• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Sounding Like Republicans?

truthatallcost

truthatallcost

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
26,719
Reaction score
6,278
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Republicans circa October - "This election is rigged!"
Democrats circa Present- "The election was rigged!"

Republicans circa 2012- "Thanks Obama."
Democrats circa present- "Thanks Putin."

Republicans circa 1992- "The Chinese helped put Bill Clinton in office!"
Democrats circa Present- "The Russians helped put Donald Trump in office!"

Republicans circa 1980 to present- "We need to get to the bottom of this rampant voter fraud!"
Democrats after 2016 Presidential Election- "There was rampant voter fraud! Gasp!"

Republicans circa 1990s- "Outsourcing is good"
Democrats circa present- "Manufacturing jobs are never coming back, who cares?"

Republicans circa 2003- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
Democrats circa 2016- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
--------------------------------------
You Democrats are becoming your parents :2razz:
 
truthatallcost said:
Republicans circa October - "This election is rigged!"
Democrats circa Present- "The election was rigged!"

Republicans circa 2012- "Thanks Obama."
Democrats circa present- "Thanks Putin."

Republicans circa 1992- "The Chinese helped put Bill Clinton in office!"
Democrats circa Present- "The Russians helped put Donald Trump in office!"

Republicans circa 1980 to present- "We need to get to the bottom of this rampant voter fraud!"
Democrats after 2016 Presidential Election- "There was rampant voter fraud! Gasp!"

Republicans circa 1990s- "Outsourcing is good"
Democrats circa present- "Manufacturing jobs are never coming back, who cares?"

Republicans circa 2003- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
Democrats circa 2016- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
--------------------------------------
You Democrats are becoming your parents :2razz:
Click to expand...

I read someone say today that lots of people on the left have decided to act out their fantasies on how Trump is, figuring if the tactics worked for a buffoon like him they will be all net for them cause they are so awesomely brilliant of course. They are going to give those who dont agree with them a dose of our own medicine...lots of aggression and lies.
 
truthatallcost said:
Republicans circa October - "This election is rigged!"
Democrats circa Present- "The election was rigged!"

Republicans circa 2012- "Thanks Obama."
Democrats circa present- "Thanks Putin."

Republicans circa 1992- "The Chinese helped put Bill Clinton in office!"
Democrats circa Present- "The Russians helped put Donald Trump in office!"

Republicans circa 1980 to present- "We need to get to the bottom of this rampant voter fraud!"
Democrats after 2016 Presidential Election- "There was rampant voter fraud! Gasp!"

Republicans circa 1990s- "Outsourcing is good"
Democrats circa present- "Manufacturing jobs are never coming back, who cares?"

Republicans circa 2003- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
Democrats circa 2016- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
--------------------------------------
You Democrats are becoming your parents :2razz:
Click to expand...

:lol:

So does that mean Republicans are now sounding more like Democrats? :2razz:
 
One thing that both sides agree upon...we're a divided country.
 
truthatallcost said:
Republicans circa October - "This election is rigged!"
Democrats circa Present- "The election was rigged!"

Republicans circa 2012- "Thanks Obama."
Democrats circa present- "Thanks Putin."

Republicans circa 1992- "The Chinese helped put Bill Clinton in office!"
Democrats circa Present- "The Russians helped put Donald Trump in office!"

Republicans circa 1980 to present- "We need to get to the bottom of this rampant voter fraud!"
Democrats after 2016 Presidential Election- "There was rampant voter fraud! Gasp!"

Republicans circa 1990s- "Outsourcing is good"
Democrats circa present- "Manufacturing jobs are never coming back, who cares?"

Republicans circa 2003- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
Democrats circa 2016- "The war in Afghanistan is a good thing."
--------------------------------------
You Democrats are becoming your parents :2razz:
Click to expand...

I've known for many years that there are no meaningful differences between Dems and Repubs. Words are cheap, but the record is quite clear. Most of this country's problems are the result of bipartisan malfeasance and bipartisan unconstitutional governance.
 
Thoreau72 said:
I've known for many years that there are no meaningful differences between Dems and Repubs. Words are cheap, but the record is quite clear. Most of this country's problems are the result of bipartisan malfeasance and bipartisan unconstitutional governance.
Click to expand...
I totally disagree.

We have experienced a moving outward from the center, a political centrifugal force acting upon Democrats with they becoming the liberal party and the Republicans the Conservative party. We are a culturally divided nation that, as the unwarranted protesting and rioting against a duly and fairly [ at least on the Republican side, there was an awful lot of underhandedness exposed from the left ] President elect exposes.
 
Master PO said:
thats what happens when the constitution is not strictly adhered to
Click to expand...

No, it happens when the bulk of the general public are this gullible:

Fake news headlines fool American adults about 75% of the time, according to a large-scale new survey conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for BuzzFeed News.

The survey also found that people who cite Facebook as a major source of news are more likely to view fake news headlines as accurate than those who rely less on the platform for news.

The new data comes from an online survey of 3,015 US adults conducted between Nov. 28 and Dec. 1. For more on the methodology, see the bottom of this article. A detailed summary of results to all questions can be found here. Additional calculations can be found here.

link...​
 
poweRob said:
No, it happens when the bulk of the general public are this gullible:
Fake news headlines fool American adults about 75% of the time, according to a large-scale new survey conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for BuzzFeed News.

The survey also found that people who cite Facebook as a major source of news are more likely to view fake news headlines as accurate than those who rely less on the platform for news.

The new data comes from an online survey of 3,015 US adults conducted between Nov. 28 and Dec. 1. For more on the methodology, see the bottom of this article. A detailed summary of results to all questions can be found here. Additional calculations can be found here.

link...​
Click to expand...

and you i suppose exclude yourself?

when you flow the constitution to the letter, then no one can complain
 
Master PO said:
and you i suppose exclude yourself?
Click to expand...

I wasn't a dupe for any of it so, I don't include myself. I also don't do facebook which probably helped.

Master PO said:
when you flow the constitution to the letter, then no one can complain
Click to expand...

Pretty fluff talk that means pretty much nothing. I suppose you'd like to abolish the judicial branch. Because why would we need them if the constitution is to be followed to your letter and there is no interpretations of what those letters mean at all?
 
poweRob said:
I wasn't a dupe for any of it so, I don't include myself. I also don't do facebook which probably helped.



Pretty fluff talk that means pretty much nothing. I suppose you'd like to abolish the judicial branch. Because why would we need them if the constitution is to be followed to your letter and there is no interpretations of what those letters mean at all?
Click to expand...


and here we go, "i smarter then everyone else", kind of thing.

seeing that the the judicial branch is part of our federal structure of government, i don't see abolishing.

as to following to the my letter my words, No, i use the founders own words on government not my own and never have, because the only way of the constitution is to read what they say about it , and not 20th century men.
 
Master PO said:
and here we go, "i smarter then everyone else", kind of thing.
Click to expand...

Are you feeling insecure or something? Because you seem to be conceding you were duped by fake news here.

Master PO said:
seeing that the the judicial branch is part of our federal structure of government, i don't see abolishing.
Click to expand...

There'd be absolutely no need for it if there is no interpretation of the constitution.

Master PO said:
as to following to the my letter my words, No, i use the founders own words on government not my own and never have, because the only way of the constitution is to read what they say about it , and not 20th century men.
Click to expand...

Under whose interpretation of their words then?
 
poweRob said:
Are you feeling insecure or something? Because you seem to be conceding you were duped by fake news here.

iam just lauging because people always think they are smarter then everyone else, it never fails



There'd be absolutely no need for it if there is no interpretation of the constitution.

to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Under whose interpretation of their words then?
Click to expand...
only one true source ..the federalist.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom