• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roger Stone: Wednesday will be end of Clinton's campaign

Chomsky said:
I'm at a loss to how you have determined his all emails are valid?

Do you have some source we're not aware?

Your claim to validity seems to be they're not actively being (publicly) disputed in the public arena, of which we're aware.
Click to expand...

Yes, that's all the validity there needs to be. Not one single person, group, or media outlet has ever questioned the validity. Therefore they are real. If I faked up an email with controversial information in it and attributed it to you you would raise the alarm on it. That's never happened a single time and how many years now? Seems like the only stretch here is questioning the validity, not accepting it.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Which means he most likely has nothing.
Click to expand...

Maybe. His track record is better than the MSMs so I don't have an issue with waiting to see what happens vice navel gazing and trying to discredit the information before it even comes out.
 
Fishking said:
Why would he be in prison?
Click to expand...

My mistake, I skipped a few steps.

He is afraid of being extradited to sweeden, where he is accused of rape, being put on trial and being convicted for committing rape, and then spending years in a Swedish prison.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
The New York Times released a bombshell story about trumps tax returns and they did not tease anyone about it.

Assange is setting himself up for failure by setting expectations so high.
Click to expand...

Here's the truth, the story about Trump's taxes is no bombshell. The alternative headline could have been "Trump files his taxes legally for years" and then it could have been reported that in addition to Trump, a large number of other companies have done the exact same thing regarding applying losses to offset taxes owed. No bombshell, just a bunch of pissed off liberals because a rich guy was afforded the same legal right that poor people use every year; use the system and the law to their advantage.

He may be. I have no idea what Assange has or doesn't have, and from what I've seen, the major media outlets are being pretty quiet about it so far. Which they should, until they have something to report.
 
Fishking said:
No it doesn't.




What does this have to do with anything? Information doesn't become false even if it comes from a serial killer. That aside, those charges were dropped.



What does this have to do with anything? Information doesn't become false even if it comes from a serial killer. This is all part of the Hillary/liberal smokescreen to try and distract from the fact that she is corrupt.
Click to expand...

I wish things were that simple........

Thank you for your sharing.........
 
imyoda said:
I wish things were that simple........

Thank you for your sharing.........
Click to expand...

It really is that simple. Facts don't become unfacts, regardless of the source, all character assassination attempts aside.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
What other external interests?
Click to expand...

Any claims by various governments to charge him for his leaks. It doesn't seem he's worried about facing the allegations of rape so much as being stomped by the U.S. for his role in Wikileaks. If any claims to his role in that aspect where forever dropped I think he'd come out of the embassy. Hell, he'd probably have already served his sentence by now, for as long as he has been imprisoned there.
 
The October Surprise today..........

Tomorrow Julian Assange will release a memo which he purports HRC suggested his assassination by drone..........

Snopes has ruled on it saying it is unproven..........

And has the memo for all to read........

You make up your own mind.........


E-mail leaked by WikiLeaks doesn't demonstrate that Hillary Clinton suggested assassinating founder Julian Assange via a drone strike
Claim: UNPROVEN
To Silence Wikileaks, Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange? : snopes.com
ALSO SEE:
Traitor Hater

Pundit Bob Beckel called for the assassination of Julian Assange in 2010, but not as a Hillary Clinton campaign strategist.
Bob Beckel Called for WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange to Be Assassinated : snopes.com

I wonder how many folks are going to be shocked to hear HRC may have contemplated the idea as Sect'y of State...........

For myself, I am upset because they didn't.........

Assange had/has become a threat to national security....... and it is common place to eliminate with extreme prejudice..........

But one must remember the best HRC could have done is make a recommendation to the President who is the only one who can make the decision to do so........

..... as they say a tempest in a tea kettle.......

Boy oh boy........ is Julian going to be disappointed........
 
Fishking said:
No it doesn't.




What does this have to do with anything? Information doesn't become false even if it comes from a serial killer. That aside, those charges were dropped.



What does this have to do with anything? Information doesn't become false even if it comes from a serial killer. This is all part of the Hillary/liberal smokescreen to try and distract from the fact that she is corrupt.
Click to expand...

Read on further and learn first-hand what the October Surprise is..........
 
Let me paraphrase this whole thread:

Conservatives: "Gee, I wonder what it'll be."
Liberals: "Well, considering his target is OUR guy, then we'll say he's crazy and discredit everything before we even know what it is. If it was dirt on Trump, we'd believe it 110% hook, line and sinker."
 
Chomsky said:
Fair enough, you might be right.

But I'm just blown away that any data that any hacker or hacker-data aggregator releases, is assumed to be integral, unmodified, and unedited - much less possibly completely fictitious!

I think it's a very dangerous thing to accept outside influence in our political process, from individuals, groups, or states. Putin's meddling is particularly troubling in my opinion.
Click to expand...

It has been in the past, I follow the tech stuff religiously and the media are still making a big deal out of the Yahoo hack. The thing, Yahoo didn't tell anybody about this for two years. So any data, leaked, will probably be old, but then again, being in tech support. I know most don't even know how to change their passwords. Let alone do it monthly.

I think after this election, people will begin to see the true nature of these hacks and what their goals are. People glossed over it during the hype, but it was clear that the Assange things were edited. To push his agenda through. Just people freak out at the word hack when it's used in a fear-mongering type of way. That's bound to happen. Hopefully people wise up soon.

Russian Hackers Altered Emails Before Release to Wikileaks - Updated
 
Velvet Elvis said:
Let me paraphrase this whole thread:

Conservatives: "Gee, I wonder what it'll be."
Liberals: "Well, considering his target is OUR guy, then we'll say he's crazy and discredit everything before we even know what it is. If it was dirt on Trump, we'd believe it 110% hook, line and sinker."
Click to expand...

The Republicans have had no major breaks in their security systems. Trump likewise has had nothing except that of which he himself leaks to the media. Republicans have smarter security because they are more paranoid about this type of stuff.
 
imyoda said:
Roger Stone: Wednesday will be end of Clinton's campaign



Roger Stone—Republican strategist, former Trump adviser, and self-described "hit man" for the GOP—lobbed a fairly large bomb on Twitter Sunday, announcing that Hillary Clinton's campaign would be destroyed on Wednesday by new information to be provided courtesy of Wikileaks.

Now Stone has been accused of being a lying trickster before, so this may be much ado about nothing. Assuming he's telling the truth, however, it certainly raises some questions about exactly how he is privy to this information, and exactly what his relationship is with accused rapist Julian Assange and with Assange's (potentially Russian) sources. Meanwhile, it's rather difficult to imagine exactly what this hypothetical leak could be, since the Benghazi, e-mail server, and Clinton Foundation horses have already been beaten to death, and since the conclusions that voters have reached on those matters—whether "guilty" or "innocent"—are unlikely to be swayed by new information. Perhaps she took a billion-dollar write-off on her taxes one year. Whatever it is, we'll find out—maybe—on Wednesday…………

Roger Stone: Wednesday will be end of Clinton's campaign | TheHill


ALSO SEE:
ElectoralVote

We can only wait to see just what it is.............where it came from...........and judge if it is damaging as alleged..........

Another strange twist to the first of the season's of docudramas................... called The Election of a President - 2016
Click to expand...

All of Trump's Earth-shattering campaign ending predictions have been false. What a shocker.
 
ModerateGOP said:
All of Trump's Earth-shattering campaign ending predictions have been false. What a shocker.
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with Trump? He's not even involved here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom