• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BREAKING: Guccifer 2.0 Hacked Clinton Foundation

roughdraft274 said:
Maybe they should try to find some real ****. Not baseless accusations. I'm still having to enlighten people daily that:

Hillary didn't order a standdown for Benghazzi.
Hillary wasn't sleeping through the Benghazzi attack.
Hillary hasn't had people killed. The hitlist is just a chain email for the gullible.
The clintons didn't steal furniture from the whitehouse. There was a misunderstanding on what gifts were gifts to the Clintons and what gifts were gifts to the whitehouse itself. They promptly worked out any errors, and even after returning some items when asked it was later found out that some of those items were in fact theirs.


And I have a feeling that for the next two months I'm going to have to explain to a bunch of idiots that, no, the clinton foundation doesn't have a "pay to play" folder sitting on their server. And then they'll complain about how nothing sticks.
Click to expand...

Know what they did take from the White House? The 'W's from all the keyboards!

Or so I heard...
 
Crovax said:
And I suppose this is all just made up too?



White House Vandalized In Transition, G.A.O. Finds
Click to expand...

I said nothing on that topic because it's never been brought up. But I'd argue that there being 15,000 dollars worth of clean up due to pranks/damage to the whitehouse, which I see no evidence that any of it was from the actual Clintons or top level staff, is very different than "Hillary has ordered numerous people killed". Hopefully you can understand the profound difference between these two claims?
 
roughdraft274 said:
I said nothing on that topic because it's never been brought up. But I'd argue that there being 15,000 dollars worth of clean up due to pranks/damage to the whitehouse, which I see no evidence that any of it was from the actual Clintons or top level staff, is very different than "Hillary has ordered numerous people killed". Hopefully you can understand the profound difference between these two claims?
Click to expand...

I never said anything about that conspiracy theory. I was simply adding on to the white house gifts part.

And while the Clinton's technically didn't steal anything, they had an intentionally non-existant record keeping for gifts.

I like how you have tried to tie the people who claim that the Clintons are shady people with the crazy conspiracy people who claim the Clintons are murderers.
 
Lutherf said:
Well, when you get right down to it a "Pay to Play" folder isn't a great thing for the VA or National Democrats either.
Click to expand...

Beliving a screenshot of some folders is evidence of a hack is not exactly a testimonial to the intelligence of American right wingers either. Anyone can create any list of folders they want, then screenshot that folder window, and then claim that its evidenced of a hack.
 
Lutherf said:
There's a folder called "Pay to Play"? That's freaking hilarious!!!

Well, if it turns out to be the real deal it'll be hilarious....in a sad and warped kind of way.
Click to expand...

I saw that and tapped on it just hoping. Lol
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Beliving a screenshot of some folders is evidence of a hack is not exactly a testimonial to the intelligence of American right wingers either. Anyone can create any list of folders they want, then screenshot that folder window, and then claim that its evidenced of a hack.
Click to expand...

That's true, but the update DiAnna noted spoke specifically to the source which, while not the Clinton Foundation, is still significant.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Beliving a screenshot of some folders is evidence of a hack is not exactly a testimonial to the intelligence of American right wingers either. Anyone can create any list of folders they want, then screenshot that folder window, and then claim that its evidenced of a hack.
Click to expand...
Trump is being tried in the "Court of Slime" by the Democrats, so they shouldn't expect any brakes.
 
Lutherf said:
That's true, but the update DiAnna noted spoke specifically to the source which, while not the Clinton Foundation, is still significant.
Click to expand...

Significant for the DNC and moreso for the Democratic Party of Virginia, perhaps. Not significant for Hillary's campaign or the Clinton Foundation.
 
DiAnna said:
Significant for the DNC and moreso for the Democratic Party of Virginia, perhaps. Not significant for Hillary's campaign or the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
Cardinal said:
"Pay to play?" That's too goofy to be true. This has got to be Snopes bait.
Click to expand...

Snopes responded within 2 hours yesterday after WikiLeaks released their Tweet about Hillary wanting to drone Assange. They're silent today on this Guccifer 2.0 story. :mrgreen:
 
tres borrachos said:
"Intern Sandbox"? Sounds kinky.

Sorry, I'm not buying. The Clinton Foundation computer has a list of the big banks that got TARP money and how much they donated to Barney Frank?
Click to expand...

That was the first big flag to me. Clinton had pretty much nothing to do with TARP, so why tie TARP donations with donations?
 
Lutherf said:
Well, when you get right down to it a "Pay to Play" folder isn't a great thing for the VA or National Democrats either.
Click to expand...

That is.. if that is a real folder, rather than just some documents put in someone else's computer.
 
RAMOSS said:
That is.. if that is a real folder, rather than just some documents put in someone else's computer.
Click to expand...

Of course, and that was my first thought. However, with the update to the Daily Caller article it does appear to be a real folder from a real Democrat organization, just not the Clinton Foundation.
 
Lutherf said:
Of course, and that was my first thought. However, with the update to the Daily Caller article it does appear to be a real folder from a real Democrat organization, just not the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

Well, .. yes.. it's the Daily Caller. Somehow, I don't think they would be able to back that up with actual evidence. I don't really accept their spin, on just about anything.
 
In 24 hours we have had this hacking joke, the wikileaks dud, and the RNC posting victory info for the debate an hour ahead of time and Drudge posting a story about Clinton's son...one in which he debunked in 1999.


What a glorious day of FAIL for the wingnuts.
 
Crovax said:
I never said anything about that conspiracy theory. I was simply adding on to the white house gifts part.

And while the Clinton's technically didn't steal anything, they had an intentionally non-existant record keeping for gifts.

I like how you have tried to tie the people who claim that the Clintons are shady people with the crazy conspiracy people who claim the Clintons are murderers.
Click to expand...

I'm not tying them together. I'm making a list of lies about the clintons and they both fit on that list. I'm not saying if you believe one you have to believe them all.

And even now you are suggesting that you know for a fact that they didn't keep clear records of gifts on purpose. Do you have evidence for this assertion?
 
Lutherf said:
Well, when you get right down to it a "Pay to Play" folder isn't a great thing for the VA or National Democrats either.
Click to expand...

And there it is.
 
DiAnna said:
Significant for the DNC and moreso for the Democratic Party of Virginia, perhaps. Not significant for Hillary's campaign or the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

It's significant to independents. It's the worse thing ever to Righties and swept under the rug by lefties. But indies are gonna "WTF" about a goddamn file labelled "PAY TO PLAY" and that DWS was leader of the DNC cheating against Bernie Sanders all the live long day. That's what matters is what Indies think.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom