• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roger Stone: Wednesday will be end of Clinton's campaign

"But by the end, Jones realized he’d been played — or in his words, “#wikirolled.”"
 
azgreg said:
No you haven't because I haven't stated a position on Wikileaks.
Click to expand...

You posted in opposition to what I was writing, which was that the Wikileaks information has been deemed valid for years.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
My mistake, I skipped a few steps.

He is afraid of being extradited to sweeden, where he is accused of rape, being put on trial and being convicted for committing rape, and then spending years in a Swedish prison.
Click to expand...

Oh and uh releasing classified documents-- pretty serious crime there too.
 
Fishking said:
You posted in opposition to what I was writing, which was that the Wikileaks information has been deemed valid for years.
Click to expand...

I didn't make a single comment about Wikileaks to you or did I make a stand one way or the other in this thread. However, I think I understand the basis of our confusion.

The problem we're having is the word fact. You asked "Can facts become un facts?" Technically I would say no. However, if you look at the definition of the word: A thing that is known or proved to be true.

At the time a flat earth was just that. Later is was proven to be false, but at the time is was taken as fact and that's what I was attempting to get at. I'll concede the point so we can get on with our day.
 
azgreg said:
I didn't make a single comment about Wikileaks to you or did I make a stand one way or the other in this thread. However, I think I understand the basis of our confusion.

The problem we're having is the word fact. You asked "Can facts become un facts?" Technically I would say no. However, if you look at the definition of the word: A thing that is known or proved to be true.

At the time a flat earth was just that. Later is was proven to be false, but at the time is was taken as fact and that's what I was attempting to get at. I'll concede the point so we can get on with our day.
Click to expand...

Until there has it gets proven otherwise, I'll go with something that has a better track record than the MSMs, government, ect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom