• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Apparently, being black is a choice

rocket88

Mod Conspiracy Theorist
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
44,814
Reaction score
20,221
Location
A very blue state
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
FB_IMG_1480180236623.jpg

Wait, when did being black become a choice? I guess you can now get black conversion therapy.
 
Orange is the new Black and you can't make fun of Trump's complexion otherwise it's racist.

I think being orange is a choice. Nobody made him use a bad spray tan.
 
Oh you didnt know?

2B7E6B1700000578-3203522-Shaun_King_above_an_author_and_writer_who_is_one_of_the_leading_-m-57_1.jpgrachel_dolezal8.jpg

Apparently you can be born anything you like.

Obviously the person that wrote the poster confused the for black, instead of bisexual. But come on...considering the fact that men can decide they are women and people can decide they are lizards...thats a pretty minor mistake.

crossdresser.jpgmaxresdefault (1).jpg
 
Why would they add black when the rest of the picture has to do with LGBT? I'm with Simon on calling bull****.
 
How does anyone choose what they'll be born as?
 
Where the hell did that come from?

That was my question. It's incredibly stupid, but it's verging on "poe" levels of incredibly stupid. Without an actual source it's hard to say if it's legit or just someone taking the piss.

If I was a betting man, I'd say this is a "fake news strikes again" type of situation.
 
That was my question. It's incredibly stupid, but it's verging on "poe" levels of incredibly stupid. Without an actual source it's hard to say if it's legit or just someone taking the piss.

If I was a betting man, I'd say this is a "fake news strikes again" type of situation.

Sorry man, photos don't lie.
 
Sorry man, photos don't lie.

I can't....I can't figure out if this is sarcastic or not? It's sarcastic right? Like "I saw it on the internet"?

(between this election season and the fact sarcasm is sometimes hard online, I feel like I actually have to ask this)
 
I can't....I can't figure out if this is sarcastic or not? It's sarcastic right? Like "I saw it on the internet"?

(between this election season and the fact sarcasm is sometimes hard online, I feel like I actually have to ask this)

Yes, that was sarcasm. At least a third of my job is photoshop, and I could have photoshopped that in .00000000001 seconds.
 
Devout Christians who refuse to celebrate homosexual conduct and believe it is wrong infuriate many homosexuals. Apparently some of them strike back by trying to portray those Christians in a false light, which is a type of defamation.
 
Devout Christians who refuse to celebrate homosexual conduct and believe it is wrong infuriate many homosexuals. Apparently some of them strike back by trying to portray those Christians in a false light, which is a type of defamation.

Right, this whole thing is just meant to hurt your feelings. Do you need a safe space?
 
Rachel Dolezal? Shaun King?

Yeah, that's a pretty stupid poster but no matter how stupid the idea there will be those who validate it.

How did I know someone would bring up Dolezal...you guys are getting awfully predictable.
 
Right, this whole thing is just meant to hurt your feelings. Do you need a safe space?

You seem to have an active imagination. My comments did not concern my own feelings, but rather the apparent anger of some homosexuals at devout Christians who refuse to endorse homosexual conduct. I think it's clear the sign that was shown is a forgery designed to portray those Christians in a false light.
 
You seem to have an active imagination. My comments did not concern my own feelings, but rather the apparent anger of some homosexuals at devout Christians who refuse to endorse homosexual conduct. I think it's clear the sign that was shown is a forgery designed to portray those Christians in a false light.

So in other words it's exactly as I said. You think the whole thing was made up to hurt your feelings.
 
Yes, that was sarcasm. At least a third of my job is photoshop, and I could have photoshopped that in .00000000001 seconds.

And given that it's on the web, there's a fairly good chance that the whole thing was created in Photoshop.

As much as we'd like to believe that nobody is that stupid, people have proven time and again that somebody is.
 
And given that it's on the web, there's a fairly good chance that the whole thing was created in Photoshop.

So why are getting so huffy about someone else suggesting it's a fake? Obviously you posted it to cast some stones and clearly not be all, "look at this funny fake thing". At least own it.
 
Back
Top Bottom