• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Secret Service: "Hillary is Dangerous, Abusive, and Paranoid."

Garydog said:
I'm saying none of that, I'm just wondering how it is you managed to slip yourself in between Mr. and Mrs. Eisenhower's bed sheets so that you know ALL of their personal foibles? Clearly we have people alleging to live on Hillary's wall like a common housefly....
Click to expand...


But the insinuations are clear, In my opinion you are attempting to discredit facts that are part of the OP. I and others are calling you on this as debate. To suggest this person wasn’t twisted with staff and protection details from her time in Arkansas until now is just silly. I’m unclear of your motives as a very new member, I guessing you think some as gullible and naive and may be impacted with your posts.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
He was when he was governor of New Mexico. So if this guy is so perfect why did he not try to be the party's candidate
Click to expand...

Probably the same reason I don't vote Republican...he's not a Republican. Why is that hard to understand?
 
Last edited:
Thoreau72 said:
She's come undone?

Was it The Who, or Who's Next?
Click to expand...

Undun was the Guess Who.

Who's Next was a 1971 album by the Who and maybe the greatest rock album of all time.
 
Ikari said:
I generally vote Libertarian and I like Johnson far better than any other candidate. I think of the field, he's the best for the job.
Click to expand...



A vote for Johnson is in reality a vote for HRC. Please, the ticket of Johnson&Weld is a joke at best. I get you want an out as a protest vote but what you will get is the corruption and cronyism hinted to in the OP with HRC.
 
Garydog said:
According to Trump, she's been responsible for all of government since 1979. So apparently she was! "Goddamnit, Hill-Dog, what took you so long getting the hostages out of Iran??"
Click to expand...

When you use words like "all", you get dismissed.
 
woodsman said:
But the insinuations are clear, In my opinion you are attempting to discredit facts that are part of the OP. I and others are calling you on this as debate. To suggest this person wasn’t twisted with staff and protection details from her time in Arkansas until now is just silly. I’m unclear of your motives as a very new member, I guessing you think some as gullible and naive and may be impacted with your posts.
Click to expand...


Sorry, I missed "facts" in the OP....try again?
 
jimbo said:
Per today's polls, it's just as likely we will get Trump because Hillary.
Click to expand...

Per 538, those are not nearly "just as likely" outcomes.
 
woodsman said:
A vote for Johnson is in reality a vote for HRC. Please, the ticket of Johnson&Weld is a joke at best. I get you want an out as a protest vote but what you will get is the corruption and cronyism hinted to in the OP with HRC.
Click to expand...

Like we'd get much different with Trump. Y'all want to make it seem like your pile of **** don't stink as much as the other guy's, but in the end it's still a pile of ****. And I don't support or reward those. So whatever you want to say. A vote.for third party is a vote.for X or Y. But I have enough pride in this Republic and faith in what it can be that I refuse to vote for a pile of **** as President.

Maybe when the rest of y'all catch up with this understanding, we'll stop being stuck with pile of **** candidates from the main Party.
 
Ikari said:
Like we'd get much different with Trump. Y'all want to make it seem like your pile of **** don't stink as much as the other guy's, but in the end it's still a pile of ****. And I don't support or reward those. So whatever you want to say. A vote.for third party is a vote.for X or Y. But I have enough pride in this Republic and faith in what it can be that I refuse to vote for a pile of **** as President.

Maybe when the rest of y'all catch up with this understanding, we'll stop being stuck with pile of **** candidates from the main Party.
Click to expand...

Maybe when Trump puts the stinking fish head in prison we will have something to start with, I’ll vote for that…
 
late said:
You don't get to be an effective Congressperson without self control.

reality, reality, wherefore art thou reality?
Click to expand...

What was Hillary effective at as a congressperson?
 
woodsman said:
HRC has a horrible reputation with staff and protection details going back to her time in the Arkansas Governors mansion. Even George Stephanopoulos and other inner circle staff have confirmed this.

Trump had it right she is a nasty person in more ways than one. I’m not sure if one of the leaked emails from Podesta is legit but it seems HRC has a nasty odor problem because she does not bathe ,its said she smells like boiled cabbage, urine and farts.
Click to expand...

I started reading up on HRC when Billy was running for his first term, I can absolutely say with confidence that this person is far worse than the few disparaging remarks made about her. I don’t causally use the word “evil” as a practice but she is definitely that.
Click to expand...

...And those are her good points.
 
BrewerBob said:
Not even an agent. He was a member of the uniformed division. Never part of the Protective detail.
Click to expand...

He was assigned to the residence, and guarded the oval office. What's your point? It's well known, going back to Clinton's stint as governor of Arkansas, that Hillary is a royal bitch. I believe Byrne.
 
Ontologuy said:
It's not at all surprising that Hillary is abusive and yells at her secret service personnel: they're nearly all men.

Hillary has a lot of hostility harbored for men due to her father's emotionally abusive treatment of her and her husband's abusive philandering.

It's not surprising that her website and speeches are laced with misandry "disguised" as feminism or pro-women.

So she acts out on the secret service personnel the contempt and resentment, the internalized rage, she harbors for her father and Bill.

And, of course, she acts it out on Putin, creating the scariest nuclear situation.

All things considered, this is is just another piece of evidence in the foundational reason we cannot elect her President: http://www.debatepolitics.com/general-political-discussion/260238-hillarys-potential-h-bomb-misdirection-against-dad-and-bill.html.
Click to expand...

I can't for the life of me figure out how people can think she is not the most dangerous choice for president.
 
jimbo said:
Per today's polls, it's just as likely we will get Trump because Hillary.
Click to expand...

What? RCP average still has her up 1.7 points. :mrgreen:
 
woodsman said:
Maybe when Trump puts the stinking fish head in prison we will have something to start with, I’ll vote for that…
Click to expand...

Bwaaahahahahahah

Even on the extremely off chance that Trump is elected, he'd never throw her in jail.
 
Zyphlin said:
Meh. The notion that Hillary was horrible to deal with for the Secret Service is something I've heard pretty much to a man when I've talked to ex-agents. But ultimately that's a bit irrelevant and EXTREMELY low on my list for cares when it comes to the presidency. The overwhelming majority of those within the SS are exemplary folks and will do their job and their duty regardless of who wins. This is a big shrug to me.
Click to expand...

It matters as it's part of the puzzle that shows how utterly phony she is. That she isn't the person she shows to the public.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom