• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Trump Really Wants To "Drain The Swamp," Here's His Chance To Get Started

TheHammer

TheHammer

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,522
Reaction score
334
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
If you want to know the definition of BIG government, just look at the number of civilian employee appointments Trump will be making. The number under the Obama administration hit 3,700. Deputies, deputies for deputies, ass kissers, hanger ons, and every other blob with connections with somebody in government.


OK, if Trump really wants to begin “draining the swamp,” he has a perfect chance, just by beginning with chopping the swamp of Presidential appointees. Does anybody here really believe that many Presidential appointees are doing necessary, important jobs? Is watching porno on the net all day really an important government job?
 
TheHammer said:
If you want to know the definition of BIG government, just look at the number of civilian employee appointments Trump will be making. The number under the Obama administration hit 3,700. Deputies, deputies for deputies, ass kissers, hanger ons, and every other blob with connections with somebody in government.


OK, if Trump really wants to begin “draining the swamp,” he has a perfect chance, just by beginning with chopping the swamp of Presidential appointees. Does anybody here really believe that many Presidential appointees are doing necessary, important jobs? Is watching porno on the net all day really an important government job?
Click to expand...

Not only should many of these "leader" appointments be skipped but those under them terminated and the department, agency or program should be eliminated. For example, education is not a constitutional federal power - poof, the federal education department is gone, we just saved over $70 billion annually. Eliminte TSA (federal airport nannies) and save over $7 billiion more annually.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Not only should many of these "leader" appointments be skipped but those under them terminated and the department, agency or program should be eliminated. For example, education is not a constitutional federal power - poof, the federal education department is gone, we just saved over $70 billion annually. Eliminte TSA (federal airport nannies) and save over $7 billiion more annually.
Click to expand...

We shall see just how serious Trump is about draining the swamp. I'll start believing it when I start seeing it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom