• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Seriously

How you embarrass yourself. The either/or fallacy is one of the super-easy ones.

Even easier is putting no thought into anything at all and then congratulating yourself on how clever you are for standing on the sideline and hooting.
 
I realize this is the attitude a lot of Sanders supporters had about seeing Trump getting elected: that he'd crash everything down and out of the rubble a glorious rebirth will occur. It's a fantasy. Nothing good is ever born out of political rubble.

I don't know about Sanders supporters, I first supported Jim Webb and then John Kasich. The part I posted about sticking cotton in your ears and just watch how the two parties govern was told to me by Ross Perot. I found out he was right. I'm not sure if you think Trump is going to cause the political rubble or not. I do think any president's hands are tied to a certain extent on what he can and can't do. Usually divided government will stop most of the outrageous stuff or stuff that is purely political agenda without the backing of the people. Obama with his pen and phone found a way around that for a lot of things. So divided government didn't stop nearly as much as it had for previous presidents.

But by using a pen and a phone, Trump can cancel a lot of the stuff Obama bypassed congress with his own pen. Ironically, but refusing to make the Iran deal a treaty and just an agreement between president and Iran, Trump can throw it out the window if he so chooses. What happens will be interesting. But I don't expect rubble.
 
I'll blame liberals for all the damage they do because they do lots of damage, broseph.

For all of us, "dude." But you're one of those we can rely on to blame dems and liberals pretty soon for the all damage Trump does. Because that's what you lot do.
 
You're the one calling all of them racists, not I. But if you can deny your own lying eyes that saw the types of scum who showed up inside Trump's rallies for the past 3 months (at least) by all means keep doing it.

You don't read your own posts, apparently. It was you who said Trump "got in by appealing to racists and neo-nazis" and Trump won by appealing to democrats in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. So yeah, you called those democrats racists. The great thing about the trump victory is a rather unexpected one--angry, fringe, hate-filled, race arsonists like you are being exposed and marginalized. Now put down your computer and go back out there and throw rocks at cops.
 
And yet you got a corrupt, dishonest, and ignorant criminal who got in by appealing to racists and neo-nazis now. You're absolutely right about not being a winner. There are no winners from this. Well done.


Man, your hatred really runs DEEP... and please, do everyone a favor and give that dishonest, worn out race card tactic a rest. Unless your goal is to make everyone see you as one of those progressives that resorts to dishonest and immature name calling when someone expresses an opinion you don't like. If that's the case, then by all means carry on... you're doing a fine job.
 
Back
Top Bottom