• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How Team Clinton Secretly Sees the World

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
In brief, she and her campaign regard the rest of us as stupid people with poor memories who can easily be fooled. And she's right.

The website Politifact jumped all over Rudy Giuliani earlier this year when he said, “Hillary Clinton is for open borders.” It spent about 700 words sifting the evidence and ended up rating the former New York City mayor’s claim “false.”

Now we know that Politifact blew its call because it lacked access to the most important datum — Hillary Clinton’s real view.

For that, it would’ve had to be present at one of her paid speeches at a major financial institution, in this case the Brazilian bank Banco Itau. In May 2013, Clinton told her audience at the bank, “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.”

[...]

A certain high-handedness and bad faith pervades the entire Clinton campaign. Hillary Clinton was perfectly comfortable with the globe-trotting financiers throwing six-figure speaking fees at her, but then had to turn around and shovel boob bait for Bubba at her party’s inflamed left-wing activists, who hate those very financiers and their views on trade, among many other things.

The Clinton campaign’s predicament was captured in microcosm by spokesman Brian Fallon. In September 2015, he worried about an op-ed attacking the Keystone Pipeline that, he noted, had already been extensively edited and re-edited.

Secretary of State Clinton had, reasonably enough, indicated she’d likely support the pipeline and now she was coming out against. Will her newly aggressive opposition, Fallon wondered, “be greeted cynically and perhaps as part of some manufactured attempt to project sincerity?”

Yeah, probably — like much of what she says and does.

How Team Hillary secretly sees the world | New York Post
 
In brief, she and her campaign regard the rest of us as stupid people with poor memories who can easily be fooled. And she's right.



How Team Hillary secretly sees the world | New York Post

*yawn*

Yet another example of y'all taking a phrase completely out of context. The obvious context of her statement was NOT about EU-style come-and-go-as-you-please immigration, but about FREE TRADE...something that, last I recall, is near and dear to the hearts of conservatives.
 
In brief, she and her campaign regard the rest of us as stupid people with poor memories who can easily be fooled. And she's right.



How Team Hillary secretly sees the world | New York Post

First, Politifact blew the call because it is a subjective Progressive Machine operation owned and operated by the Soro's/Knight backed Poynter Institute.

It will always lean left, and at times far left, as it's mandate is to add legitimacy to far left, progressive agenda's.

As to the primary topic of the thread, it's abundantly clear how Hillary Clinton, her inner circle of operatives, her MSM partners, and the noise machine paid to carry her water, views the general public.

Deplorable, irredeemable, are two words from Hillary Clinton's mouth that confirm her view.

Remember, she has also said she will have public policies that hide private policies because she claim the people can't handle what she has done, and likely plans to do.
 
*yawn*

Yet another example of y'all taking a phrase completely out of context. The obvious context of her statement was NOT about EU-style come-and-go-as-you-please immigration, but about FREE TRADE...something that, last I recall, is near and dear to the hearts of conservatives.
Assuming you are correct, then it's equally bad. Open trade is allowing other countries to rape our job markets.


Almost as if...they realize they can't get their people into this country, so, they'll just get this countries jobs to their people in their country. Our trade agreements tend to only really work one way, and benefits everyone but us.
 
*yawn*

Yet another example of y'all taking a phrase completely out of context. The obvious context of her statement was NOT about EU-style come-and-go-as-you-please immigration, but about FREE TRADE...something that, last I recall, is near and dear to the hearts of conservatives.

Her and her fellow Democrats have a serious problem expressing themselves.

It's always, "Well, this is what we really meant"

Lies are hard.
 
*yawn*

Yet another example of y'all taking a phrase completely out of context. The obvious context of her statement was NOT about EU-style come-and-go-as-you-please immigration, but about FREE TRADE...something that, last I recall, is near and dear to the hearts of conservatives.

Then why was the phrase she used "free trade AND open borders". You imply that "open borders" means nothing more than free trade.

You guys need to cut this out. You're in danger of breaking your backs trying to defend what Hillary says.
 
Back
Top Bottom