• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time for trumpsters to get on board

Russian China, North Korea, Iran. Everyone hacks us, not including our friends.

So you can be on board without conceding that anyone of these created false stories or altered vote totals that moved the needle away from "the anointed one".
 
Like we don't have enough threads on this topic already...:roll:
 
Trump has accepted the intel blaming Russia for the hack. trumpsters now need to change their tune.

Aide says Trump 'accepts' U.S. intel blaming Russia for hack
How many threads do we need on this stupid bs?



This is specifically what Reince Priebus said.


"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday."


"Entities in Russia" is not the same as the Russian Government.
 
How many threads do we need on this stupid bs?



This is specifically what Reince Priebus said.


"He accepts the fact that this particular case was entities in Russia so that's not the issue," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday."


"Entities in Russia" is not the same as the Russian Government.


in the case of russia it certainly is.
 
a non sequitur

"2016 would be the third case of meddling by Moscow in a U.S. election: the Soviets intervened against Harry Truman in 1948 and Ronald Reagan in 1984, though both of those presidents won re-election anyway."
U.S. and Russian election meddling is surprisingly common.

Russia's influence has never tipped an election in the US, but tell me how outraged you were when they tried to get Reagan defeated in '84 :lamo
 
Did the Russian's reveal information about Clinton that should have already been made public information?

The 'fake news' story ran its course, now its time to lament the real news that did in HRC's candidacy. And you're absolutely correct that most of the leaks were things that the American people should have been aware of.
 
Like we don't have enough threads on this topic already...:roll:

Let me know when it reaches the level of email or Benghazi threads.
 
Did the Russian's reveal information about Clinton that should have already been made public information?

Did the leaks actually contain information all that damaging to Hillary? It showed the DNC worked to tank Bernie, but despite all the phony liberal outrage, no emails to or from Hillary were actually released
 
What hypocrisy?

The hypocrisy that thread after thread about Clinton's email issues or Benghazi are ok but thread after thread on the hacks isn't.
 
The hypocrisy that thread after thread about Clinton's email issues or Benghazi are ok but thread after thread on the hacks isn't.

I didn't make such a claim.
 
Did the leaks actually contain information all that damaging to Hillary? It showed the DNC worked to tank Bernie, but despite all the phony liberal outrage, no emails to or from Hillary were actually released

Hillary Clinton is the embodiment of the DNC.
 
Back
Top Bottom