• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Lets Inner Thug Loose on Stage in Second Debate

I kinda feel that way trying to explain the IC law to you. And yet......

I gave you quotes in both cases and you persist in saying I didn't really say what I said.
You must be starved for attention.
I'm not.
 
By Toadies, do you mean a group of very passionate and intelligent leaders in this community and across America that happen to think a lying corrupt narcissist in office ie: Hillary would be a shame? If so, then I'm proud to be called a Toadie :)

Suit yourself:
toady: a person who behaves obsequiously to someone important.
synonyms: sycophant, brown-noser, lickspittle, flatterer, flunky, lackey, trained seal, doormat, stooge, cringer;
 
I gave you quotes in both cases and you persist in saying I didn't really say what I said.
You must be starved for attention.
I'm not.
You persist in saying you made everything clear. I maintain it was not that clear and came too little, too late. It's all a matter of opinion. You've got yours. I've got mine. Why can't you leave it at that?

Addendum: It occurred to me your reference to "quotes" were your opinions about the IC law and not that other thing with t.b. in which case I've already allowed that it's possible (even though not part of the IC law) that a president could ask his/her AG to appoint one. But that's not how your position started out, was it. I believe you began this whole exchange with an assertion that it was within a president's power to directly appoint an IC. So, you've altered your position to the hypothetical idea the a president might merely ask an AG to appoint one. The law doesn't even consider that option but I guess you can have the opinion that it's still there if you like.
 
Last edited:
And yet all that anger and venom aimed at a woman who is twice your worth tell us that can't be true. Sad.

My disdain is having a criminal pair in the White House. A proven criminal pair.

As for "worth"... I live an honest, happy, and successful life. I live the mantra of Napoleon Hill... give more than expected of you, and that has brought much of everything desirable.

Hillary may have more net worth, but worth as a human being... living a constant lie... she doesn't live a percentile of my worth... thank you very much. I don't sell my soul... ever. She made a habit of it.

This here is a community service (and entertainment) It's a waste of my precious time, but I believe in giving back... trying to educate those the Demokrat elite call "unaware and compliant"...

...Folks like you... for I was once similar to you. I was once a Leftist too... Though I'd never have supported a rapist, nor national security threat.

And as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599

And there you are.
 
Last edited:
My disdain is having a criminal pair in the White House. A proven criminal pair.

As for "worth"... I live an honest, happy, and successful life. I live the mantra of Napoleon Hill... give more than expected of you, and that has brought much of everything desirable.

Hillary may have more net worth, but worth as a human being... living a constant lie... she doesn't live a percentile of my worth... thank you very much. I don't sell my soul... ever. She made a habit of it.

This here is a community service (and entertainment) It's a waste of my precious time, but I believe in giving back... trying to educate those the Demokrat elite call "unaware and compliant"...

...Folks like you... for I was once similar to you. Though I'd never have supported a rapist, nor national security threat.



And there you are.

Well, bless your sainted heart, then. You're a treasure obviously. I had no idea I was in the presence of holiness and purity. And yet.... there's that underlying seething hatred for people whose politics you don't like. Seems like there's a disconnect somewhere in your self-assessment. Oh, well, I'm sure The Lord will sort it all out eventually.
 
Well, bless your sainted heart, then. You're a treasure obviously. I had no idea I was in the presence of holiness and purity. And yet.... there's that underlying seething hatred for people whose politics you don't like. Seems like there's a disconnect somewhere in your self-assessment. Oh, well, I'm sure The Lord will sort it all out eventually.

I am a treasure. If only you could ask my clients and my best babe. :)

I didn't claim to be holy or saintly... but I do follow some pretty simple rules to a successful life. Personally and professionally.

I was a Leftist, and like true believers who become disenchanted with the corrupt Left, I have seen no reason to do anything but deride the sickness known as the Demokrat Party and their propagandists.

Many Leftists are products of the Leftist destruction of society, and are "unaware and compliant"... these people are not evil, they're misguided, or misinformed, or not informed at all.

The evil SOB's who created this mass of ignorance... politicians, media, "educators"... deserve a special place in hell, and those who know better and still continue feeding the poison deserve to join them.
 
Last edited:
How many times had Trump lied about Clinton or called Clinton a liar well before the 40 minute mark....a dozen? Two dozen?

You were responding to my Post 55: "But I couldn't believe that she instantly made the debate personal." "Instantly" meant during the very first question. Which is exactly what she did.

You response in Post 113 was "You must of watched the debate in another universe--the reverse universe. But, I'd love to see you try to describe how it was HRC who first turned it 'personal.'" My reply to this is that I watched the entire debate. I'm guessing now that you did not, certainly not the debate's beginning.

Here, see from 8:35 forward. This is what I'm talking about--when she went after Trump and his not being fit to be President. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRlI2SQ0Ueg
 
Your claim is that Trump is justified in vowing to send Hillary to prison, spitting in the face of due process, because Hillary got personal earlier in the debate ??

This election has been personal for some time. It only recently escalated to levels of threatening to falsely imprison a political opponent.

Might I suggest that you read what I've actually written rather than what you are imagining? I have made no statement whatsoever about Trump's remark about how Clinton would be in jail if he were President. I have expressed no opinion at all on this. NONE.
 
Might I suggest that you read what I've actually written rather than what you are imagining? I have made no statement whatsoever about Trump's remark about how Clinton would be in jail if he were President. I have expressed no opinion at all on this. NONE.

Oh, sorry, i assumed that you were somewhere in the ballpark of the topic when you strained to make excuses for Trump's unconstitutional desire to falsely imprison Hillary.
 
Good heavens. Talking to leftists is a chore. LOL

Are you an adult?

Do I need to get some crayons and draw you a picture?
Pointing out the hypocrisy of your position does not make me a "leftist". Furthermore, I'm not the one who seems to having difficulty understanding the point.

It's really simple. You criticized the justice system, then criticized someone else who criticized the justice system. That's hypocrisy, not just in a "leftist" world, but in the world of reality in which most of us live.

You could just do the right thing and acknowledge the hypocrisy and move on. But it appears you'd rather just flail blindly at the wind hoping to distract people from the hypocrisy.
 
I was a Leftist,

Of all the BS your type peddle that has become the standard joke for people who really understand what being on the left means. I know you (and all like you) think that's a show-stopper line but it's just so trite and worn-out that it's sad. Sad.
 
My disdain is having a criminal pair in the White House. A proven criminal pair.

As for "worth"... I live an honest, happy, and successful life. I live the mantra of Napoleon Hill... give more than expected of you, and that has brought much of everything desirable.

Hillary may have more net worth, but worth as a human being... living a constant lie... she doesn't live a percentile of my worth... thank you very much. I don't sell my soul... ever. She made a habit of it.

This here is a community service (and entertainment) It's a waste of my precious time, but I believe in giving back... trying to educate those the Demokrat elite call "unaware and compliant"...

...Folks like you... for I was once similar to you. I was once a Leftist too... Though I'd never have supported a rapist, nor national security threat.



And there you are.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. You keep saying you're all sunshine and smiles out of one side of your mouth and showing us the real you with that spite-and-false witness-filled malarkey. Self-reflection takes brutal honesty and you don't even come close.
 
You were responding to my Post 55: "But I couldn't believe that she instantly made the debate personal." "Instantly" meant during the very first question. Which is exactly what she did.

Nope, she didn't but I understand why you'd have to keep pretending it happened like that when you've got that immoral, lying Tangerine Hulk of a lout to defend. His lack of fitness for the presidency (or dog catcher for that matter) is a pertinent and important issue. Attacking her personally for Bill Clinton's behavior, which came in just his third comment, and adding several blatant about her past lies in the same breath (followed by snnnnniiiiiiiiiifffffffffffff) was the first gratuitous and personal attack of the debate and it came after just the first audience question.
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You keep saying you're all sunshine and smiles out of one side of your mouth and showing us the real you with that spite-and-false witness-filled malarkey. Self-reflection takes brutal honesty and you don't even come close.

ROTFLOL... I see honesty, success and happiness bothers you more than a little.

The Demokrats, had they not hypocrisy, they'd have nothing.

How does one support a criminal and her sexual deviant husband which she played attack dog for... for president?

It takes moral bankruptcy and whole bunch of intellectual dishonesty... that's how. And Demokrats have been showing how that works since Bill Clinton was elected.

As one of his hatchetman was emailed, you folks, the followers, are both "unaware and compliant"... or as also noted... morally and intellectually bankrupt.

I was a Leftist once, saw the putrid state of the dishonest party and left it.
 
Trump has no inner thug unless your a total wimp. He hires thugs because he doesn't have it in him. If Donald Trump hadn't been born a multimillionaire he'd just be a pitiful jerk. He was born a multimillionaire so he's a rich pitiful jerk.
 

That has nothing to do with thugs and has nothing to do with pitiful. You are aware that pollsters don't poll either dead people or foreign nationals, aren't you? We all know how dead people vote.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are both rich bullies who hire their thugs. Hey, it worked for Al Capone. He was totally innocent according to some of anything but income tax evasion.
 
ROTFLOL... I see honesty, success and happiness bothers you more than a little.

The Demokrats, had they not hypocrisy, they'd have nothing.

How does one support a criminal and her sexual deviant husband which she played attack dog for... for president?

It takes moral bankruptcy and whole bunch of intellectual dishonesty... that's how. And Demokrats have been showing how that works since Bill Clinton was elected.

As one of his hatchetman was emailed, you folks, the followers, are both "unaware and compliant"... or as also noted... morally and intellectually bankrupt.

I was a Leftist once, saw the putrid state of the dishonest party and left it.

Every one of your comments puts the lie to the image you have of yourself so by all means keep them up.
 
That has nothing to do with thugs and has nothing to do with pitiful. You are aware that pollsters don't poll either dead people or foreign nationals, aren't you? We all know how dead people vote.

Do you see dead people often?
 
That has nothing to do with thugs and has nothing to do with pitiful. You are aware that pollsters don't poll either dead people or foreign nationals, aren't you? We all know how dead people vote.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are both rich bullies who hire their thugs. Hey, it worked for Al Capone. He was totally innocent according to some of anything but income tax evasion.

:lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom