• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Wikileaks Release

cpwill said:
1. Trump said nothing about invitation, he started that he just moves in to take it because he wants it.

2. Multiple women have confirmed that is precisely what he tries to do.

3. If you think a married woman wearing a skirt is a potential invitation for other men to stick their hands up it (as Trump apparently thinks), then for your health I recommend you avoid putting that belief into practice in the South.
Click to expand...

I understand all that.
The reason that I didn't jump to accusations such as assault, is because, I don't take him literally almost never and I wasn't sure about their actual relationship or if there was one.

cpwill said:
Shoving a woman into a wall and grabbing her breasts with her boyfriend in the next room isn't "making the first move in a relationship".
Click to expand...

Yes, in that context it is not.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Here's something on gun control.

She'll allegedly use executive orders to do things, rather than having congress pass bills.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1509
Click to expand...

Utterly frightening. It's like she wants Wall Street to run the country's policies or something...

This also contradicts her views on police. If gun restrictions skyrocket under her administration, then police brutality will update accordingly.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
I'm always willing to let a lot of history and muddled things be "in the past."
When it comes to Hillary I generally try to focus on her tenure as SOS and could be persuaded to believe that the Benghazi incident was not intentional.

My criticism of her is generally her gross failure of leadership in regards to other things.
Click to expand...

She was a Senator too you know, not just SoS.
 
Carleen said:
Wow you must work with some deplorable people.
Click to expand...

Am I the only one that noticed that the word deplorable is being used more often on the forum lately? Did some of you people just learn it or something?
 
Abbazorkzog said:
Utterly frightening. It's like she wants Wall Street to run the country's policies or something...

This also contradicts her views on police. If gun restrictions skyrocket under her administration, then police brutality will update accordingly.
Click to expand...

It's more like she doesn't want to deal with opposition to her agenda. Why send anything to congress when you have a pen is basically her mindset.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
Why?
Because they say uncouth, exaggerated things?

If that bothers you so much, I'd suggest getting a thicker set of skin.
Click to expand...

Why because I'm a woman so that gives you the right to say lewd things about them.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
What is so bad about the excerpt from hilliary's statement.
Click to expand...

Well, speaking as a Canadian any reference by a US Presidential hopeful to a "hemispheric common market with open borders..." raises hackles. As an American, why don't your hackles raise at the reference to a "public position and a private position on policy."?
 
Henrin said:
Am I the only one that noticed that the word deplorable is being used more often on the forum lately? Did some of you people just learn it or something?
Click to expand...

Nah, it fits Trump and his sheeples.
 
Grand Mal said:
Well, speaking as a Canadian any reference by a US Presidential hopeful to a "hemispheric common market with open borders..." raises hackles. As an American, why don't your hackles raise at the reference to a "public position and a private position on policy."?
Click to expand...

All politicans have public positions and private positions. It's part of politics
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
All politicans have public positions and private positions. It's part of politics
Click to expand...

She was essentially saying to those money moguls, "Don't worry about what I say in speeches, that's just the public position."
 
Last edited:
American said:
Funny, it was okay with you when Bill Clinton did it.
Click to expand...
Yup. I have as little respect for those who excuse/deny/ignore it from Clinton as those who do so from Trump. If the defining question for you on a matter of sexual assault is is this good for my side, you're a deplorable person (coughhillarycough).

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
All politicians have to do this. To pretend that they don't is naive.
Click to expand...

Not all Politicians, Hillary Clinton, who was payed Millions by Wall Street investment firms. It appears their investment might just pay off.

If a 2 policy strategy was such common knowledge then Politicians wouldn't bother with faux narratives, unless they were trying to appeal to the uniformed voter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom