• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

10 Things Trump Just Made Cool Again

Harshaw

Harshaw

Filmmaker ● Lawyer ● Patriot
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
38,750
Reaction score
13,845
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Donald Trump Just Made So Many Old Things Cool Again

Whether Trump will succeed in enacting policies that increase the standards of living for Americans is obviously yet to be seen. But judging by the response to his election victory, we know for a fact that he’s going to make a whole bunch of stuff cool again — stuff that hasn’t been cool since 2008.

Here are ten things that were really awesome between 2001 and 2008, and then became racist and/or treasonous in 2009, that instantly became cool again on November 8, 2016.
Click to expand...

All of this is going to be an endless well.

I'm especially looking forward to #4, War Protests. Where all y'all been, guys?
 
Just one minor question, add the number of days seats were left vacant in the Supreme Court, and the First Circuit, by the Dems, and how many by Republicans.

Then get back to me.

You won't, and this is a guessestimate, but I'd say the ratio is something over 100 to 1. Just roughly, but you get the idea.

You didn't know that, you have no idea at all what it means.

Oh well.
 
late said:
Just one minor question, add the number of days seats were left vacant in the Supreme Court, and the First Circuit, by the Dems, and how many by Republicans.

Then get back to me.

You won't, and this is a guessestimate, but I'd say the ratio is something over 100 to 1. Just roughly, but you get the idea.

You didn't know that, you have no idea at all what it means.

Oh well.
Click to expand...

Ummm . . . cool story, bro.
 
Yeah, that article was blistering.



My blisters have blisters.



Too bad liberals won't read it, because, you know.


The source.
 
Harshaw said:
Ummm . . . cool story, bro.
Click to expand...

I know that I can count on here not knowing what they're talking about, carefully avoid learning, and are expert at saying nothing.
 
late said:
I know that I can count on here not knowing what they're talking about, carefully avoid learning, and are expert at saying nothing.
Click to expand...

As an exhibit of saying nothing, I give you post #2 of this thread.
 
Fun, if one-sided, article. I'm looking forward to hearing that "questioning the president is unpatriotic" from the right again.
 
Cameron said:
Fun, if one-sided, article. I'm looking forward to hearing that "questioning the president is unpatriotic" from the right again.
Click to expand...

It cuts both ways.
 
They should have added

Making fun of disabled people

Disrespecting veterans

among a few
 
Beaudreaux said:
I'm getting a headache because I'm laughing so hard. Case in point:

6) Investigative Journalism

Thanks to Donald Trump, investigative journalism just went from totally unnecessary to vital. [...]
Click to expand...

Yes, investigative journalism as it existed 2009-present:

Obama: "Not a SMIDGEN of corruption."

IJs: Meh. Good enough for me.
 
late said:
Just one minor question, add the number of days seats were left vacant in the Supreme Court, and the First Circuit, by the Dems, and how many by Republicans.

Then get back to me.

You won't, and this is a guessestimate, but I'd say the ratio is something over 100 to 1. Just roughly, but you get the idea.

You didn't know that, you have no idea at all what it means.

Oh well.
Click to expand...

Harshaw said:
Ummm . . . cool story, bro.
Click to expand...

Uh, yeah... wtf are you talking about, LATE?
 
KevinKohler said:
Yeah, that article was blistering.



My blisters have blisters.



Too bad liberals won't read it, because, you know.


The source.
Click to expand...

I read it and most meant nothing, jokes about the President? really. The rest sounded like the ramblings of a typical trumbot that believes he is the second coming, so much disappointment to come for so many bots. Have fun, while you can.
 
Casper said:
I read it and most meant nothing, jokes about the President? really. The rest sounded like the ramblings of a typical trumbot that believes he is the second coming, so much disappointment to come for so many bots. Have fun, while you can.
Click to expand...

So....you read it, but you missed the point?
 
Casper said:
I read it and most meant nothing, jokes about the President? really. The rest sounded like the ramblings of a typical trumbot that believes he is the second coming, so much disappointment to come for so many bots. Have fun, while you can.
Click to expand...

If that's what you came away with, then you didn't read it, and Sean Davis was NeverTrump.
 
Harshaw said:
Donald Trump Just Made So Many Old Things Cool Again



All of this is going to be an endless well.

I'm especially looking forward to #4, War Protests. Where all y'all been, guys?
Click to expand...

I'm looking forward to #6, Investigative Journalism. Before, there was nothing to investigate, but now this will be essential. :mrgreen:

From your link:

The illegal arms trafficking to violent Mexican drug cartels conceived and executed by the Obama administration? Not a scandal. Illegally using the Internal Revenue Service to target and prosecute the administration’s political enemies for the capital crime of opposing Obama’s agenda? Not a scandal. Ignoring repeated requests for beefed-up security at the American mission in Libya, then blaming the orchestrated and coordinated terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11 on a random filmmaker? Not a scandal.

Multiple cabinet secretaries using secret, private e-mail addresses and servers to avoid federal open records laws? Not a scandal. And when a presidential administration so obviously has no scandals and therefore nothing whatsoever to investigate, why would anybody need to waste any time investigating anything?

:lamo
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Uh, yeah... wtf are you talking about, LATE?
Click to expand...

The decline and fall of representative government.

I might explain it later, it being late, but at this late date; I may simply let events unfold into a teachable moment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom