• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

KKK Endorses Trump

CwI9SxIXYAQxgK3.jpg


tumblr_o3bxzeqa8X1qzsnxyo1_1280.jpg
 
Sometimes a pic is worth more than a ton of BS.

Trump went after the White Supremacists with the Birther movement, and he got them.

He's been keeping them happy for several years, Trump Jr is his guy for keeping them happy now.
 
What to know what I'm really shocked about? A bunch of self-proclaimed "conservatives" voting for a big government statist like Trump all because he told them he was going to "build a wall" and ban Muslims.

After the Trump fiasco, conservatives have lost all credibility.

I think you're missing something. Many people are voting for Trump to send a big FU to the political elite. I'm hoping he has a good showing. Doubt he'll win. But with a good showing, he will send a strong message to politics as usual. And it's definitely time for politics as usual to change.

I personally believe that HC and her cronies cannot be trusted. I think she was promised a run at the presidency for standing by her man when her husband was impeached. The idea of Bill Clinton in the White House again is repulsive. And the idea that HC will be our first woman president...with her false family values...is repugnant. Why? Because knowing her husband was a cockhound, she denied-denied-denied...blamed the victim and tried (quite successfully) to destroy her and and hubby's past dalliances. THAT instead of kicking his sorry ass to the curb.

Supporting Trump because of a wall? Hardly.
 
So far the papers endorsing Trump: The KKK's Crusader and the National Enquirer.

And people wonder why I think Trump supporters are idiots....

I was just watching CNN and a political scientist was being interviewed on the sociological breakdown of the electorate this year. In this interview two statements surprised me. Trump voters seem to be better educated than the average American and to earn more at $ 72.000 pa.
 
That's rather misleading.

Trump's campaign issued a statement to news outlets reading, "Mr. Trump and the campaign denounces hate in any form. This publication is repulsive and their views do not represent the tens of millions of Americans who are uniting behind our campaign."

Has Trump gone on TV and personally renounced any association with white-power morons?


Besides, IIRC, Hillary's campaign has issued many statements that go unbelieved. I imagine the campaign has issued hundreds of them, on the emails alone.
 
That's rather misleading.



Has Trump gone on TV and personally renounced any association with white-power morons?

I made a similar analogy yesterday, but I want you to think of Trump's campaign as Sauron's Mouth.

 
I think you're missing something. Many people are voting for Trump to send a big FU to the political elite. I'm hoping he has a good showing. Doubt he'll win. But with a good showing, he will send a strong message to politics as usual. And it's definitely time for politics as usual to change.

I personally believe that HC and her cronies cannot be trusted. I think she was promised a run at the presidency for standing by her man when her husband was impeached. The idea of Bill Clinton in the White House again is repulsive. And the idea that HC will be our first woman president...with her false family values...is repugnant. Why? Because knowing her husband was a cockhound, she denied-denied-denied...blamed the victim and tried (quite successfully) to destroy her and and hubby's past dalliances. THAT instead of kicking his sorry ass to the curb.

Supporting Trump because of a wall? Hardly.

So you managed to pass up more qualified candidates to stick it to the political elite? And your choice was a reality T.V. star with ZERO political experience, and a history of behaving like a big government liberal? Seriously? In the process you may have caused the GOP to implode in a massive way never seen before? And for what? you think the GOP establishment will allow Trump and his base to destroy them?

As for Bill in the white house again, meh, we had to deal with two Bush presidents, I think you can suck it up and deal with two Clinton presidencies.
 
I think you're missing something. Many people are voting for Trump to send a big FU to the political elite. I'm hoping he has a good showing. Doubt he'll win. But with a good showing, he will send a strong message to politics as usual. And it's definitely time for politics as usual to change.

I personally believe that HC and her cronies cannot be trusted. I think she was promised a run at the presidency for standing by her man when her husband was impeached. The idea of Bill Clinton in the White House again is repulsive. And the idea that HC will be our first woman president...with her false family values...is repugnant. Why? Because knowing her husband was a cockhound, she denied-denied-denied...blamed the victim and tried (quite successfully) to destroy her and and hubby's past dalliances. THAT instead of kicking his sorry ass to the curb.

Supporting Trump because of a wall? Hardly.

This might be one of the most astute comments I have seen on DP concerning this election yet.
 
We had a thread about this weeks ago. Nobody cares.

Your post trivialized the hate that Trump's campaign has stirred up, not to mention our nation's history of racial violence.
 
" How could anybody with a functioning brain cell possibly vote for _____________" .

How many families and friends have fought over that one this year? lol
 
Well I don't like Trump in any form, you don't really have any control over who endorses you.

That is normally true if 25 NewsPapers endorsed your candidate and out of 25, 1 was KKK and the other was men with baby lizard fetish magazine.

But if only out thousands of newspapers only 2 endorsed your next choice for POTUS and of 2 magazines, one is KKK, then you have to wonder what is it about your candidate that only attracts KKK endorsement.


Again don't be distracted by false equivalency, that right would say yes but ISIS also endorsed Hillary. Because the question is, is ISIS the only newspaper that endorsed or 1 of many....Context matters.


Diving Mullah
 
Back
Top Bottom