• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What a pathological liar The Scumbag Known As Trump is

volsrock said:
ZERO? LOL

Obama admin. knew millions could not keep their health insurance

President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.


Obama admin. knew millions could not keep their health insurance - NBC News
Click to expand...


How many millions didn't have coverage to "not keep" before the ACA?
 
braindrain said:
You giving anyone crap for being a part loyalist is rather funny. You are the one of the biggest political hacks on this site.
Click to expand...

Phony "independents" are always good for a laugh if nothing else (and it is always nothing but).
 
Excon said:
iLOL
Your comment is as foolish as it is wrong.
Pointing out that what you said applies to Obama does not make a person a Trump loyalist, though what you said, being against Trump, may make you a Hillary loyalist.
Click to expand...

One of the many things about people like you that continually amaze is that you think we can't see right through you when you're more transparent, though less substantial, than air.
 
MickeyW said:
The Left wing is exactly what you just said, twisted, upside-down, inside-out.........and Fools All!



Yes indeed they do, to wit: the Clintons, Pisslosi, Reid, obama, Moochelle, Donna Brazille, and one of the biggest sleazebags of all... "Debbie" Wasserman Schultz. ;) HELLO POT!



Always and Forever!



Stellar my man....just stellar. :applaud:applaud

The words of liberals, making fools out of liberals ........everywhere!
Click to expand...

You learned your "debating" techniques from the tRump handbook. Well, it's not really a book, it's a page. And it's not a full page is just the following: "Nyaaaaaah nyaaaaaaahhhh." Cellar, my "man." Cellar.
 
Fenton said:
[/B]

:lamo

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998


"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999


"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." "
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002


"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction. It has refused to take those steps. That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict."
-- Sen. Harry Reid (D. NV) Oct. 9, 2002


"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
[ Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)
Click to expand...

You still using that tattered, threadbare, worn-out, weak-sister BS? Of course you are. You're a dedicated worshiper of failure and disaster.
 
digitusmedius said:
Yeah, just look at the supporters comment he gets here. They actually love the lying and the more of them and more blatant, the better. The entire tRump support depends on the lies. It's the mother's milk of the rightwing. Without lies they couldn't function.
Click to expand...

Please review Hillarys first statement/press conference after the issue of her private server emerged, then review the liberal sales pitch for Obamacare--you remember: you can keep your doctor, keep your plan, save $2500, they even named it the Affordable Care Act for Christs sake, then tell me which candidate/party cant function without lies.
 
I have received gigs from the mods for lesser things than some people are throwing out there in this thread. :lamo
 
jimbo said:
Then, Glen, you are stating that Obama is too dumb to do the job. Everybody else knew. And we all heard about it at exactly the same time that he did. Over CBS news. Do you really believe that?

I find interesting your last paragraph. That lying is tossed about waaay too often, while you are tossing lying about waaay too often.
Click to expand...

I love it when you lot start using sources you normally tell us lie all the time. Makes for good farce. I guess the PPACA should have had a provision that forbade insurance companies from dropping policies. I sure think it should have. In fact, It really should have made private health insurance companies irrelevant and obsolete or, at most, only operating in the secondary market. Every flaw attributable to ObamaCare can be directly connected to the fact that it left private health ins. cartel with too much power. Again, I have to point out that the only people making a big stink about this issue are those who don't use ObamaCare and who are not affected in the least by it. Seems like ObamaCare is pretty popular with the millions of people for whom it was intended to help.
 
Last edited:
digitusmedius said:
Aint it amazin' that the people who claim truth to be so important to them always choose to support the biggest liars in the country?
Click to expand...

And those who don't hold truth as a virtue at all (like you) selected Hillary. Perhaps you have missed the polls that list both candidates roughly equal in the eyes of the public in lacking honesty and trustworthiness. Its the hacks on each side that only see it in the character of the opposition. MIght be time to pull your head out of the partisan sand.
 
Fletch said:
And those who don't hold truth as a virtue at all (like you) selected Hillary.
Click to expand...
That's the sort of bizarre confabulation that makes places like this so much fun.
Perhaps you have missed the polls that list both candidates roughly equal in the eyes of the public in lacking honesty and trustworthiness.
Click to expand...
"Roughly equal?" Oh, yeah. I always have to allow for rightwing arithmetic. So, of course, you back the one that comes in a distant second. Thank you for admitting that.
Its the hacks on each side that only see it in the character of the opposition. MIght be time to pull your head out of the partisan sand.
Click to expand...
I see there must have been a meme meeting of highly partisan rightwingers who are now just throwing the word "hack" out as often as possible hoping their hackery will go unnoticed. But that's how people who depend on projection hope it works. But it doesn't work. It just makes the people using it look pathetic and bereft of anything intelligent to say. It's basically the tRump tactic we saw in the debates: "Nuh-uh, YOU are!!!!"
 
digitusmedius said:
You still using that tattered, threadbare, worn-out, weak-sister BS? Of course you are. You're a dedicated worshiper of failure and disaster.
Click to expand...

Yes, Im still making you look like a spluttering, spastic, unstable mess.

Lol....Ive never seen literary hyperventilation like that
 
volsrock said:
Obama you can keep your Dr...his crowd immediately believed what he said and took it as Gospel.


Obama Obamacare will save u 2500.00 a year,,,his crowd immediately believed what he said and took it as Gospel.
Click to expand...

MickeyW said:
:applaud:applaud
Click to expand...

Oh well Obama said that thing so Trump is now telling the truth!
 
digitusmedius said:


Donald, you're such a horrible POS that being a disgrace would be a major upgrade for you.
Click to expand...


Even I have to say Trump was a lie. (I am assuming Trump was talking about that particular incident?)
 
MickeyW said:
Click to expand...

I see your problem! You should probably try talking to a liberal rather than a wall.





That Barney quip about speaking to a dining room table wasn't actually a suggestion.......
 
digitusmedius said:
That's the sort of bizarre confabulation that makes places like this so much fun.
Click to expand...
Translation: You have no argument. Its one thing to support Hillary because you support liberals and liberal policies or that you cant stand the possibility of a Trump presidency. But for a Hillary supporter to denounce anyone for their dishonesty is laughable.
"Roughly equal?" Oh, yeah. I always have to allow for rightwing arithmetic. So, of course, you back the one that comes in a distant second. Thank you for admitting that.
Click to expand...
Polls show 64% find Hillary to not be honest and trustworthy. Trumps numbers aren't much better. He is at 60%. I am not sure why that sort of math is difficult for you, but it shouldn't be.
I see there must have been a meme meeting of highly partisan rightwingers who are now just throwing the word "hack" out as often as possible hoping their hackery will go unnoticed. But that's how people who depend on projection hope it works. But it doesn't work. It just makes the people using it look pathetic and bereft of anything intelligent to say. It's basically the tRump tactic we saw in the debates: "Nuh-uh, YOU are!!!!"
Click to expand...
No. Some people are hacks. Sorry if my pointing that out offends you. Perhaps you should try harder to be objective....that was a joke. We both know that has zero chance of happening. But I think it is not only fair, but accurate, to say that a supporter of Hillary who denounces Trump for being dishonest, is a hack.
 
digitusmedius said:
Excon said:
iLOL
Your comment is as foolish as it is wrong.
Pointing out that what you said applies to Obama does not make a person a Trump loyalist, though what you said, being against Trump, may make you a Hillary loyalist.
Click to expand...
One of the many things about people like you that continually amaze is that you think we can't see right through you when you're more transparent, though less substantial, than air.
Click to expand...
The Hillary loyalist again shows they have no clue as to what they speak.
 
Fenton said:
Yes, Im still making you look like a spluttering, spastic, unstable mess.

Lol....Ive never seen literary hyperventilation like that
Click to expand...

My but aren't the tRumpsters getting nasty at the end of this. I wonder why.
 
Fletch said:
Translation: You have no argument. Its one thing to support Hillary because you support liberals and liberal policies or that you cant stand the possibility of a Trump presidency. But for a Hillary supporter to denounce anyone for their dishonesty is laughable. Polls show 64% find Hillary to not be honest and trustworthy. Trumps numbers aren't much better. He is at 60%. I am not sure why that sort of math is difficult for you, but it shouldn't be.No. Some people are hacks. Sorry if my pointing that out offends you. Perhaps you should try harder to be objective....that was a joke. We both know that has zero chance of happening. But I think it is not only fair, but accurate, to say that a supporter of Hillary who denounces Trump for being dishonest, is a hack.
Click to expand...

My but aren't the tRumpsters getting nasty at the end of this. I wonder why.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom