• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

And, you were worried about private servers....

Private security and intel for a nation's leader. What could possibly go wrong?

hitler-given-salute-from-waffen-ss-guard.jpg
 
And thank you to the Lefties who still don't get it. May they be forever dumb.

At this point, amazing as it is, those on the Left are the only people who actually understand what is happening. THe Right has lost it mind.
 
So can you explain it?

EDIT -- oh, nevermind. I see that you think Trump is Hitler. :roll:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzstaffel
The Schutzstaffel (SS; also stylized as Runic "ᛋᛋ" with Germanic runes; German pronunciation: [ˈʃʊtsˌʃtafəl] ( listen); literally "Protection Squadron")

I guess it's possible that you do not know. American education certainly has enough holes in it that something like this flies under the radar of most.
 
Private security and intel for a nation's leader. What could possibly go wrong?

hitler-given-salute-from-waffen-ss-guard.jpg

That's a bit hyperbolic, don't you think?

This could just mean that President-Elect Trump wants to keep a few guys he's worked with gainfully employed while he's president.

Frankly, unless he massively beefs up this security force and starts using it to bully, torture, detain, terrorize, or otherwise silence minorities and political dissidents, the comparison is not appropriate.
 
At this point, amazing as it is, those on the Left are the only people who actually understand what is happening. THe Right has lost it mind.

Yeah, it's amazing all right.
 
Godwin by post one.

Comparing private personal security to the SS is beyond ridiculous. As is comparing this to an email server.

This is the Godwin presidency, in more ways than one.
 
Hmm... i read it twice, but i must have still missed the part where you apologized for 8 years of "I hate Obama!"

When I criticized Pres. Obama, it was based on what he DID, not what I thought that he might do. I didn't start complaining about his first cabinet position going to a lobbyist until after the nomination was made and confirmed. What you and the rest of the TDS crowd are doing is jumping to conclusions based on your hate and NOTHING. What you are doing is just creating drama ....That's it!! My new name for the lot of you: The Anti-Trump Drama Queen League - the ATDQL. Thanks for the inspiration!
 
He is yet again proving himself to be a flaming idiot.

Who would control what and which and where and when? Ain't no seamless combination of private and government security. It wouldn't work. There is no way in hell the SS is going to negotiate with and/or be under the command of a non-governmental presidential security force. It doesn't work that way and it can't work that way. The entire idea illustrates how goddam clueless Trump is.

Lots of things Trump does are out-of-the-ordinary. There's more than one way to run security.

The SS can be the perimeter security and Trump's own can be the bodyguards they've always been.
 
It's "buffoon."


So, Hillary not trusting government servers is bad, but Trump not trusting the Secret Service and CIA is good. Got it.


I have never before understood why we are in such decline. But, thanks for providing me a solid clue.

What Hillary was doing is illegal.

Otherwise this thread is just for drama purposes.
 
Trump is rewriting all the rules.

Trump private security force ‘playing with fire’ - POLITICO





Thanks, Righties. We really appreciate you all voting this buffoon into office.

I think the left made it almost impossible to vote for anyone else. Just saying.
Now lets put that aside for a minute. How much access to vital secrete information will they have? I mean, Clinton left the door wide open. Right?
It is ok to call the man a buffoon though. Clown is pretty darn good as well. But that doesn't negate the fact that he has been elected simply because the alternative was puke worthy.
If he is going against the rules, lets discuss that. What rules, exactly, did he break yet?
 
At this point, amazing as it is, those on the Left are the only people who actually understand what is happening. THe Right has lost it mind.

What is happening? Be specific.
 
The way the Libbos are losing their minds, I don't blame President Trump for adding an extra layer to his security perimeter.

The meltdown has been EPIC...payn_c14729220161222120100.jpg
 
What is happening? Be specific.

Rapidly flipping our established social order on its head. Refusing to release tax returns, midnight tweeting, open conflict with the media, nepotism...all huge no-noes flying in the face of how presidents should act. And, you people cheer it on like it's a good thing.
 
No, I a concerned about the President using private security. And, that is a huge issue. Much more so than Hillary using a private server, which drove the Right Wingnuts into a lather for several years.

Why is Trump using private security a big deal?
Why would it be more of a big deal than Clinton using a unsecured private server for classified info?
 
Rapidly flipping our established social order on its head. Refusing to release tax returns, midnight tweeting, open conflict with the media, nepotism...all huge no-noes flying in the face of how presidents should act. And, you people cheer it on like it's a good thing.

Where have I cheered for Trump. I just asked a simple question , which you replied with a rant. Unless you can point out where I have "cheer it on like it's a good thing", your opinion is baseless. Seems you don't like to asked to explain your statements.

I can agree the "tweets" are unusual for a politician to do. Just maybe or current social order needs to be turned on its head.
 
Where have I cheered for Trump. I just asked a simple question , which you replied with a rant. Unless you can point out where I have "cheer it on like it's a good thing", your opinion is baseless. Seems you don't like to asked to explain your statements.

I can agree the "tweets" are unusual for a politician to do. Just maybe or current social order needs to be turned on its head.

"You people" applies to all those who claim to be conservative but are giddily cheering this radical regime. If you do not qualify, then you have no need to whine.
 
Back
Top Bottom