he is plotting to do so. Then again, unlike many conservatives who speak about Hillary, I never suggested that Trump is actually evil.

I'm still pretty damn concerned that he thought it would be OK to ignore intelligence briefings and then, when confronted with reports of potential interference in our election, he thought it'd be fine to attack the intelligence agencies for reporting on this intelligence.

Nobody has any business defending him for that while criticizing Hillary over an email server.
Click to expand...

She was an acting SoS with an known insecure server. How much more of a sellout could that be?

and I don't give a rat's ass about the 'others' who were doing this or that. We're talking about Hillary.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Seeing how I was being unbiased, impartial and objective in my assessment of the overall direction our government has undertaken in the past 50 years, your blatant political hackery has been exposed and your argument is invalid.
Click to expand...
Wrong again.

Again.
Abbazorkzog said:
Trump is endangering national security by refusing to commit to intel briefings, ...
Click to expand...

No he is not, thus your overall point falls apart.
 
Excon said:
Wrong again.

Again.
​

No he is not, thus your overall point falls apart.
Click to expand...

I find this whole thing hilarious, seeing how it all started with you bullheadedly ignoring the entire post and going after the small part of the post criticizing Trump. It is even more hilarious because it wasn't even about Trump, and neither is this thread.

avHnbUZ.gif
 
Abbazorkzog said:
I find this whole thing hilarious, seeing how it all started with you bullheadedly ignoring the entire post and going after the small part of the post criticizing Trump. It is even more hilarious because it wasn't even about Trump, and neither is this thread.

http://i.imgur.com/avHnbUZ.gif?noredirect[img][/QUOTE]So you are triggered. Figures.

You also seem to be missing the point.
You made two claims used in an attempt to make a point.
That point fell apart because one of those claims was wrong.
In other words, your criticism of Trump in this regards was wrong. There is no reason to attend briefings where the information is the same.

So again ...
[INDENT][B]I am not saying that you can not make you point in a different way.[/B][/INDENT]
or
[INDENT][B]Find a different way to make your overall point.[/B][/INDENT]
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom