• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Now who is this guy Donald Trump, him being the head of the conservitive party.

The republican party is already dead , they just don't know it, why do you think that regressive are trying to take the vote away from all blocks of people who's majority are democrats? because they know they are doomed , Demographics will put them in the history books, You can't **** all over minorities and expect them to vote for you in the future. Minorities make up 1/3 of our population and soon will be half of the population. The canned hate party will be in the ground when another conservative party will replace this one and it will have to cooperate with the Democrats and will have to govern without hate , because if they do the turnover will be instant.
By the time they are thrown out of office the name republican will be so poisoned that they won't be able to use the name . I was thinking that the Bible Thumping Patriotic Christion conservative flag waver party sounds about right. What do you think?
Demographics will definitely be a big part of burying the party in a lot of states, but I think they have a slim shot. They gambled when they embraced the Tea Party and lost big with a lot of people. If there was a complete change in the party and they could find some George H.W.'s they might be able to survive. I think Stupid and Proud Party is a great name for their current configuration.
 
keira-knightley-skinny-body-keira-knightley-films-132335058c9574974e9f8111eedf3c26-large-1424562.jpg


natalie-portman-bikini-662353675.jpg


Both Kiera Knightley and Natalie Portman render your argument invalid.

I'm not sure you understand what a ten is. A woman being a ten means she is flawless. A woman can not be flawless and have boobs that are flawed.
 
Also, it's simply a fact that a woman that is flat chested will not be a ten. :shrug: Get over it.

oh come on, that's more important to the election than appointing SJW justices who think the courts should be used to get even for 250 years of white men having advantages over the rest of the citizenry?
 
I'm not sure you understand what a ten is. A woman being a ten means she is flawless. A woman can not be flawless and have boobs that are flawed.

actually ten is a subjective term. Sexually immature men tend to crave women with large mammary glands.
 
Anyone who thinks we actually have a conservative party in this country is an idiot.

Anyone who thinks we have a liberal party in this country is an idiot!
 
actually ten is a subjective term. Sexually immature men tend to crave women with large mammary glands.

I think most men would admit bigger than flat chested is preferable.
 
I'm not sure you understand what a ten is. A woman being a ten means she is flawless. A woman can not be flawless and have boobs that are flawed.

Only if you judge small boobs as a flaw. Small boobs aren't a flaw if they fit aesthetically with with the rest of the body. Kiera would look out of proportion with large boobs.
 
I think most men would admit bigger than flat chested is preferable.

nothing is a bigger turn off than pneumatic boobs IMHO. as I said, ten means many things to many people and its worthless to argue over. and its a pathetic argument against Trump by the Hillary faithful. It just shows how pathetic both parties and both candidates are for this issue to have any relevance to the election
 
You disagree? I guess you're free to have no taste.

Or I know the difference between objective fact and subjective opinion. The value of education...
 
“Why do people think it’s egotistical of you to say you could’ve gotten with Lady Di?” Stern asked Trump in the interview. “You could’ve gotten her, right? You could’ve nailed her.”

Trump replied: “I think I could have.”

The interview [on Howard Stern] took place in 1997, just weeks after Princess Diana and her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, were killed --------------------------------- The sound track is here https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkacz...women-on-howar?utm_term=.do0LA4wzp#.dwzx78aAy and there is multiple sites saying that he said he never said what he is charged saying. But this puke is OK as far as the hate party is concerned.

There is something I find interesting in the fact that the country is excitedly discussing Clinton's fidelity and Trump's bad taste, when we are supposed to be making an employment decision for the most important job on the planet.
 
Princess Diana had her pick of handsome men. In his wildest dreams she wouldn't hook up with that nasty looking creature named Donald Trump.
 
Princess Diana had her pick of handsome men. In his wildest dreams she wouldn't hook up with that nasty looking creature named Donald Trump.
He has always got his wives by buying them, I think everyone knows that.
 
Zzzzzzzzzz... :yawn:

Oh sorry. More "Past Indiscretions?"

Hmmm, I wonder what tripe you might have said back in 1997 (if you were alive or even old enough to engage in a conversation back then)?

I also wonder how clear anyone's memories are of past statements, after the passage of nearly 20 years and possible changes in one's current outlook.

In any case, who cares? Really, since this is mere braggadocio and had nothing to do with government service at the time. :coffeepap:

Well, those of us who care about women not being treated like garbage care.
 
Princess Diana had her pick of handsome men. In his wildest dreams she wouldn't hook up with that nasty looking creature named Donald Trump.

How do you explain her husband then?
 
How do you explain her husband then?

Easy. She was 19 years old. He was (is) the future King of England and was at the time considered the most eligible bachelor in the world, because he was going to be the King of England.
 
“Why do people think it’s egotistical of you to say you could’ve gotten with Lady Di?” Stern asked Trump in the interview. “You could’ve gotten her, right? You could’ve nailed her.”

Trump replied: “I think I could have.”

The interview [on Howard Stern] took place in 1997, just weeks after Princess Diana and her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, were killed --------------------------------- The sound track is here https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkacz...women-on-howar?utm_term=.do0LA4wzp#.dwzx78aAy and there is multiple sites saying that he said he never said what he is charged saying. But this puke is OK as far as the hate party is concerned.

There seems to be a Conservative Party of New York but on a national level there is no conservative party in the U.S.

Donald Trump is a lifelong Democrat which means he not the head of the conservative anything. He's a liar, a huckster, a deadbeat, and a liberal. Sen. Clinton is a liar, a fraud, a bully, and a liberal.
 
There seems to be a Conservative Party of New York but on a national level there is no conservative party in the U.S.

Donald Trump is a lifelong Democrat which means he not the head of the conservative anything. He's a liar, a huckster, a deadbeat, and a liberal. Sen. Clinton is a liar, a fraud, a bully, and a liberal.
Ya You believe that bull**** but it looks like very little blood is getting to your brain. You calling him a Democrat shows exactly how creepy you guys can get. He is the absolute head of the hate party , that was once called the regressive party but when your party made Trump the head of your party, it was then the hate party. He got elected because he said the ugliest things possible and it was exactly what the hate party wanted to hear.
 
Zzzzzzzzzz... :yawn:

Oh sorry. More "Past Indiscretions?"

Hmmm, I wonder what tripe you might have said back in 1997 (if you were alive or even old enough to engage in a conversation back then)?

I also wonder how clear anyone's memories are of past statements, after the passage of nearly 20 years and possible changes in one's current outlook.

In any case, who cares? Really, since this is mere braggadocio and had nothing to do with government service at the time. :coffeepap:

That's to me the disturbing part. The last few "gotchas" from the anti Trumpers have all been dubious stories from 20 years or more ago.

4 pages of a decades old tax return. And Trump took deductions and carry forwards. Big whoop.

Trump wanted beauty queens years ago to look like beauty queens. Bigger whoop.

Trump took a student draft deferment when he was a student. Seriously? Super big whoop,

Trump engaged in light banter on a show known for light banter years ago. Even bigger.

If that's all that Trump has going against him, I'll give him a shot.
 
That's to me the disturbing part. The last few "gotchas" from the anti Trumpers have all been dubious stories from 20 years or more ago.

4 pages of a decades old tax return. And Trump took deductions and carry forwards. Big whoop.

Trump wanted beauty queens years ago to look like beauty queens. Bigger whoop.

Trump took a student draft deferment when he was a student. Seriously? Super big whoop,

Trump engaged in light banter on a show known for light banter years ago. Even bigger.

If that's all that Trump has going against him, I'll give him a shot.
More nonsence his a few up to date on your slime ball hero. The one I like is Trump University , that was him at his best. "The school shut down in 2010, but the litigation continues. New York is suing Trump, alleging the Trump U. bilked students out of $40 million. He’s also the subject of two class-action suits in California. Meanwhile, Trump appears to have been trying to intimidate plaintiffs, including countersuing one for $1 million (a favorite Trump litigation tactic) and refusing to let her withdraw from the suit. (The countersuit was thrown out.) His lawyers have cited positive reviews, but former students say they were pressured to give those. A set of damning internal documents were released by court order in May. Trump decided to attack the judge, claiming his ethnicity made him biased. Trump has been widely repudiated across the board, with fellow Republicans openly calling him racist." The guy is a scum bag and the right wants him for our president.
 
That's to me the disturbing part. The last few "gotchas" from the anti Trumpers have all been dubious stories from 20 years or more ago.

4 pages of a decades old tax return. And Trump took deductions and carry forwards. Big whoop.

Trump wanted beauty queens years ago to look like beauty queens. Bigger whoop.

Trump took a student draft deferment when he was a student. Seriously? Super big whoop,

Trump engaged in light banter on a show known for light banter years ago. Even bigger.

If that's all that Trump has going against him, I'll give him a shot.
What a joke From news week , "Documents show that the Trump company spent a minimum of $68,000 for its 1998 foray into Cuba at a time when the corporate expenditure of even a penny in the Caribbean country was prohibited without U.S. government approval. But the company did not spend the money directly. Instead, with Trump’s knowledge, executives funneled the cash for the Cuba trip through an American consulting firm called Seven Arrows Investment and Development Corporation. Once the business consultants traveled to the island and incurred the expenses for the venture, Seven Arrows instructed senior officers with Trump’s company—then called Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts—how to make it appear legal by linking it after-the-fact to a charitable effort." We can go on all day on and on because there are over 3500 of these law suits. I guess some kind of record.
 
That's to me the disturbing part. The last few "gotchas" from the anti Trumpers have all been dubious stories from 20 years or more ago.

4 pages of a decades old tax return. And Trump took deductions and carry forwards. Big whoop.

Trump wanted beauty queens years ago to look like beauty queens. Bigger whoop.

Trump took a student draft deferment when he was a student. Seriously? Super big whoop,

Trump engaged in light banter on a show known for light banter years ago. Even bigger.

If that's all that Trump has going against him, I'll give him a shot.
You live in a fantasy world ---We will just stick to the latest ones "On Friday, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent a letter to the Donald J. Trump Foundation, instructing it that its fundraising was in violation of the law and that it must stop immediately. Last week, The Washington Post reported that the foundation did not have the requisite permission and oversight to raise more than $25,000" (From the Atlantic.) This has to be done to bull the ripcord on the endless lies coming from the regressives.
 
More nonsence his a few up to date on your slime ball hero. The one I like is Trump University , that was him at his best. "The school shut down in 2010, but the litigation continues. New York is suing Trump, alleging the Trump U. bilked students out of $40 million. He’s also the subject of two class-action suits in California. Meanwhile, Trump appears to have been trying to intimidate plaintiffs, including countersuing one for $1 million (a favorite Trump litigation tactic) and refusing to let her withdraw from the suit. (The countersuit was thrown out.) His lawyers have cited positive reviews, but former students say they were pressured to give those. A set of damning internal documents were released by court order in May. Trump decided to attack the judge, claiming his ethnicity made him biased. Trump has been widely repudiated across the board, with fellow Republicans openly calling him racist." The guy is a scum bag and the right wants him for our president.

You're making my point. Trump University is last month's news and it didn't seem to have much effect.
 
That's to me the disturbing part. The last few "gotchas" from the anti Trumpers have all been dubious stories from 20 years or more ago.

4 pages of a decades old tax return. And Trump took deductions and carry forwards. Big whoop.

Trump wanted beauty queens years ago to look like beauty queens. Bigger whoop.

Trump took a student draft deferment when he was a student. Seriously? Super big whoop,

Trump engaged in light banter on a show known for light banter years ago. Even bigger.

If that's all that Trump has going against him, I'll give him a shot.
Look a little deeper--We will step this up to charges that Slimo is guilty of " While developer Donald Trump was busy getting the Republican Party’s presidential nomination this week, he was losing big in a Miami-Dade County courtroom.

Circuit Court Judge Jorge Cueto, presiding over a lawsuit related to unpaid bills brought by a local paint store against the Trump National Doral Miami golf resort, ordered the billionaire politician’s company to pay the Doral-based mom-and-pop shop nearly $300,000 in attorney’s fees.

All because, according to the lawsuit, Trump allegedly tried to stiff The Paint Spot on its last payment of $34,863 on a $200,000 contract for paint used in the renovation of the home of golf’s famed Blue Monster two years ago.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/ent-columns-blogs/jose-lambiet/article91353232.html#storylink=cpy"
 
What a joke From news week , "Documents show that the Trump company spent a minimum of $68,000 for its 1998 foray into Cuba at a time when the corporate expenditure of even a penny in the Caribbean country was prohibited without U.S. government approval. But the company did not spend the money directly. Instead, with Trump’s knowledge, executives funneled the cash for the Cuba trip through an American consulting firm called Seven Arrows Investment and Development Corporation. Once the business consultants traveled to the island and incurred the expenses for the venture, Seven Arrows instructed senior officers with Trump’s company—then called Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts—how to make it appear legal by linking it after-the-fact to a charitable effort." We can go on all day on and on because there are over 3500 of these law suits. I guess some kind of record.

Again, 1998 news.
 
You're making my point. Trump University is last month's news and it didn't seem to have much effect.
Well blind man heres a little newer information ---From NBC legal analyst, Lisa Bloom on the Trump rape of the 13 year old child.--This is the first declaration given to the court "Two unusual documents are attached to Jane Doe’s complaints - sworn declarations attesting to the facts. The first is from Jane Doe herself, telling her horrific story, including the allegation that Jeffrey Epstein also raped her and threatened her into silence, and this stunner:

Defendant Epstein then attempted to strike me about the head with his closed fists while he angrily screamed at me that he, Defendant Epstein, should have been the one who took my virginity, not Defendant Trump . . .

And this one:

Defendant Trump stated that I shouldn’t ever say anything if I didn’t want to disappear like Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant Trump and that I had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having my whole family killed."

The second is even worse then the first if anyone is interested , just ask and your wish is my command. This issue isn't going away and it shouldn't. I believe the charges , because that describes this man to a tee. He is all of that and worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom