• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton is 'nasty, but I can be nastier,' Trump says [W:19]

if you spend any time with people who served in the Clinton white house you will hear dozens of similar tales. Even Agents who were enthusiastic supporters of Bill Clinton commented about what a nasty bitch his arrogant wife is

Yup. I know that. It is one of the many reasons why I'm very much against her being in the White House ever again, and especially not as POTUS.

Aside from that, it gets more flexible. Right now, Trump is the one that has the best chance of making this happen.

Hell, the other guy keeps having 'Allepo' moments. :lamo
 
Yup. I know that. It is one of the many reasons why I'm very much against her being in the White House ever again, and especially not as POTUS.

Aside from that, it gets more flexible. Right now, Trump is the one that has the best chance of making this happen.

Hell, the other guy keeps having 'Allepo' moments. :lamo

The Libertarian Party has had some good candidates in the past-Ed Clark in 80 and then Andre Marrou a bit later both were very good men who would have been very good presidents

GJ seems like a bit of a light weight to me. Still morally well ahead of Clinton and most likely Trump. But a vote for him in Ohio is a wasted vote since its a toss up state. If the polls are such that the state is no longer at issue I might vote for him
 
Yup. I know that. It is one of the many reasons why I'm very much against her being in the White House ever again, and especially not as POTUS.

Aside from that, it gets more flexible. Right now, Trump is the one that has the best chance of making this happen.

Hell, the other guy keeps having 'Allepo' moments. :lamo

What's that old saying? "Treat others like you want to be treated" ?

Guess Bill's bimbo eruptions have really soured her milk or something.
 
The Libertarian Party has had some good candidates in the past-Ed Clark in 80 and then Andre Marrou a bit later both were very good men who would have been very good presidents

GJ seems like a bit of a light weight to me. Still morally well ahead of Clinton and most likely Trump. But a vote for him in Ohio is a wasted vote since its a toss up state. If the polls are such that the state is no longer at issue I might vote for him

Yeah, I think you're right. A bit of a light weight. I think he'd be less behind if he'd had managed to avoid his two latest gaffs. But this election seems to be a gaff a minute all around.

I guess this is what it looks like when the process discourages good people from running for office.
 
Yeah, I think you're right. A bit of a light weight. I think he'd be less behind if he'd had managed to avoid his two latest gaffs. But this election seems to be a gaff a minute all around.

I guess this is what it looks like when the process discourages good people from running for office.

some true wisdom
 
Back
Top Bottom