• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What Will Hillary Actually Do?

With an 18,000 point Dow and 5% unemployment, the people saying "America is hopeless" are probably hopeless. I really don't care what the basket of deplorables think anymore. **** them.

I think we shall see fairly soon who is ****** and who is not.
 
Hillary will continue to line her pockets and take away the lifestyle you hold dear. She wants to disarm the American populace. What is the first thing every dictator does? They disarm the populace and then they line their pockets.
 
So is Trump. 'Dr. Strangelove and How I learned to love the Bomb'...



Every single day Trump is proving you wrong and showing the American public just how blinded to Trump's daily lewd and vicious comments, and to his past.. His supporters are very naive. It is truly like a cult.

Boy, the lack of self awareness here is breath taking.
 
Hillary will continue to line her pockets and take away the lifestyle you hold dear. She wants to disarm the American populace. What is the first thing every dictator does? They disarm the populace and then they line their pockets.

you think Clinton needs more money (shes rich) and that she will disarm the public?

wow
 
With an 18,000 point Dow and 5% unemployment, the people saying "America is hopeless" are probably hopeless. I really don't care what the basket of deplorables think anymore. **** them.

Yep, she's also going to do what you just did. Try to pass off blatant propganda as accurate economic data.
She will continue the Obama tradition of speaking directly to the stupidiest people in America by posting BS propganda like unemployment data with out the context of the labor participation rate.

Or brag about the DOW thats been propped up over the last 8 years with unprecedented monetary stimulus and Fed ZIRP policies.

You know, the zero interest policy the FEDs stuck to over the last 8 years because our economy is doung so great ??

Say what you will about the " deplorables " but at least they're smart enough to see through the Democrats BS economic data.
 
So is Trump. 'Dr. Strangelove and How I learned to love the Bomb'...



Every single day Trump is proving you wrong and showing the American public just how blinded to Trump's daily lewd and vicious comments, and to his past.. His supporters are very naive. It is truly like a cult.

Oh please. While you're welcome to cling to that meme, it only radiates to the edges of Hillary's hardcore supporters.

Do you think the majority of voters don't see the massive manipulation of fact Hillary's MSM partners have been undertaking?

Do you think they don't notice Hillary's MSM partners pushing these extremely revealing and damaging leaked speech excerpts aside to run with this 11 year old hot mic audio?

Do you think they don't notice the extreme hypocrisy of Hillary when she attacks Trump for his lewd comments, while excusing her husbands predatory actions, and worse, attacking his victims?

What this blind support, or perhaps in your case tolerance, is showing is those who are voting for her have no ethical compass, and/or no desire to apply it if it ever existed.
 
I think we shall see fairly soon who is ****** and who is not.

All I can say is that if the deplorables really did not want to see Hillary as president, they should have voted for someone who can beat her. Any of the top 4 or 5 GOP candidates not named Trump would have done that.

IMO, nominating the one guy who cannot beat her speaks volumes. You guys really do want President Hillary. Must be a sexual thing.
 
As Hillary pulls ahead in the polls, and it looks increasingly like she'll win the election, the question for her supporters is "what will she actually do?". You can't go by anything she's said because she lies about everything. Which of the groups that she's promised things to will actually get what they want? Which will find their concerns ignored?

My grand unified field theory of Hillary is that what she will do will be those things that further enrich her, the same sorts of things she's done all along. So she will be returning to her base in Wall Street and the other crony corporate fat cats. Those are the people who will get what they want from a President Hillary. The rest of you can go pound sand. This means we'll see her open the borders and bring more cheap labor in, and to Hell with poor US citizens. Hillary's friends in the corporate world will get special dispensation and small businesses and other competitors will suffer. Hillary's friends will do no wrong while everyone else will be oppressed and harassed by government regulators and taxing authorities. Overall prosperity will sink while the rich get richer still.

It follows the same general rule that was so accurate in predicting what Obama would do. What she's done in the past and the associations she's made in the past will predict what she does in the future. She will continue to sell influence, collect bull**** speaker's fees and other goodies from corporations, and so on, all while giving them what they want -- cheap labor, protection from competition, protection from regulators and taxing authorities.

For the social side of things it will be the same general rule. Her previous associations and projects will continue. She has always been hard left in that regard, and so we can expect more of the same when it comes to social questions. More and more racial and gender divisiveness and contention as a general rule.

Hillary will continue to sell out the U.S. and it's citizens to private corporations.
 
you think Clinton needs more money (shes rich) and that she will disarm the public?

wow

She's rich but she still has to return a few favors if you know what I mean.
 
The very business friendly GOP has been guilty of this, probably even more than the Dems. But if you can't, or won't grasp that the GOP has for decades, for the benefit of their Corporate masters and lobbyists, kept the borders open so the Corps and businesses can have cheap labor and keep wages here down, then your other opinions mean little.

On this very important issue if all you got is the same old tire BS about illegal immigration and open borders are all the Dems fault so the illegals can come here just to vote Dem, then you haven't a clue about any issues.

Both parties are very much guilty of being in support of illegal immigration.
 
People who can grab a ***** with consequences, of course. In other words, some of the best of the Democratic Party leaders.

:lamo

Oh that's good, and so very true.
 
She's rich but she still has to return a few favors if you know what I mean.

They'll all be lining up at Hillary's White House back door for their turn to collect from her.

All the over paid speeches, all the donators to The Clinton Foundation.
 
Both parties are very much guilty of being in support of illegal immigration.

Oh my, I 100% agree. But 90% of the time when Republican talk about illegals they put ALL the blame on the Dems, and they rehash the same old tired line that it's just the Dems who are opening the borders so the illegals can come here and vote Dem.

The reality is the Corps and Corps lobbyists want open borders, so the business friendly GOP is happy with open borders too. The GOP has had PLENTY of chances to fix the problem and shut the borders, but they never have. Why? Because the GOP's business masters love the cheap labor illegals provide.
 
Yep, she's also going to do what you just did. Try to pass off blatant propganda as accurate economic data.
She will continue the Obama tradition of speaking directly to the stupidiest people in America by posting BS propganda like unemployment data with out the context of the labor participation rate.

Or brag about the DOW thats been propped up over the last 8 years with unprecedented monetary stimulus and Fed ZIRP policies.

You know, the zero interest policy the FEDs stuck to over the last 8 years because our economy is doung so great ??

Say what you will about the " deplorables " but at least they're smart enough to see through the Democrats BS economic data.

Everyone knows what her public position has been, in she's been propaganding it all through her stump speeches.

Her private position, appears to be:
Excerpts of the speeches given in the years before her 2016 presidential campaign included some blunt and unguarded remarks to her private audiences, which collectively had paid her at least $26.1 million in speaking fees. Clinton had refused to release transcripts of the speeches, despite repeated calls to do so by her primary opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders.
. . . .
One excerpt put Clinton squarely in the free-trade camp, a position she has retreated on significantly during the 2016 election. In a talk to a Brazilian bank in 2013, she said her "dream" is "a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders" and asked her audience to think of what doubling American trade with Latin America "would mean for everybody in this room."
Clinton called for 'open trade and open borders' in private, paid speeches

I suspect that she'll go more so with the latter than the former, as it's pretty clear that she really don't think about or care for the common people that make up the electorate, and believes that she can placate them with, as you've termed, propaganda.
 
If you noticed, the MSM as ceased to mention common jobs being replace by H1B slave labor. I suspect they will quietly allow h1B's to be used to cut American labor costs to make us more competitive globally.

There are three ways to get more competitive:
Cut corporate taxes
Cut labor costs
Institute tarffs

Hillary shows no inclination to cut taxes or raise tariffs, so cutting labor costs is the go to solution and the easiest way to do that is with immigrant labor and H1B visas.
 
Oh please. While you're welcome to cling to that meme, it only radiates to the edges of Hillary's hardcore supporters.

Do you think the majority of voters don't see the massive manipulation of fact Hillary's MSM partners have been undertaking?

Do you think they don't notice Hillary's MSM partners pushing these extremely revealing and damaging leaked speech excerpts aside to run with this 11 year old hot mic audio?

Do you think they don't notice the extreme hypocrisy of Hillary when she attacks Trump for his lewd comments, while excusing her husbands predatory actions, and worse, attacking his victims?

What this blind support, or perhaps in your case tolerance, is showing is those who are voting for her have no ethical compass, and/or no desire to apply it if it ever existed.

You're calling those voting for Hillary clinton not having a moral compass while you vote for a guy who likes to grope women, call them pigs and miss housekeeping and agrees with other men calling his OWN daughter a hot piece of ass. You sir, have no credibility at all.
 
If you noticed, the MSM as ceased to mention common jobs being replace by H1B slave labor. I suspect they will quietly allow h1B's to be used to cut American labor costs to make us more competitive globally.

There are three ways to get more competitive:
Cut corporate taxes
Cut labor costs
Institute tarffs

Hillary shows no inclination to cut taxes or raise tariffs, so cutting labor costs is the go to solution and the easiest way to do that is with immigrant labor and H1B visas.

Her economic plan is essentially Obama's Green Jobs iniative part deux.

You know because chronyism and Govt malinvestment worked so well the first time

If she sticks to that plan we're screwed.
 
As Hillary pulls ahead in the polls, and it looks increasingly like she'll win the election, the question for her supporters is "what will she actually do?". You can't go by anything she's said because she lies about everything. Which of the groups that she's promised things to will actually get what they want? Which will find their concerns ignored?

My grand unified field theory of Hillary is that what she will do will be those things that further enrich her, the same sorts of things she's done all along. So she will be returning to her base in Wall Street and the other crony corporate fat cats. Those are the people who will get what they want from a President Hillary. The rest of you can go pound sand. This means we'll see her open the borders and bring more cheap labor in, and to Hell with poor US citizens. Hillary's friends in the corporate world will get special dispensation and small businesses and other competitors will suffer. Hillary's friends will do no wrong while everyone else will be oppressed and harassed by government regulators and taxing authorities. Overall prosperity will sink while the rich get richer still.

It follows the same general rule that was so accurate in predicting what Obama would do. What she's done in the past and the associations she's made in the past will predict what she does in the future. She will continue to sell influence, collect bull**** speaker's fees and other goodies from corporations, and so on, all while giving them what they want -- cheap labor, protection from competition, protection from regulators and taxing authorities.

For the social side of things it will be the same general rule. Her previous associations and projects will continue. She has always been hard left in that regard, and so we can expect more of the same when it comes to social questions. More and more racial and gender divisiveness and contention as a general rule.

I expect she'll continue pretty much the same policies we have in place now, the same ones that were in place during the past administration. I don't expect any major changes after the election. Congress will continue to be deadlocked due to hyper partisanship, medical care costs will continue to soar, the Middle East will continue to be a hell hole, and wages for unskilled labor will still stagnate.
 
As Hillary pulls ahead in the polls, and it looks increasingly like she'll win the election, the question for her supporters is "what will she actually do?". You can't go by anything she's said because she lies about everything. Which of the groups that she's promised things to will actually get what they want? Which will find their concerns ignored?

My grand unified field theory of Hillary is that what she will do will be those things that further enrich her, the same sorts of things she's done all along. So she will be returning to her base in Wall Street and the other crony corporate fat cats. Those are the people who will get what they want from a President Hillary. The rest of you can go pound sand. This means we'll see her open the borders and bring more cheap labor in, and to Hell with poor US citizens. Hillary's friends in the corporate world will get special dispensation and small businesses and other competitors will suffer. Hillary's friends will do no wrong while everyone else will be oppressed and harassed by government regulators and taxing authorities. Overall prosperity will sink while the rich get richer still.

It follows the same general rule that was so accurate in predicting what Obama would do. What she's done in the past and the associations she's made in the past will predict what she does in the future. She will continue to sell influence, collect bull**** speaker's fees and other goodies from corporations, and so on, all while giving them what they want -- cheap labor, protection from competition, protection from regulators and taxing authorities.

For the social side of things it will be the same general rule. Her previous associations and projects will continue. She has always been hard left in that regard, and so we can expect more of the same when it comes to social questions. More and more racial and gender divisiveness and contention as a general rule.

In other words, she will ride us 8 years deeper into the dead end?
 
In other words, she will ride us 8 years deeper into the dead end?

That appears to be what the "new America" wants.

We can't have socialism and open borders, but the Democrats are going to try!
 
You're calling those voting for Hillary clinton not having a moral compass while you vote for a guy who likes to grope women, call them pigs and miss housekeeping and agrees with other men calling his OWN daughter a hot piece of ass. You sir, have no credibility at all.

LOL

I'm voting for the person who doesn't excuse and attempt to cover up their spouses sexual behavior, and in turn attack his victims. I'm voting for someone who doesn't deploy a global machine to lie, distort, manipulate.

That you do support such a person eliminates any thoughts you might have on credibility.
 
but T-Rrump supporters don't mind if people make those kind of comments because all people do it. haven't you been following trump's defenders?
You didn't answer the question from the OP. You're deflecting.
so you're doubling down on the remarks that lost trump the election
You still didn't answer the OP, and continued to deflect.
You're calling those voting for Hillary clinton not having a moral compass while you vote for a guy who likes to grope women, call them pigs and miss housekeeping and agrees with other men calling his OWN daughter a hot piece of ass. You sir, have no credibility at all.
You didn't answer the OP either. Just deflected like the other guy.
I expect she'll continue pretty much the same policies we have in place now, the same ones that were in place during the past administration. I don't expect any major changes after the election. Congress will continue to be deadlocked due to hyper partisanship, medical care costs will continue to soar, the Middle East will continue to be a hell hole, and wages for unskilled labor will still stagnate.
Congratulations. It's page 5 and you're the first democrat to answer.
 
You didn't answer the question from the OP. You're deflecting.

You still didn't answer the OP, and continued to deflect.

You didn't answer the OP either. Just deflected like the other guy.

Congratulations. It's page 5 and you're the first democrat to answer.

Yes, and I was a Republican until my former party nominated Donald Trump.
 
Back
Top Bottom